Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 833: 155242, 2022 Aug 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35427624

RESUMO

Annual gross primary productivity (AGPP) serves as the basis for forming biomass and carbon sinks. Analysing the effects of ecosystem types on AGPP spatial variations would be beneficial for clarifying the spatial variability in AGPP, which would serve ecological management practices such as ensuring regional food security. Based on published eddy covariance measurements in China, we collected AGPP data from 128 ecosystems and analysed the effects of ecosystem types on the spatial variations in AGPP to reveal the AGPP spatial variability and its influencing factors over terrestrial ecosystems of China. The results showed that AGPP significantly differed among ecosystem types and vegetation regions, with the lowest AGPP appearing in grasslands, while different ecosystem types had comparable AGPP within the same vegetation region. The AGPP of all ecosystem types showed a decreasing latitudinal trend but slight longitudinal and altitudinal trends. Mean annual air temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP) were found to affect the spatial variations in AGPP over most ecosystem types, while other factors played little role. The mean annual leaf area index (LAI) and the maximum leaf area index (MLAI) were also found to affect the spatial variations in AGPP over most ecosystem types. Factors influencing the AGPP spatial variations differed among ecosystem types, but all included climatic and biotic factors. Therefore, climate inducing spatial distribution of ecosystem types and the non-zonal water supply made AGPP values and factors affecting the spatial variations in AGPP differ among ecosystem types, while different ecosystem types within the same vegetation region had comparable AGPP values. The spatial variation in AGPP over terrestrial ecosystems of China resulted from the integrated effects of climatic and biotic factors. Our study provided data support for improving the understanding of global AGPP spatial variability.


Assuntos
Mudança Climática , Ecossistema , Biomassa , China , Temperatura
2.
PeerJ ; 8: e9327, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32607282

RESUMO

Global warming has a known impact on ecosystems but there is a lack of understanding about its impact on ecosystem processes. Net ecosystem productivity (NEP) and its components play a key part in the global carbon cycle. Analysing the impact of global warming on NEP will improve our understanding of how warming affects ecosystems. In our study, conducted in 2018, five warming treatments were manipulated (0 W, 500 W, 1000 W, 1500 W, and 3000 W) using three repetitions of far infrared open warming over a paddy field in Northeast China. NEP and its two related components, gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER), were measured using the static chamber-infrared gas analyser method to explore the effects of different warming magnitudes on NEP. Results showed that measurement dates, warming treatments, and their interactions significantly affected NEP, ER, and GPP. Warming significantly increased NEP and its components but they showed a non-linear response to different warming magnitudes. The maximum increases in NEP and its components occurred at 1500 W warming. NEP is closely related to its components and the non-linear response of NEP may have primarily resulted from that of GPP. Gradient warming non-linearly increased GPP in the paddy field studied in Northeast China, resulting in the non-linear response of NEP. This study provides a basis for predicting the responses of carbon cycles in future climate events.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...