Real-Time Three-dimensional Dynamic Navigation for Post Space Preparation in Root Canal-Treated Teeth: An In vitro Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a real-time three-dimensional dynamic navigation system (3D-DNS) for post space preparation (PSP) in root canal-treated teeth and to compare the accuracy and efficiency of 3D-DNS to freehand (FH) for PSP. METHODS: Fifty-four maxillary molars were divided into two groups: 3D-DNS (n = 27) and FH group (n = 27). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken preoperatively and postoperatively. The drilling path for the PSP was virtually planned in the preoperative CBCT scan in the X-guide software (X-Nav Technologies, Lansdale, PA). For the 3D-DNS group, the PSP drilling was conducted under dynamic navigation. The 3D deviations and angular deflections were calculated. The residual dentin thickness (RDT) was determined after PSP. The operation time and the total number of mishaps were recorded. Shapiro-Wilk, t-test or Mann-Whitney rank sum, weighted Cohen's kappa, and Fisher exact tests were used (P < .05). RESULTS: The PSP was completed in all samples (54/54). The 3D-DNS was more accurate than the FH, with significantly fewer 3D deviations and angular deflections (all, P < .05). The 3D-DNS required less operating time than the FH (P < .05). For the 3D-DNS, no teeth had RDT < 1 mm, whereas 6/27 in the FH showed RDT < 1 mm after the PSP. There was no difference in the total number of mishaps (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the 3D-DNS is feasible for PSP. The 3D-DNS improved the accuracy and efficiency of PSP. The dynamic navigation system can potentially become a safe and reliable technology for PSP.

Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Device and Dynamic Navigation System for Postremoval in Maxillary Molars.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the feasibility of an augmented reality (AR) head-mounted device (HMD) displaying a dynamic navigation system (DNS) in the surgical site for fiber postremoval in maxillary molars and compares it to the DNS technique. METHODS: Fifty maxillary first molars were divided into 2 groups: AR HMD + DNS (n = 25) and DNS (n = 25). The palatal canal was restored with RelyX fiber post (3M ESPE) luted with RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE). A core buildup was performed using Paracore (Coltene/Whaledent). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken before and after postremoval. The drilling trajectory and depth were planned under X-guide software (X-Nav Technologies, Lansdale, PA). For the AR HMD + DNS group, the AR HMD (Microsoft HoloLens 2) displayed the DNS in the surgical site. The three dimensional (3D) deviations (Global coronal deviation [GCD] and global apical deviation [GAD]) and angular deflection (AD) were calculated. The number of mishaps and operating time were recorded. RESULTS: Fiber post was removed from all samples (50/50). The AR HMD + DNS was more accurate than DNS, showing significantly lower GCD and GAD deviations and AD (P < .05). No mishap was detected. The AR HMD + DNS was as efficient in time as DNS (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the AR HMD can safely display DNS in the surgical site for fiber post-removal in maxillary molars. AR HMD improved the DNS accuracy. Both AR HMD + DNS and DNS were time-efficient for fiber postremoval in maxillary molars.