Brachial flow-mediated vasodilator responses in population-based research: methods, reproducibility and effects of age, gender and baseline diameter.

BACKGROUND: Brachial artery ultrasound has been proposed as an inexpensive, accurate way to assess cardiovascular risk in populations. However, analysis and interpretation of these data are not uniform. METHODS: We analysed the relationship between relative and absolute changes in brachial artery diameter in response to flow-mediated dilation and age, gender and baseline diameter among 4,040 ultrasound examinations from subjects aged 14 to 98 years. RESULTS: Reproducibility studies demonstrated intra- and interreader and intrasubject correlations from 0.67 to 0.84 for repeated measures of per cent change in diameter. Per cent change in diameter after flow stimulus was 3.58 +/- 0.10% (mean +/- standard deviation). Corresponding values for baseline diameter and absolute change in diameter were 4.43 +/- 0.87 mm and 0.15 +/- 0.01 mm, respectively. Baseline diameter and its variance were inversely related to per cent change in diameter (P< 0.001). In contrast, absolute change in diameter was more uniform throughout the range of baseline diameters. Baseline diameter was directly related, and per cent change in diameter inversely related, to age (P < 0.001 for all three measures). Time to maximum vasodilator response increased with age (P < 0.001). Women (n=2,315) had significantly larger per cent change in diameter than men (n=1,725) (P < 0.001). However, after adjustment for age and baseline diameter, per cent and absolute change were 5% smaller in women than men (P < 0.05 for both). In multivariate analysis, age was overwhelmingly the most important determinant of absolute change in diameter (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Automated analysis of brachial flow-mediated vasodilator responses is both feasible and reproducible in large-scale clinical and population-based research.

Differential effects of E and droloxifene on C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in healthy postmenopausal women.

Although increased levels of C-reactive protein have been linked to E therapy, the significance of this finding and whether it occurs with the selective ER modulators are unknown. Thirty-five healthy postmenopausal women were enrolled in a placebo-controlled, two-period cross-over design trial to evaluate the effects of 0.625 mg oral conjugated E and 60 mg droloxifene, a structural analog of tamoxifen, on serum levels of C-reactive protein, IL-6, and endothelial cell adhesion molecules. E treatment resulted in 65.8% higher levels of C-reactive protein (P = 0.0002) and 48.1% higher levels of IL-6 (P < 0.001), but also resulted in a 10.9% reduction in soluble E-selectin (P = 0.002) and borderline reductions in vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. In contrast, droloxifene had no effect on C-reactive protein and IL-6, but did produce a significant 11% reduction in E-selectin (P < 0.00001). However, droloxifene also resulted in an 11.6% increase in vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (P < 0.007). These data provide additional evidence of a proinflammatory effect of E that may have adverse cardiovascular consequences. However, these changes were also accompanied by a reduction in E-selectin, suggesting an antiinflammatory effect at the level of the endothelium. The net clinical impact of these changes is not yet well established. In contrast, droloxifene had little or no proinflammatory effects on C-reactive protein and IL-6 and had mixed effects on endothelial adhesion molecules. This observation provides additional rationale for continuing to evaluate the potential cardiovascular benefits of selective ER modulators.

Cardiovascular effects of droloxifene, a new selective estrogen receptor modulator, in healthy postmenopausal women.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators, like tamoxifen and related compounds, have mixed estrogen agonistic/antagonistic effects. Tamoxifen may confer significant cardiovascular benefits without the estrogen-associated risks of endometrial and breast cancer. Droloxifene, a structural analogue of tamoxifen, has estrogen agonistic effects on bone and antagonistic effects on endometrial and breast tissue. Its cardiovascular effects in women are unknown. We enrolled 24 healthy postmenopausal women in a randomized, double-blind, 2-period crossover trial comparing the effects of droloxifene (60 mg/d) with conjugated estrogen (0.625 mg/d). Plasma lipids, coagulation and fibrinolytic factors, and brachial flow-mediated vasodilator responses were measured at the beginning and end of each treatment period. Droloxifene and estrogen resulted in 16.6% and 12.0% reductions, respectively, in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (P<0.001) and 13.2% and 9.5% reductions, respectively, in lipoprotein(a) (P<0.05). In contrast, estrogen, but not droloxifene, increased high density lipoprotein (18.5%, P<0.001). Droloxifene also reduced fibrinogen by 17.8% versus a 7.3% reduction with estrogen (P=0.004) but produced no estrogen-like changes in plasminogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, or tissue plasminogen activator. Droloxifene and estrogen produced 36.4% and 27.3% increases, respectively, in flow-mediated vasodilation (percent change from baseline, P<0.05 for both). Droloxifene has estrogen agonistic properties regarding low density lipoprotein and lipoprotein(a) metabolism, certain coagulation factors, and endothelium-dependent vasodilation but, unlike estrogen, has no effect on high density lipoprotein/triglyceride metabolism and the fibrinolytic cascade. It remains unknown whether droloxifene can confer a true cardiovascular benefit.

