Adrenoceptor subtypes in the control of burn-induced plasma extravasation.

Burn trauma is known to induce a significant rise in circulating catecholamine levels and despite catecholamines being potent endogenous vasoactive agents with known actions on microvascular permeability, their effect on burn edema has been poorly investigated. The present study in rats investigated the role and importance of adrenergic receptor subtypes in the regulation of basal capillary permeability in normal skin and hyperpermeability in partial- and full-thickness skin burns. Edema was quantified by spectrophotometric analysis of extravasated Evans blue-albumin. Evaluation was based on intravenous administration of the following adrenergic agonists and antagonists: l-phenylephrine (alpha(1)-receptor agonist), prazosin (alpha(1)-receptor antagonist), clonidine (alpha(2)-receptor agonist), yohimbine (alpha(2)-receptor antagonist), prenalterol (beta(1)-receptor agonist), terbutaline (beta(2)-receptor agonist), or propranolol (beta(1)- and beta(2)-receptor antagonist). Results showed increased capillary permeability in normal skin following administration of terbutaline (p<0.01) and yohimbine (p<0.01). In partial-thickness burns, clonidine significantly (p<0.05) reduced edema formation, whereas in full-thickness burns edema was significantly reduced by clonidine (p<0.05) and l-phenylephrine (p<0.01). In conclusion, the inhibition of postburn edema induced by stimulation of alpha(1)-receptors (l-phylephrine) and alpha(2)-receptors (clonidine) could be secondary to increased vascular resistance and reduced tissue perfusion pressure and/or suppressed inflammatory reaction in the burn injury. In the treatment of burn patients, clonidine is particularly interesting since the agent has previously been proven to induce potent analgesia in thermally injured.

Regulation of postburn ischemia by alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor subtypes.

Deep skin burns are characterised by progressive ischemia secondary to vasoconstriction and thrombosis formation. Burn trauma elicits increased sympathetic activity and elevation of circulating catecholamines acting on adrenoceptors in vascular tissue playing an important role in the regulation of organ blood flow. The present study in rats investigated the role of alpha- and beta-adrenoceptors in the circulatory changes taking place in normal skin and in partial- and full-thickness skin burns using laser Doppler flowmetry. Evaluation was based on intravenous administration of the following adrenergic agonists and antagonists: l-phenylephrine (alpha(1)-agonist), prazosin (alpha(1)-antagonist), clonidine (alpha(2)-agonist), yohimbine (alpha(2)-antagonist), prenalterol (beta(1)-agonist), terbutaline (beta(2)-agonist), and propranolol (beta(1)- and beta(2)-antagonist). Blood flow in normal skin was reduced by phenylephrine (p<0.001), clonidine (p<0.001) and propranolol (p<0.01), and increased by prazosin (p<0.05), yohimbine (p<0.05), prenalterol (p<0.05) and terbutaline (p<0.01). In partial-thickness burns, blood flow was reduced by phenylephrine (p<0.01), clonidine (p<0.01) and propranolol (p<0.05). In full-thickness burns, only clonidine reduced perfusion (p<0.05). In conclusion, beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors play important role in the physiological regulation of skin perfusion but are of lesser importance for postburn skin perfusion. Vasoconstrictive alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenoceptors were shown to be tonically active in normal skin and in partial-thickness burns, exerting a negative effect on skin perfusion which was further potentiated by exogenous administration of alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-agonists and reversed by selective alpha-blockers. In full-thickness burns, activation of alpha(2)-receptors was shown to significantly impair skin circulation, raising a flag of warning for the use of clonidine to treat pain in burn patients.

Role of histamine receptors in the regulation of edema and circulation postburn.

Despite histamine being a potent endogenous vasoactive agent released in increasing amounts postburn, its role in postburn oedema formation has been controversial and its effect on burn circulation poorly investigated. The present study investigated the involvement of H(1), H(2) and H(3) receptors in postburn edema in rats exposed to skin and muscle burns and their influence on skin circulation postburn. We used the selective antagonists clemastine (H(1)), ranitidine (H(2)), thioperamide (H(3)) and the selective H(3) receptor agonist, imetit. Results showed that none of the antagonists or the H(3) agonist had significant effect on postburn edema measured by quantitative spectrophotometric analysis of extravasated Evans blue-albumin in the full-thickness burned skin or muscle. Clemastine and thioperamide failed to induce significant effect on blood flow in the partial- or full-thickness skin burn injury as measured by laser Doppler flowmetry, while ranitidine significantly (P<0.01) reduced blood flow in the full-thickness burn. In contrast, the H(3) receptor agonist, imetit, significantly increased blood flow, both in the partial-thickness burn injury (P<0.05) and in the full-thickness burn (P<0.01). Moreover, imetit significantly (P<0.01) increased mean arterial pressure while thioperamide significantly (P<0.01) reduced systemic pressure. In conclusion, H(1), H(2) and H(3) receptors are not important actors in the regulation of vascular patency permeability, whereas H(3) receptors play an important role by increasing skin circulation postburn, presumably by relaxation of vascular smooth muscle and/or by interacting with other inflammatory neurotransmitters. Data also suggest that H(2) receptor blockers may not be best choice for stress ulcer prophylaxis in burn patients.