EPICAP: intervención educativa mediante cápsulas audiovisuales en pacientes con epilepsia. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado / EPICAP: educational intervention using instructional clips in patients with epilepsy. A randomised clinical trial

Objetivos La educación sanitaria en pacientes con epilepsia influye positivamente en el autocontrol de la enfermedad, mejora su pronóstico y favorece el bienestar del paciente. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar una intervención educativa mediante cápsulas audiovisuales en pacientes con epilepsia en una unidad de monitorización videoelectroencefalográfica.Sujetos y métodosEs un ensayo clínico aleatorizado con dos grupos (intervención y control). Se reclutó a pacientes adultos con epilepsia que ingresaron en la unidad de monitorización videoelectroencefalográfica. Se crearon nueve vídeos sobre el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la epilepsia, y recomendaciones de estilo de vida, que se administraron al grupo de intervención durante el ingreso. Se evaluó el conocimiento del paciente sobre su enfermedad con un cuestionario diseñado específicamente para este estudio. Se realizó una evaluación previa en el inicio del estudio, en el alta hospitalaria y a los tres meses, y se comparó el conocimiento sobre la epilepsia en ambos grupos en cada momento del estudio.ResultadosSe incluyó a 66 pacientes, con edad media de 39 ± 14,7 años (rango: 17-76) y una mediana de 8 años de evolución de la enfermedad (rango: 1-60 años). Un 53% eran mujeres. El tipo de epilepsia más frecuente fue el focal (95,5%). La puntuación media en el test preintervención fue de 57,2 ± 15,3. Los pacientes que recibieron la intervención educativa mostraron mejores puntuaciones en el postest en el alta hospitalaria (81,8 ± 11,2 frente a 62,8 ± 13,7; p = 0,001) y a los tres meses (76 ± 9,6 frente a 63,2 ± 12,8; p = 0,001).ConclusionesLa intervención educativa EPICAP mediante píldoras audiovisuales mejora de forma significativa el conocimiento de los pacientes sobre aspectos diagnósticos, terapéuticos y estilo de vida relacionados con la epilepsia. (AU)

AIMS. In patients with epilepsy health education has a positive influence on self-management of the disease, improves prognosis and enhances patient well-being. The aim of this study was to evaluate an educational intervention using instructional clips in patients with epilepsy in a video-electroencephalographic monitoring unit.SUBJECTS AND METHODSWe conducted a randomised clinical trial with two groups (intervention and control). Adult patients with epilepsy admitted to the video-electroencephalographic monitoring unit were recruited. Nine videos about the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy, together with recommendations on lifestyle, were produced and administered to the intervention group while admitted. Patients’ knowledge of their disease was assessed by means of a questionnaire designed specifically for this study. A pre-assessment was conducted at the beginning of the study, at hospital discharge and at three months, and the knowledge of epilepsy in the two groups was compared at each time considered in the study.RESULTSSixty-six patients were included, with a mean age of 39 ± 14.7 years (range: 17-76) and a median of 8 years since disease onset (range: 1-60 years). Fifty-three per cent of the patients were women. Focal epilepsy was the most frequent type (95.5%). The mean score on the pre-intervention test was 57.2 ± 15.3. Patients who received the educational intervention showed better post-test scores at discharge from hospital (81.8 ± 11.2 versus 62.8 ± 13.7; p = 0.001) and at three months (76 ± 9.6 versus 63.2 ± 12.8; p = 0.001).CONCLUSIONSThe EPICAP educational intervention using instructional clips significantly improves patients’ knowledge of epilepsy-related diagnostic, therapeutic and lifestyle issues. (AU)

[EPICAP: educational intervention using instructional clips in patients with epilepsy. A randomised clinical trial]. / EPICAP: intervención educativa mediante cápsulas audiovisuales en pacientes con epilepsia. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado.

