A systematic review and meta-analysis of general versus regional anesthesia for lower extremity amputation.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation (LEA) has remained high. Studies investigating the influence of the anesthetic modality on the postoperative outcomes have yielded conflicting results. The aim of our study was to assess the effects of regional anesthesia vs general anesthesia on postoperative complications for patients undergoing LEA. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from 1990 to 2022 for studies investigating the effect of the anesthetic modality on the postoperative outcomes after LEA. Regional anesthesia (RA) included neuraxial anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks. The outcomes included 30-day mortality, respiratory failure (unplanned postoperative intubation, failure to wean, mechanical ventilation >24 hours), surgical site infection, cardiac complications, urinary tract infection, renal failure, sepsis, venous thrombosis, pneumonia, and myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Of the 25 studies identified, we included 10 retrospective observational studies with 81,736 patients, of whom 69,754 (85.3%) had received general anesthesia (GA) and 11,980 (14.7%) had received RA. In the GA group, 50,468 patients were men (63.8%), and in the RA group, 7813 patients were men (62.3%). The results of the meta-analyses revealed that GA was associated with a higher rate of respiratory failure (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.80; P = .02) and sepsis (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.33; P < .0001) compared with RA. No differences were found in postoperative 30-day mortality, surgical site infection, cardiac complications, urinary tract infection, renal failure, venous thrombosis, pneumonia, and myocardial infarction between the GA and RA groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our meta-analysis have shown that GA could be associated with a higher rate of respiratory failure and sepsis compared with RA for LEA.

National Delphi Survey on Anesthesiology Resident Training in Perioperative Ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: To establish agreement among nationwide experts through a Delphi process on the key components of perioperative ultrasound and the recommended minimum number of examinations that should be performed by a resident upon graduation. DESIGN: A prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: A survey on multiinstitutional academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Anesthesiology residency program directors and/or experts in perioperative ultrasound. INTERVENTIONS: A list of components and examinations recommended for anesthesiology resident training in perioperative ultrasound was developed based on guidelines and 2 survey rounds among a steering committee of 10 experts. A questionnaire asking for a rating of each component on a 5-point Likert scale subsequently was sent to an expert panel of 120 anesthesiology residency program directors across the United States. An agreement of at least 70% of participants, rating a component as 4 or 5, was compulsory to list a component as essential for anesthesiology resident training in perioperative ultrasound. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The nationwide survey's response rate was 62.5%, and agreement was reached after 2 Delphi rounds. The final list included 44 essential components for basic ultrasound physics and knobology, cardiac ultrasound, lung ultrasound, and ultrasound-guided vascular access. Agreement was not reached for abdominal ultrasound, gastric ultrasound, and ultrasound-guided airway assessment. Agreement for the recommended minimum number of examinations that should be performed by a resident upon graduation included 50 each for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, and 20 each for lung ultrasound, ultrasound-guided central line, and ultrasound-guided arterial line placements. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations outlined in this survey can be used to establish standardized training for perioperative ultrasound by anesthesiology residency programs.

Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery and Renal Dysfunction; Association of Demographic and Clinical Variables with Proximal Clamp Location.

BACKGROUND: While cross-clamp site is a known risk factor for postoperative acute and chronic renal dysfunction following open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery (AAA), the additive impact of patient demographic and clinical factors is lacking. In this study, we investigated the impact of body mass index (BMI), surgical duration and aneurysm diameter on the association between proximal cross-clamp location and postoperative renal dysfunction. METHODS: In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 4,197 patients undergoing open AAA surgery between 2011 and 2018 using data housed in the American College of Surgeons National Safety Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. The primary outcome was renal dysfunction, which was defined as patients requiring dialysis within 30 days or patients with ≥2 mg/dL rise in creatinine from baseline. We assessed the incidence of renal dysfunction with regard to clamp location and subsequently used multivariable logistic regression to assess clinical and demographic factors associated with renal dysfunction. We used a regression model to plot the association of BMI, surgical duration, and aneurysm diameter with an adjusted probability of postoperative acute and chronic renal dysfunction for individual cross-clamp locations. RESULTS: Of the 4,197 patients analyzed, 405 patients (9.6%) developed renal dysfunction within 30 days with 287 patients requiring dialysis. Patients with supraceliac clamp location had the highest incidence of renal dysfunction (20.4%). Our data showed a significant association of renal dysfunction with higher BMI patients [OR 1.04 (1.02, 1.07), P = 0.001], longer operative times [OR1.01 (1.01, 1.02), P < 0.001], clamp location between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and renal artery [OR 1.80 (1.17, 2.78), P = 0.007] and supraceliac clamp location [OR 2.47 (1.62, 3.76), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of renal dysfunction increases with suprarenal clamps. Patients with higher BMI, longer operative times, and increasing aneurysm diameter, and a suprarenal clamp have a significantly increased risk of renal dysfunction compared to those who also had a suprarenal clamp but lower BMI, shorter operative times and smaller aneurysm diameter.

Three-Dimensional Printing of Patient-Specific Heart Valves: Separating Facts From Fiction and Myth From Reality.

The development of prosthetic heart valves by Dr. Charles Hufnagel in 1952 was a major clinical innovation; however, it was not an ideal solution. Mechanical prosthetic heart valves are rigid, immunogenic, require anticoagulation, do not grow with the patient, and have a finite life.1 An ideal prosthetic valve should overcome all these limitations. Considering the prevalence of valvular heart disorders, there is considerable interest in the creation of patient-specific heart valves. Following the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) printing in 1986 by Chuck Hill, rapid advances in multimodality 3D imaging and modeling have led to a generation of tangible replicas of patient-specific anatomy. The science of organogenesis has gained importance for a multitude of valid reasons: as an alternate source of organs, for realistic drug testing, as an alternative to animal testing, and for transplants that grow with the patient. What scientists imagined to be seemingly impossible in the past now seems just a step away from becoming a reality. However, due to the disruptive nature of this technology, often there are commercially-motivated claims of originality and overstatement of the scope and applicability of 3D printing. It often is difficult to separate fact from fiction and myth from reality. In this manuscript, the authors have reviewed the historic perspective, status of the basic techniques of organogenesis with specific reference to heart valves, and their potential.