Trombosis del stent 10 años después de la intervención coronaria percutánea con stents nuevos frente a stents de la primera generación. Observaciones del metanálisis DECADE / Ten-year patterns of stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention with new- versus early-generation drug-eluting stents: insights from the DECADE cooperation

Introducción y objetivos El metanálisis DECADE es un análisis de datos de pacientes individuales de ensayos de stents liberadores de fármacos (SLF) con un seguimiento de 10 años. El objetivo del estudio es analizar el riesgo de trombosis definitiva del stent (TS) hasta 10 años después de la intervención coronaria percutánea (ICP) en pacientes tratados con DES de primera y de nueva generación. Métodos Se agruparon los datos de pacientes individuales de cinco ensayos de SLF con un seguimiento de 10 años. El objetivo primario fue la TS hasta 10 años después de la ICP. Los pacientes se dividieron en 2 grupos según la generación de stent implantada (primera y nueva). El análisis de los datos de los participantes individuales se realizó mediante el enfoque de una etapa. Resultados Se incluyeron 9.700 pacientes, 6.866 en el grupo de SLF nuevos y 2.834 en el grupo de SLF de primera generación. A los 10 años, la TS se produjo en 69 de los 6.866 pacientes tratados con SLF de nueva generación y en 91 de los 2.834 pacientes tratados con la SLF de primera generación (1,0% frente a 3,5%, razón de tasas 0,32; IC95%, 0,23-0,45). La tasa de TS fue menor en el grupo de SLF de nueva generación en comparación con el grupo de SLF de primera, de 1-5 años (razón de tasas 0,14; IC95%, 0,08-0,26) y de 5-10 años (razón de tasas 0,23; IC95%, 0,08-0,61) después de la ICP. Conclusiones La incidencia de TS hasta 10 años después de la ICP con los SLF de nueva generación es del 1%. Los SLF de nueva generación se asocian a una menor incidencia de TS a 10 años comparados con los SLF de primera generación, especialmente después de 1 año de la ICP (AU)

Introduction and objectives The DECADE cooperation is a pooled analysis of individual patient data from drug-eluting stent (DES) trials with a 10-year follow-up. This analysis reports the risk of definite stent thrombosis (ST) through to 10 years after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients treated with early- and new-generation DES. Methods Individual patient data from 5 DES trials with a 10-year follow-up were pooled. The primary endpoint was definite ST up to 10 years after PCI. Patients were divided into 2 groups as per the generation of DES implanted (early and new DES). Individual participant data were analyzed using a 1-stage approach. Results We included 9700 patients, 6866 in the new DES group and 2834 in the early DES group. Through to 10 years, definite ST occurred in 69 of 6866 patients treated with new DES and in 91 of 2834 patients treated with early DES (1.0% vs 3.5%, adjusted hazard ratio, 0.32; 95%CI, 0.23-0.45). The rate of definite ST was lower in the new DES group than in the early DES group from 1 to 5 years (rate ratio, 0.14; 95%CI, 0.08-0.26) and from 5 to 10 years (rate ratio, 0.23; 95%CI, 0.08-0.61) after PCI. Conclusions The incidence of definite ST through to 10 years after PCI with new-generation DES was 1%. New-generation DES are associated with a lower 10-year incidence of definite ST than early-generation DES, particularly beyond 1 year after PC (AU)

A 4-item PRECISE-DAPT score for dual antiplatelet therapy duration decision-making

The originally-proposed PRECISE-DAPT score is a 5-item risk score supporting decision-making for dual antiplatelet therapy1 duration after PCI. It is unknown if a simplified version of the score based on 4 factors (age, hemoglobin, creatinine clearance, prior bleeding), and lacking white-blood cell count, retains potential to guide DAPT duration. The 4-item PRECISE-DAPT was used to categorize 10,081 patients who were randomized to short (3-6 months) or long (12-24 months) DAPT regimen according to high (HBR defined by PRECISE-DAPT ≥25 points) or non-high bleeding risk (PRECISE-DAPT<25) status. Long treatment duration was associated with higher bleeding rates in HBR (ARD +2.22% [95% CI +0.53 to +3.90]) but not in non-HBR patients (ARD +0.25% [-0.14 to +0.64]; pint = 0.026), and associated with lower ischemic risks in non-HBR (ARD -1.44% [95% CI -2.56 to -0.31]), but not in HBR patients (ARD +1.16% [-1.91 to +4.22]; pint = 0.11). Only non-HBR patients experienced lower net clinical adverse events (NACE) with longer DAPT (pint = 0.043). A 4-item simplified version of the PRECISE-DAPT score retains the potential to categorize patients who benefit from prolonged DAPT without concomitant bleeding liability from those who do not. (AU)

Long-term outcome of the unrestricted use of everolimus-eluting stents compared to sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients: the Bern-Rotterdam diabetes cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Newer generation everolimus-eluting stents (EES) improve clinical outcome compared to early generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). We investigated whether the advantage in safety and efficacy also holds among the high-risk population of diabetic patients during long-term follow-up. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2009, a total of 1963 consecutive diabetic patients treated with the unrestricted use of EES (n=804), SES (n=612) and PES (n=547) were followed throughout three years for the occurrence of cardiac events at two academic institutions. The primary end point was the occurrence of definite stent thrombosis. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 1.0% of EES, 3.7% of SES and 3.8% of PES treated patients ([EES vs. SES] adjusted HR=0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.88; [EES vs. PES] adjusted HR=0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.67). Similarly, patients treated with EES had a lower risk of target-lesion revascularization (TLR) compared to patients treated with SES and PES ([EES vs. SES], 5.6% vs. 11.5%, adjusted HR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.55-0.83; [EES vs. PES], 5.6% vs. 11.3%, adjusted HR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.77). There were no differences in other safety end points, such as all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and MACE. CONCLUSION: In diabetic patients, the unrestricted use of EES appears to be associated with improved outcomes, specifically a significant decrease in the need for TLR and ST compared to early generation SES and PES throughout 3-year follow-up.