Effects of mental stress on brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation in healthy normal individuals.

BACKGROUND: Mental stress is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events, possibly because of acute increases in endogenous catecholamines. Recently, brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation has been used for noninvasive assessment of macrovascular endothelial function. The effect of mental stress and its associated changes in sympathetic activation on brachial artery endothelium-dependent vasomotor tone in vivo remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two-dimensional ultrasound was used to measure brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation before and after mental stress (provoked by a standard arithmetic challenge) in 21 healthy individuals (10 men, 11 women; average age 23.5 years). The flow stimulus resulted from a 3-minute cuff occlusion of distal forearm blood flow, causing distal hyperemia and a transient 2- to 3-fold increase in brachial artery blood flow on cuff release. During mental stress, heart rate increased on average by 29.6% and blood pressure increased on average by 17.9%. The sympathetic stimulus resulted in a 64% average increase in flow-mediated vasodilator response (P <.001). The enhanced vasodilator response during mental stress was similar for men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Mental stress can have marked effects on endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated vasodilation in healthy, normal individuals. Similar studies in individuals with impaired endothelial function may further our understanding of the role of mental stress in the development of cardiovascular events.

Individual and combined effects of estrogen/progestin therapy and lovastatin on lipids and flow-mediated vasodilation in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the individual and combined effects of estrogen/progestin therapy versus lovastatin on lipids and flow-mediated vasodilation in postmenopausal women with heart disease. BACKGROUND: Little information is available regarding the relative benefits of estrogen replacement therapy versus reductase inhibitors and the potential utility of their combination as lipid-lowering therapy for postmenopausal women. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial in 24 postmenopausal women, each of whom received the following drug regimens during three consecutive six-week treatment periods: 1) hormone replacement (oral dose of 0.625 mg/day conjugated equine estrogens and 2.5 mg/day medroxyprogesterone acetate); 2) 20 mg lovastatin/day and 3) hormone replacement plus lovastatin. RESULTS: Total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were significantly lowered and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was significantly increased by all three regimens compared with baseline (p < 0.05). Lovastatin was more effective than estrogen/progestin in reducing LDL (p < 0.001), but estrogen/progestin was slightly more effective in increasing HDL. The hormone replacement and lovastatin regimen blocked the estrogen-associated increase in triglycerides. Hormone replacement (alone and with lovastatin) resulted in increases in brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilator capacity (p = 0.01 for both regimens) and the area under the curve (p = 0.016 and p = 0.005, respectively) compared with baseline. Percent dilation was greatest after the hormone replacement regimen, whereas the area under the curve was greatest after hormone replacement plus lovastatin (69% improvement vs. baseline). CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with coronary disease and hyperlipidemia, conjugated equine estrogen produced significant improvements in lipids and vasodilator responses despite the concurrent administration of low dose medroxyprogesterone acetate. Low dose lovastatin produced greater reductions in LDL, but less dramatic improvements in vasodilator responses. Estrogen/progestin plus lovastatin may provide additional benefits via a greater reduction in the LDL/HDL ratio and attenuation of estrogen-associated hypertriglyceridemia. More information is needed about the safety and efficacy of such combinations of hormone replacement and reductase inhibitor therapy.