AIMS: In patients with epilepsy health education has a positive influence on self-management of the disease, improves prognosis and enhances patient well-being. The aim of this study was to evaluate an educational intervention using instructional clips in patients with epilepsy in a video-electroencephalographic monitoring unit. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomised clinical trial with two groups (intervention and control). Adult patients with epilepsy admitted to the video-electroencephalographic monitoring unit were recruited. Nine videos about the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy, together with recommendations on lifestyle, were produced and administered to the intervention group while admitted. Patients' knowledge of their disease was assessed by means of a questionnaire designed specifically for this study. A pre-assessment was conducted at the beginning of the study, at hospital discharge and at three months, and the knowledge of epilepsy in the two groups was compared at each time considered in the study. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included, with a mean age of 39 ± 14.7 years (range: 17-76) and a median of 8 years since disease onset (range: 1-60 years). Fifty-three per cent of the patients were women. Focal epilepsy was the most frequent type (95.5%). The mean score on the pre-intervention test was 57.2 ± 15.3. Patients who received the educational intervention showed better post-test scores at discharge from hospital (81.8 ± 11.2 versus 62.8 ± 13.7; p = 0.001) and at three months (76 ± 9.6 versus 63.2 ± 12.8; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The EPICAP educational intervention using instructional clips significantly improves patients' knowledge of epilepsy-related diagnostic, therapeutic and lifestyle issues.

TITLE: EPICAP: intervención educativa mediante cápsulas audiovisuales en pacientes con epilepsia. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado.Objetivos. La educación sanitaria en pacientes con epilepsia influye positivamente en el autocontrol de la enfermedad, mejora su pronóstico y favorece el bienestar del paciente. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar una intervención educativa mediante cápsulas audiovisuales en pacientes con epilepsia en una unidad de monitorización videoelectroencefalográfica. Sujetos y métodos. Es un ensayo clínico aleatorizado con dos grupos (intervención y control). Se reclutó a pacientes adultos con epilepsia que ingresaron en la unidad de monitorización videoelectroencefalográfica. Se crearon nueve vídeos sobre el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la epilepsia, y recomendaciones de estilo de vida, que se administraron al grupo de intervención durante el ingreso. Se evaluó el conocimiento del paciente sobre su enfermedad con un cuestionario diseñado específicamente para este estudio. Se realizó una evaluación previa en el inicio del estudio, en el alta hospitalaria y a los tres meses, y se comparó el conocimiento sobre la epilepsia en ambos grupos en cada momento del estudio. Resultados. Se incluyó a 66 pacientes, con edad media de 39 ± 14,7 años (rango: 17-76) y una mediana de 8 años de evolución de la enfermedad (rango: 1-60 años). Un 53% eran mujeres. El tipo de epilepsia más frecuente fue el focal (95,5%). La puntuación media en el test preintervención fue de 57,2 ± 15,3. Los pacientes que recibieron la intervención educativa mostraron mejores puntuaciones en el postest en el alta hospitalaria (81,8 ± 11,2 frente a 62,8 ± 13,7; p = 0,001) y a los tres meses (76 ± 9,6 frente a 63,2 ± 12,8; p = 0,001). Conclusiones. La intervención educativa EPICAP mediante píldoras audiovisuales mejora de forma significativa el conocimiento de los pacientes sobre aspectos diagnósticos, terapéuticos y estilo de vida relacionados con la epilepsia.

Debilidad como complicación del paciente crítico por COVID-19: características clínicas y factores pronósticos en una serie de casos / Weakness as a complication of COVID-19 in critically ill patients: clinical features and prognostic factors in a case series

Introducción: La debilidad es una complicación frecuente en el enfermo crítico por COVID-19. Se describen sus características, y los factores que pueden condicionarla y predecirla. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio observacional descriptivo prospectivo con pacientes ingresados en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) por COVID-19 entre abril y mayo de 2020 con debilidad muscular. Se consideró una afectación clínica grave un equilibrio motor igual o inferior a 3/5 según la escala de fuerza muscular modificada del Medical Research Council. Se han realizado 25 estudios analíticos, 16 estudios neurofisiológicos y una biopsia muscular; seguimiento telefónico al mes; análisis comparativo entre los grupos con y sin afectación grave, y determinación de puntos de corte de parámetros analíticos para predecir afectación grave mediante curvas ROC. Resultados: Se incluyó a 25 pacientes con 58 años (desviación estándar ± 9) de edad media. La mediana de estancia en la UCI fue de 27,5 días. Todos los electromiogramas mostraban un patrón miógeno y el 75%, también una neuropatía. El grupo con afectación clínica grave tenía mayores niveles de dímero-D (p = 0,08), lactato deshidrogenasa (p = 0,03) e interleucina 6 (p = 0,10), y la combinación de la alteración de dos cualquiera de estos tres parámetros pronosticaba la afectación grave con una sensibilidad del 100% y una especificidad del 76,9%. Al mes de seguimiento, el 36% no podía deambular autónomamente y el 92% seguía con debilidad muscular. Conclusiones: La debilidad en el enfermo por COVID-19 grave tiene una repercusión clínica importante. Su detección y estudio precoces mediante predictores de su desarrollo pueden permitir un mejor manejo. La ausencia en algunos casos de los factores de riesgo clásicos para la debilidad adquirida en la UCI sugiere una fisiopatología diferente.(AU)

