Saving Hearts in Rural West Texas: The Impact of Critical Care Access on Mortality Rates.

Background The Critical Access Hospital (CAH) designation program was created in 1997 by the US Congress to reduce the financial vulnerability of rural hospitals and improve access to healthcare by keeping fundamental services in rural communities. Methods This is a retrospective observational study. Information on CAHs in West Texas in rural counties was extrapolated from the Flex Monitoring Team between 2010 and 2020. The study population included adults aged ≥25 years with a known heart failure (HF) diagnosis who were identified using ICD-10 codes. Mortality rates were obtained from the CDC Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) database. The HF population was categorized by age, sex, and ethnicity. Mortality differences among these groups were analyzed using a two-sample t-test. The significance level was considered to be p < 0.05. Results The total study population analyzed was 1,348,001. A statistically significant difference in age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) was observed between the study and control groups, with a value of 3.200 (95% CI: 3.1910-3.2090, p < 0.0001) in favor of a lower mortality rate in rural counties with CAHs. When comparing gender-related differences, males and females had lower AAMRs in rural counties with CAHs. Among each gender, statistically significant differences were noted between males (95% CI: 2.181-2.218, p < 0.001) and females (95% CI: 3.382-3.417, p < 0.001). When examining the data by ethnicity, the most significant difference in mortality rate was observed within the Hispanic population, 6.400 (95% CI: 6.3770-6.4230, p < 0.0001). When adjusted to age, the crude mortality rate was calculated, which favored CAH admission in the younger population (10.200 (95% CI: 10.1625-10.2375, p < 0.001) and 11.500 (95% CI: 11.4168-11.5832, p < 0.001) in the 55-64 and 65-74 age groups, respectively). Conclusion The data clearly showed that West Texas rural county hospitals that received CAH designation performed better in terms of mortality rates in the HF population compared to non-CAH.

Gender disparities and predictors of in-hospital mortality with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) is classically associated with significant gender disparities, such that it is more prevalent in females, but the clinical outcomes are worse for male patients. The goal of this study was to assess contemporary gender disparities in clinical outcomes of TCM hospitalizations and to determine predictors of male in-hospital mortality. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis involving adult hospitalizations for TCM in the U.S between 2016 and 2020. Multivariable Logistic regression was used to estimate Odds Ratio (OR) for in-hospital mortality between the two genders. Univariable Cox regression was performed to identify predictors associated with in-hospital mortality for male hospitalizations. All factors from the univariable analysis with p < 0.20 were included in a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 199,920 patients with TCM were identified. Female patients with TCM had 50% lower risk of in-hospital mortality compared to male patients (Adjusted OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.46-0.55, p < 0.001). Older age, higher Charlson comorbidity index, history of intracranial hemorrhage, cardiac arrest, need for vasopressor agents, mechanical intubation, and cardiogenic shock without the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) were associated with higher in-hospital male mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Although TCM is more prevalent among females, gender disparities exist in the clinical outcomes of TCM patients. Cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock without the use of temporary MCS were found to be the most significant predictors of male in-hospital mortality. Cardiogenic shock with use of temporary MCS did not lead to higher male in-hospital mortality.

Comparison of 30-day Readmission Rates and Inpatient Cardiac Procedures for Weekday Versus Weekend Hospital Admissions for Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Whether the timing of hospital presentation impacts care delivery and clinical outcomes for patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) remains a matter of debate. In this study, we examined all-cause and HF-specific 30-day readmission rates for patients who were admitted for HF on a weekend vs admitted for HF on a weekday. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmission Database to compare 30-day readmission rates among patients who were admitted for HF on a weekday (Monday to Friday) vs patients who were admitted for HF on a weekend (Saturday or Sunday). We also compared in-hospital cardiac procedures and temporal trends in 30-day readmission by day of index hospital admission. Among 8,270,717 index HF hospitalizations, 6,302,775 were admitted on a weekday and 1,967,942 admitted on a weekend. For weekday and weekend admissions, the 30-day all-cause readmission rates were 19.8% vs 20.3%, and HF-specific readmission rates were 8.1% vs 8.4%, respectively. Weekend admissions were independently associated with higher risk of all-cause (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.05, P < .001) and HF-specific readmission (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.05, P < .001). Weekend HF admissions were less likely to undergo echocardiography (aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96, P < .001), right heart catheterization (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.79-0.81, P < .001), electrical cardioversion (aOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.93, P < .001), or receive temporary mechanical support devices (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.89, P < .001). The mean length of stay was shorter for weekend HF admissions (5.1 days vs 5.4 days, P < .001). Between 2010 and 2019, 30-day all-cause (18.5% to 18.2%, trend P < .001) and HF-specific (8.4% to 8.3%, trend P < .001) readmission rates decreased among weekday HF admissions. Among weekend HF admissions, the HF-specific 30-day readmission rate decreased (8.8% to 8.7%, trend P < .001), but the all-cause 30-day readmission rate remained stable (trend P = .280). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized for HF, weekend admissions were independently associated with excess risk of 30-day all-cause and HF-specific readmission and a lower likelihood of undergoing in-hospital cardiovascular testing and procedures. The 30-day all-cause readmission rate has decreased modestly over time among patients admitted on weekdays, but has remained stable among patients admitted on weekends.