An Audit on the Pre-operative Fasting Time of Trauma-List Orthopaedic Patients at a District General Hospital in Chichester, United Kingdom.

INTRODUCTION: Pre-operative fasting of patients awaiting non-emergency surgeries has been a common practice to minimise the risk of vomiting and aspiration at the time of induction of anaesthesia. Current standard guidelines recommend that this fasting time be limited to two hours for clear fluids and six hours for solids and semi-solids, as prolonged fasting has been shown to be harmful to the patient. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study of the fasting times of all adult trauma orthopaedic patients who were operated on under anaesthesia between June 1 and 30, 2023. Fifty patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. RESULTS: The minimum and maximum fasting times observed for solids and semi-solids were 9 and 24 hours, respectively. The mean fasting time for solids and semi-solids was 15.8 hours. The minimum and maximum fasting times observed for clear fluids were 2 and 20 hours, respectively. The mean fasting time for clear fluids was 10.5 hours. Elderly patients accounted for a significant portion of the patients, with 64% (n=32) being above the age of 70 years. CONCLUSION: A significant disparity was noted between the current fasting practices and the recommended standards set out by the Royal College of Nursing, the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, the European Society of Anaesthesiology, and the American Society of Anaesthesiologists. The knowledge of pre-operative fasting among the orthopaedic team doctors and the ward nursing staff was found to be inadequate.

Audit on the Adequacy of Consenting Practices for Neck of Femur Fracture Surgeries.

INTRODUCTION: Doctors are bound to obtain informed written consent prior to any form of surgical procedure on a patient. The General Medical Council (GMC) and the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) provide guidance on what constitutes valid consent. Failure to obtain valid and adequate consent can have legal ramifications. All relevant material risks associated with the surgery must be discussed with the patient during the consenting process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of the consenting practices for neck of femur fracture surgeries, covering a period of three months, from the 15th of April to the 15th of July 2023. We evaluated the consent forms of 100 patients, of which 63 were consent form-1 and were included in the study. The British Orthopaedics Association (BOA)-endorsed consent forms, together with the RCS and GMC guidance on consent, which were used as the standard for the audit. RESULTS: The majority of the consents were obtained by senior house officers (SHO) and core surgical trainees who did not have prior formal orthopaedic training (52.4%). The risks that were most frequently documented were infection, blood clots (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), and bleeding, with documentation rates of over 90%. Prosthetic joint dislocation following hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement was not mentioned in 22.2% of the forms. Neurovascular injury was not documented in 20.6% of the consent forms. Less than 75% documentation rates were observed for postoperative pain (74.6%), anesthetic complications (73%), failure (malunion/non-union/loosening of prosthesis) (68.3%), leg length discrepancy (60.3%), bone damage/fracture (50.8%), death (49.2%), wound-related complications/scars (42.9%), and hip stiffness (14.3%). None of the patients had been advised about the probable need for catheterization following surgery. We also noted that 22.2% (n=14) of the consent forms did not contain the diagnosis or the indication for surgery, 12.7% (n=8) did not mention the intended benefits, and 28.6% (n=18) of the consent forms had no mention of the responsible consultant. We also noted that in 25.4% (n=16) of the cases, the possible requirement of a blood transfusion had not been mentioned. CONCLUSION: The audit revealed several deficiencies in the consenting of patients for neck and femur fracture surgeries. There were poor documentation rates for risks associated with surgery, especially the less common and rare ones. We also identified several deficiencies in the remaining aspects of the consent forms that were not in keeping with the GMC and RCS guidance on consent. The lack of orthopaedic training and knowledge among the senior house officers and core trainees may be a contributing factor.

Proximal ulna fractures in adults: A review of diagnosis and management.

Proximal ulna fractures are relatively common upper limb injuries, which may represent fragility fractures or result from high-energy trauma. These include fractures of the olecranon, coronoid and associated radial head dislocations. A wide variety of treatment options are available for the management of these injuries that makes the selection of most appropriate treatment difficult. We aim to provide a brief overview of the treatment options for such injuries.

Treatment strategies for osteochondral lesions of the talus: A review of the recent evidence.

BACKGROUND: There has been no consensus regarding the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus, there has been many attempts to formulate a treatment pathway, with multiple proposed modalities and adjuncts used. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper was to investigate the evidence published in the recent history, identify the relevant papers, review and summarize the findings, to help clarify the available operative treatment options and their respective efficacies based on the level of evidence provided. STUDY DESIGN & METHODS: A literature search through electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE was done, these databases were screened for publications and papers form June 2004 to June 2019. Key words were utilised in the search 'talus, talar, tibia, cartilage, osteochondral, ankle, osteochondritis dissecans, articular cartilage'. Studies on adults aged 18-60 years were included. Exclusion criteria were studies with less than 10 patients, or no clear outcome was recorded. Papers were reviewed by the authors and data extracted as per a pre-defined proforma. RESULTS: Following screening, 28 published articles were included and reviewed. Of these publications 5 were level I, 7 level II, 4 level III and 12 level IV. The total number of patients was 1061 patients. Treatment modalities included arthroscopic microfracture, drilling, hyaluronic acid injection, platelet rich plasma, osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT), vascularised free bone graft among others. The most common functional measures used to assess efficacy were the Visual analogue scale (VAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle (AOFAS) score. Follow up ranged from 26 weeks upto 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the abundance of treatment options, high level evidence (level I) remains limited and does not conclude a definitive treatment modality as superior to others. Further research, in the form highly organised randomised clinical trials, is needed to help improve the efficacy and develop new treatment modalities in the future.