Improving food insecurity screening across a health system throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity has direct and indirect negative outcomes on the physical and mental health of children, with impacts throughout adult life. Rates of food insecurity have increased dramatically since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends paediatricians screen and intervene to address food insecurity. We aimed to increase the percentage of patient encounters with food insecurity screening completion at the paediatric medical home from 0% to 85% by July 2020 with extension to the paediatric emergency department (ED) and paediatric specialty clinic in the following year. METHODS: This multicentre project occurred in three sites within our health system: a teaching safety-net, paediatric medical home; a paediatric ED; and five divisions within paediatric specialty medical clinics. A screening tool was created using the validated Hunger Vital Sign Questionnaire. A standard screening, documentation and referral process was developed. The Model for Improvement was used testing changes via Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. RESULTS: The percentage of households screened for food insecurity increased from a median of 0% to 30% for all sites combined. There was significant variability in screening with the ED screening a median of 24% and the medical home screening 80% by the end of the study period. A total of 9842 households (20.9%) screened were food insecure. During the study period, 895 families with 3925 household members received 69 791 pounds of food from our primary community resource using our clinic's food prescription. Of these families, 44% (398) also qualified for the US Department of Agriculture programme ensuring ongoing food distribution up to twice a month. DISCUSSION: Using quality improvement methodology to address a critical community need, we implemented food insecurity screening across a hospital system including multiple sites and specialties and provided critical resources to households in need.

Three-Year Longitudinal Follow-up of the Psychiatry Early Experience Program (PEEP): Gaining and Sustaining Positive Attitudes Towards Psychiatry in Students at a UK Medical School.

OBJECTIVE: The Psychiatry Early Experience Programme (PEEP) is a novel enrichment activity at Kings College London medical school. Throughout their five-year degree, students shadow trainee psychiatry doctors. The study aimed to evaluate whether more regular early exposure affects attitudes towards psychiatry. METHODS: Forty first-year medical students joined PEEP and completed a baseline survey, including questions on demographics, current top three choices of medical specialty and the 30-item Attitudes Towards Psychiatry questionnaire (ATP-30). Participants completed annual follow up surveys, incorporating free-text questions about what students had learned and whether their views about psychiatry had changed. RESULTS: Over three years there was a sustained improvement in mean ATP-30 scores (8.27 points higher at three years than at baseline [95% CI 2.86-13.7, T=3.2, p=0.005]). There was no significant difference between baseline specialty choice and specialty choice at three-year follow-up. At three years there was a 55% response rate. There was no significant association between non-responders at three years and baseline ATP-30, specialty choice or demographic factors. Thematic analysis of qualitative data suggested that PEEP challenged preconceptions towards psychiatry and highlighted its relevance in medicine. CONCLUSIONS: The results offer some support that exposure to clinical psychiatry through longitudinal shadowing experiences can sustain positive attitudes. Areas for development include using a control group and following-up participants to the point when they specialize. It remains unclear whether it is most effective to select participants based on established commitment to psychiatry or to try to influence students who are still undecided.

Pediatric care during a short-term medical mission to a Syrian refugee camp in Northern Jordan.

INTRODUCTION: The Syrian refugee crisis, now in its 6th year, has displaced millions. Refugees depend on support from host nation governments and humanitarian organizations like the Syrian American Medical Society (SAMS). We describe the delivery of pediatric care during a SAMS short-term medical mission to a refugee camp in Northern Jordan. METHODS: The medical mission team encompassed dozens of specialties. Teams visited many sites, including the Zaatari refugee camp near the Syrian border. For this study, we gathered quantitative data from one physician who provided pediatric care and anecdotes from multiple SAMS physicians who provided pediatric care in Zaatari during the same time period. The physician supplying the quantitative data recorded age, diagnoses, and prescriptions for each patient. RESULTS: The physician saw an average of 69 patients per day. Many of these were children aged 0-4 years. At least one diagnosis was recorded for 73.9% of patients, and at least one prescription was recorded for 85.5% of patients. DISCUSSION: Most presenting complaints involved acute infectious illnesses, but these seemed preventable and related to refugees' living situations. Mental health assessment was difficult. Referrals proved important for evaluation and management of both acute and chronic conditions. For the short term, we emphasize the importance of effective liaison with refugee camp authorities and outside health-care organizations. For the long term, we recommend increased health-care infrastructure development and more emphasis on preventative care. CONCLUSION: With this study, we provide new quantitative and qualitative insights into pediatric care during a short-term medical mission to a Syrian refugee camp in Northern Jordan.