Vitreous amyloidosis with autonomic neuropathy of the digestive tract associated with a novel transthyretin p.Gly87Arg variant in a Bangladeshi patient: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder, first described in families with sensorimotor and autonomic neuropathy. Since its first description, more than 120 amyloidogenic transthyretin mutations have been reported with various geographic distributions and associated with a wide range of phenotypes involving the peripheral nerve, the heart, the gastrointestinal tract, the eyes, the central nervous system, or the kidneys. In some cases of transthyretin amyloidosis, the first clinical manifestation is vitreous opacity. CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old Bangladeshi woman presented with vitreous amyloidosis and progressive autonomic neuropathy of the digestive tract as initial clinical manifestations, with no clinical evidence of cardiac, renal, central nervous system, or peripheral nerve dysfunction. A novel transthyretin mutation, p.Gly87Arg, was identified in the heterozygous state in this proband of Bangladeshi origin. Histological examination of accessory salivary glands and gastric biopsies revealed Congo-red-positive deposits. Laser microdissection of salivary gland Congo-red deposits and tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis identified the mutated transthyretin peptide containing the arginine residue at position 87 of the mature protein. CONCLUSIONS: Vitreous amyloidosis should be considered a differential diagnosis of uveitis, in particular transthyretin amyloidosis. Proteomics data from our case, consistent with the genetic findings, highly suggests that this new p.Gly87Arg variant is amyloidogenic. Here, we described the second case of transthyretin amyloidosis reported in a Bangladeshi patient.

Sarcoidosis in Patients Treated with Vemurafenib for Metastatic Melanoma: A Paradoxical Autoimmune Activation.

BACKGROUND: Vemurafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, is a first-line treatment for inoperable melanoma. Sarcoidosis has never been reported in patients on vemurafenib. OBJECTIVES: We describe 5 cases of sarcoidosis in patients treated with vemurafenib. METHODS: Seventy patients receiving vemurafenib for a BRAF-mutated inoperable stage III or IV melanoma were treated in our centre. RESULTS: Five patients (7.1%) developed sarcoidosis or a sarcoid-like reaction on vemurafenib; 4 patients had cutaneous signs and 3 had extracutaneous disorders (bilateral hilar lymph nodes, uveitis). Histological analysis of skin lesions revealed epithelioid granulomas without necrosis, consistent with sarcoidosis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme levels were high in 2 patients. Cutaneous and ophthalmological lesions rapidly disappeared on topical corticosteroid treatment without the cessation of vemurafenib treatment. Complete remission of melanoma was observed in 3 patients and partial remission was observed in another. CONCLUSION: BRAF inhibitors probably have immune system-enhancing effects and should therefore be recognized as potential inducers of sarcoidosis.

Uveitis in patients with late-stage cutaneous melanoma treated with vemurafenib.

IMPORTANCE: This case series highlights the risk of uveitis in patients treated with vemurafenib for unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma. OBJECTIVE: To assess the occurrence and severity of uveitis as an adverse effect of vemurafenib therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: In this observational small case series, data were collected successively from May 1, 2012, through February 31, 2013, from patients with clinical signs of ocular inflammation treated with vemurafenib at the Department of Ophthalmology, Cochin-Hôtel-Dieu Hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients' demographics, vemurafenib dosages, and the intervals between the onset of treatment and the first ocular symptoms were recorded. The characteristics of ocular inflammatory manifestations were analyzed. The effect of the discontinuation of vemurafenib therapy on ocular manifestations was assessed, as well as the effect of rechallenging when vemurafenib was reintroduced. RESULTS: Seven patients (mean [SD] age, 74.7 [4.0] years) had uveitis. The vemurafenib dose was 960 mg twice per day in 6 patients and a half dose in 1 patient. The mean (SD) time until the appearance of ocular signs was 5.6 (2.3) months (range, 19 days to 7 months), and inflammation ranged from mild or low-grade anterior uveitis to severe explosive panuveitis complicated by retinal detachment. Signs of ocular inflammation were always bilateral. Optical coherence tomography revealed a macular edema in only 1 of the 7 patients. Clinical improvement occurred when vemurafenib therapy was stopped in 5 of 7 patients. The rechallenge at treatment reintroduction was positive in 2 of 7 patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This small case series highlights that uveitis can be a noteworthy adverse effect of vemurafenib therapy in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma. However, these cases of uveitis were usually restricted to the anterior segment and manageable with local corticosteroid therapy, which justified the continuation of vemurafenib therapy because the benefits regarding the patients' survival were greater than the risk to their vision.