Introduction: Weakness is a frequent complication in those critically ill due to COVID-19. This study describes its characteristics and the factors that can condition and predict it. Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective, descriptive, observational study of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to COVID-19 between April and May 2020 with muscle weakness. A motor balance equal to or lower than 3/5 according to the modified Medical Research Council muscle strength scale was considered to be severe clinical impairment. Altogether 25 analytical studies, 16 neurophysiological studies and one muscle biopsy were performed, with a telephone follow-up at one month, a comparative analysis between the groups with and without severe compromise, and determination of cut-off points for analytical parameters to predict severe involvement using ROC curves. Results: The sample consisted of 25 patients with a mean age of 58 years (standard deviation ± 9). The median length of stay in the ICU was 27.5 days. All the electromyograms exhibited a myogenic pattern and 75% also showed neuropathy. The group with severe clinical involvement had higher levels of D-dimer (p = 0.08), lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.03) and interleukin-6 (p = 0.10), and the combination of the alteration of any two of these three parameters predicted severe involvement with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 76.9%. At one month of follow-up, 36% were unable to walk autonomously and 92% continued with muscle weakness. Conclusions: Weakness in severe COVID-19 patients has a major clinical impact. Its early detection and study by means of predictors of its development may allow for better management. The absence in some cases of classical risk factors for ICU-acquired weakness suggests a different pathophysiology.(AU)

Prognosis of status epilepticus in elderly patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical features and prognosis of status epilepticus (SE) in patients above 70 years old. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients ≥70 years old with SE registered prospectively during 4 years. Follow-up after discharge was performed. RESULTS: Ninety patients were evaluated. Acute symptomatic etiology was the most prevalent. The mean number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used was 2.7 ± 1.2, and 21% of the patients required sedation. A poor outcome was considered when death (31.1%) or developing of new neurological impairment at discharge (32.2%) occurred. After multivariate analysis, four variables predicted a poor outcome: acute symptomatic etiology (OR: 6.320; 95% CI: 1.976-20.217; P = .002), focal motor SE type (OR: 9.089; 95% CI: 2.482-33.283; P = .001), level of consciousness (OR: 4.596; 95% CI: 1.903-11.098; P = .001), and SE duration >12 hours (OR: 3.763; 95% CI: 1.130-12.530; P = .031). Independent predictive factors of mortality were SE duration >12 hours (OR: 4.306; 95% CI: 1.044-17.757; P = .043), modified Status Epilepticus Severity Score (mSTESS) (OR: 2.216; 95% CI: 1.313-3.740; P = .003), and development of complications (OR: 3.334; 95% CI: 1.004-11.070, P = .049). Considering long-term mortality, age (HR 1.036; 95% CI 1.001-1.071; P = .044), a potentially fatal underlying cause (HR 2.609; 95% CI 1.497- 4.548; P = .001), and mSTESS score >4 (HR 1.485; 95% CI 1.158-1.903; P = .002) remained as predictive factors. There was no association between sedation and the number of AEDs used with outcome at discharge or long-term mortality (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: SE above 70 years old has a high morbimortality. Prognosis is not related to treatment aggressiveness.

