RESUMO
A preliminary report from the recent phase 3 trial of benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to interleukin-5 receptor alpha (IL5Rα), in patients with EoE revealed that medication use led to tissue eosinophil eradication but did not meet the clinical endpoint of symptom resolution. Here, we characterized the clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and transcriptional changes in patients with active EoE following benralizumab treatment. We retrospectively examined patients with EoE treated with benralizumab at the University of Utah (n = 11) and reviewed reported clinical symptoms, circulating and tissue eosinophilia, and endoscopic and histologic scores. Gene expression profiles from available esophageal tissue from benralizumab-treated patients were compared to those from patients with remission EoE (n = 5), active EoE (n = 10), and controls (n = 22). Benralizumab treatment resulted in partial symptom improvement and significant reduction in tissue eosinophilia, and endoscopic and histologic disease scoring (P < 0.01). Histologic score reductions were driven by eosinophil feature scores, while scores for epithelial features (basal cell hyperplasia and dilated intercellular spaces) were similar to those in active EoE. The gene signatures in benralizumab-treated patients mimicked those of active EoE (e.g. upregulation of POSTN, CDH26, CCL26, and downregulation of DSG1). RNA profiles and pathways support histologic findings of impaired epithelial function that persists despite benralizumab treatment. In conclusion, despite eosinophil eradication, patients treated with benralizumab had persistent epithelial injury at the histologic and transcriptional level. In this cohort, benralizumab therapy failed to eradicate inflammation and epithelial dysfunction showing that interleukin-5 receptor alpha blockade monotherapy is insufficient to control EoE.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is associated with elevated IgG4 in oesophageal tissue and serum. Previously, we showed brush-collected oesophageal secretions of EoE patients contained food antigen-specific antibodies IgA and IgG4. It is unknown whether other food-specific antibodies are present along the surface of the oesophagus in EoE. AIM: To identify whether immunoglobulins other than IgG4 and food-specific antibodies are elevated along the oesophageal mucosal surface in oesophageal secretions in EoE patients METHODS: Concentrations of total IgA, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgM and IgE were measured in oesophageal secretions from patients with active (n = 19) and inactive EoE (n = 9), and non-EoE controls (n = 10). Food-specific antibodies were measured using beads coupled to protein components from dairy, wheat and egg. Total immunoglobulin and cytokine and chemokine concentrations were measured in serum, saliva and oesophageal secretions of four patients with active EoE. RESULTS: Oesophageal secretions have a unique immune profile. Patients with active EoE had elevated IgG2, IgG4 and IgM concentrations in oesophageal secretions compared to those with inactive EoE. Food-specific IgG1, IgG2, IgG4 and IgM were significantly increased in patients with active EoE compared to inactive EoE and non-EoE patients. Furthermore, active patients with a known dairy trigger display higher dairy-specific IgG1, IgG2, IgG4, IgM, IgA and IgE. CONCLUSIONS: There is a distinct localised profile of immunoglobulins and food-specific antibodies found within oesophageal secretions in EoE. These findings expand our knowledge about the currently identified immune responses in EoE and suggest possible roles for multiple immunoglobulins and food-specific antibodies in the pathophysiology of EoE.
