Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Health Econ Manag ; 23(1): 149-172, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36131191

RESUMO

Increasing expenditures on retail pharmaceuticals bring a critical challenge to the financial stability of healthcare systems worldwide. Policy makers have reacted by introducing a range of measures to control the growth of public pharmaceutical expenditure (PPE). Using panel data on European and non-European OECD member countries from 1990 to 2015, we evaluate the effectiveness of six types of demand-side expenditure control measures including physician-level behaviour measures, system-level price-control measures and substitution measures, alongside a proxy for cost-sharing and add a new dimension to the existing empirical evidence hitherto based on national-level and meta-studies. We use the weighted-average least squares regression framework adapted for estimation with panel-corrected standard errors. Our empirical analysis suggests that direct patient cost-sharing and some-but not all-demand-side measures successfully dampened PPE growth in the past. Cost-sharing schemes stand out as a powerful mechanism to curb PPE growth, but bear a high risk of adverse effects. Other demand-side measures are more limited in effect, though may be more equitable. Due to limitations inherent in the study approach and the data, the results are only explorative.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Análise dos Mínimos Quadrados , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro , Preparações Farmacêuticas
2.
Copenhagen; World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe; 2018.
em Inglês | WHO IRIS | ID: who-329440

RESUMO

The incidence of catastrophic health spending is lower in Austria than in many countries in Europe, but higher than in countries such as France, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The main gap in health coverage comes from user charges (co-payments), which are applied to most health services and can be high for some groups of people. Importantly, the type and level of co-payment often vary significantly across social insurance schemes and funds, exacerbating inequality in access to health care. Co-payments for outpatient medicines, however, are uniform across the country, and made more affordable by an income-related cap set at 2% of household income. To improve financial protection in Austria, policy attention should focus on ensuring that low-income households are systematically exempt from all co-payments, and on extending the income-related cap to co-payments for all health services. Some of this could be financed by better use of public resources and redistribution across social insurance schemes through a risk-equalization mechanism.This review is part of a series of country-based studies generating newevidence on financial protection in European health systems.


Assuntos
Áustria , Financiamento da Assistência à Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Financiamento Pessoal , Pobreza , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde
4.
Health Care Manag Sci ; 17(4): 331-47, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24338279

RESUMO

While standard economic theory posits that privately owned hospitals are more efficient than their public counterparts, no clear conclusion can yet be drawn for Austria in this regard. As previous Austrian efficiency studies rely on data from the 1990s only and are based on small hospital samples, the generalizability of these results is questionable. To examine the impact of ownership type on efficiency, we apply a Data Envelopment Analysis which extends the existing literature in two respects: first, it evaluates the efficiency of the Austrian acute care sector, using data on 128 public and private non-profit hospitals from the year 2010; second, it additionally focusses on the inpatient sector alone, thus increasing the comparability between hospitals. Overall, the results show that in Austria, private non-profit hospitals outperform public hospitals in terms of technical efficiency. A multiple regression analysis confirms the significant association between efficiency and ownership type. This conclusive result contrasts some international evidence and can most likely be attributed to differences in financial incentives for public and private non-profit hospitals in Austria. Therefore, by drawing on the example of the Austrian acute care hospital sector and existing literature on the German acute care hospital sector, we also discuss the impact of hospital financing systems and their incentives on efficiency. This paper thus also aims at providing a proof of principle, pointing out the importance of the respective market conditions when internationally comparing hospital efficiency by ownership type.


Assuntos
Eficiência Organizacional , Administração Financeira de Hospitais , Propriedade , Áustria , Setor de Assistência à Saúde , Modelos Estatísticos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...