Reconocimiento de los síntomas del ictus y respuesta frente a ellos en la población / Knowledge about stroke symptoms and attitude towards them in the population

Introducción. Conocer el significado de los síntomas de un ictus y tener percepción de urgencia ante ellos es un factor decisivo para reducir la demora extrahospitalaria. El objetivo es analizar el grado de reconocimiento de sus síntomas en los pacientes con un ictus, su actitud ante ellos y los factores que influyen en el conocimiento de la enfermedad. Métodos. Se estudian prospectivamente 292 pacientes consecutivos diagnosticados de ictus mediante un protocolo de recogida de datos que incluye 76 variables. Se realiza análisis univariante y multivariante para identificar las variables que se asocian independientemente con una mejor interpretación de sus síntomas y percepción de urgencia. Resultados. Sólo un 34% de pacientes reconoció saber que estaba sufriendo un ictus. El antecedente de ictus previo (OR: 3,97), vivir en una residencia (odds ratio [OR]: 3,20), tener síntomas motores (OR: 1,92) y un ictus más grave (OR: 1,05) se asociaron de forma independiente a un mejor reconocimiento de los síntomas. Sólo un 31,8 % de pacientes (41% de los que reconocieron los síntomas del ictus) decidió acudir inmediatamente al hospital o llamó a una ambulancia. La etiología cardioembólica del infarto (OR: 2,62), no tener hipertensión (OR: 0,48) y reconocer correctamente sus síntomas (OR: 0,62) son factores asociados de forma independiente a una mayor percepción de urgencia. Conclusión. Sólo un 14 % de los pacientes tienen un buen conocimiento del ictus y actúan correctamente cuando éste ocurre. Es necesario desarrollar programas de formación de la población en los que se resalte la urgencia ante la presencia de síntomas sugestivos de ictus (AU)

Introduction. To know the meaning of stroke symptoms and to perceive them as an emergency is a decisive factor to reduce hospital admission delay. The aim of the study is to analyze the degree of recognition of stroke symptoms by the patients, their attitude towards them, and which factors contribute to a better knowledge on cerebrovascular diseases. Methods. A total of 292 patients diagnosed of stroke were studied prospectively, following a protocol designed for data collection that included 76 variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify which variables were independently associated with a better interpretation of stroke symptoms and emergency perception. Results. Only 34% of all patients recognized they were suffering a stroke. The background that was independently associated with a better interpretation of symptoms included previous stroke (odds ratio [OR]: 3.97), institutionalized subjects (old people's home) (OR: 3.20), motor symptoms (OR: 1.92) and more serious stroke (OR: 1.05). Only 31% of all patients, 41% of whom had recognized stroke symptoms, decided to go immediately to hospital or call for an ambulance. Variables that were independently associated with a better perception of emergency included cardioembolic stroke (OR: 2.62), not having hypertension (OR: 0.48) and a correct interpretation of stroke symptoms (OR: 0.62). Conclusion. Only 14% of all patients have a good knowledge about stroke and correctly act when it occurs. It is necessary to develop education programs aimed at the population that emphasize the emergency when symptoms suggesting stroke appear (AU)

[Knowledge about stroke symptoms and attitude towards them in the population]. / Reconocimiento de los síntomas del ictus y respuesta frente a ellos en la población.

INTRODUCTION: To know the meaning of stroke symptoms and to perceive them as an emergency is a decisive factor to reduce hospital admission delay. The aim of the study is to analyze the degree of recognition of stroke symptoms by the patients, their attitude towards them, and which factors contribute to a better knowledge on cerebrovascular diseases. METHODS: A total of 292 patients diagnosed of stroke were studied prospectively, following a protocol designed for data collection that included 76 variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify which variables were independently associated with a better interpretation of stroke symptoms and emergency perception. RESULTS: Only 34% of all patients recognized they were suffering a stroke. The background that was independently associated with a better interpretation of symptoms included previous stroke (odds ratio [OR]: 3.97), institutionalized subjects (old people's home) (OR: 3.20), motor symptoms (OR: 1.92) and more serious stroke (OR: 1.05). Only 31% of all patients, 41% of whom had recognized stroke symptoms, decided to go immediately to hospital or call for an ambulance. Variables that were independently associated with a better perception of emergency included cardioembolic stroke (OR: 2.62), not having hypertension (OR: 0.48) and a correct interpretation of stroke symptoms (OR: 0.62). CONCLUSION: Only 14% of all patients have a good knowledge about stroke and correctly act when it occurs. It is necessary to develop education programs aimed at the population that emphasize the emergency when symptoms suggesting stroke appear.