[PI-RADS 2.0 for Prostate MRI]. / Prostatadiagnostik nach PI­RADS 2.0.

The PI-RADS 2.0 classification was established by an international collaboration of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and AdMetech Foundation to globally standardize the acquisition and interpretation of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The PI-RADS 2.0 aims to improve the detection, localization, staging and risk stratification of patients with suspected or histologically confirmed prostate cancer. Suspicious areas on T2-weighted (T2w) MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) were assessed for the presence of a clinically significant prostate cancer with scale from 1 to 5 with 5 being most likely to represent clinically significant prostate cancer. The dominant sequence to detect significant prostate cancer in the peripheral zone is DWI and for the transition zone T2w images. For the local staging of prostate cancer criteria for the assessment of an extracapsular growth were formulated.

Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI hybrid systems using a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer: initial experience.

PURPOSE: (68)Ga-labelled HBED-CC-PSMA is a highly promising tracer for imaging recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). The intention of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of PET/MRI with this tracer. METHODS: Twenty patients underwent PET/CT 1 h after injection of the (68)Ga-PSMA ligand followed by PET/MRI 3 h after injection. Data from the two investigations were first analysed separately and then compared with respect to tumour detection rate and radiotracer uptake in various tissues. To evaluate the quantification accuracy of the PET/MRI system, differences in SUVs between PET/CT and corresponding PET/MRI were compared with differences in SUVs between PET/CT 1 h and 3 h after injection in another patient cohort. This cohort was investigated using the same PET/CT system. RESULTS: With PET/MRI, different diagnostic sequences, higher contrast of lesions and higher resolution of MRI enabled a subjectively easier evaluation of the images. In addition, four unclear findings on PET/CT could be clarified as characteristic of PCa metastases by PET/MRI. However, in PET images of the PET/MRI, a reduced signal was observed at the level of the kidneys (in 11 patients) and around the urinary bladder (in 15 patients). This led to reduced SUVs in six lesions. SUVmean values provided by the PET/MRI system were different in muscles, blood pool, liver and spleen. CONCLUSION: PCa was detected more easily and more accurately with Ga-PSMA PET/MRI than with PET/CT and with lower radiation exposure. Consequently, this new technique could clarify unclear findings on PET/CT. However, scatter correction was challenging when the specific (68)Ga-PSMA ligand was used. Moreover, direct comparison of SUVs from PET/CT and PET/MR needs to be conducted carefully.

[Potential of PET/MRI for diagnosis of prostate cancer]. / Potenziale der PET/MRT in der Diagnostik des Prostatakarzinoms.

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: A present goal is to improve detection and staging of prostate cancer using innovative imaging technology such as PET/MRI. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: The modality of choice for detection of prostate cancer is multiparametric MRI. Furthermore, PET/CT is used, in particular, for the detection and staging of distant metastases and recurrent disease. For assessment of bone metastases, the method most commonly used is bone scintigraphy. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: The development of a simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI system is the last great "fusion" of the known cross-sectional image modalities. In addition, synthesis of new, innovative tracers such as (18)F-FACBC or (68)Ga-PSMA allows more specific detection of prostate cancer. PERFORMANCE: Hybrid PET/MRI imaging has the potential to replace conventional imaging techniques in the future. ACHIEVEMENTS: The method is just starting the broad application. Clinical studies must be expanded in order to substantiate the additional value of the method. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Currently, there is still a low distribution situation, since it is a new and cost-intensive method. At the same time, there is still no consistent solution for reimbursement. The importance in practice first rises by clarifying the payment situation and further demonstration of the method's benefit by larger studies.

[Fusion imaging in urology: combination of MRI and TRUS for detection of prostate cancer]. / Fusionsbildgebung in der Urologie: Die Kombination von MRT und TRUS zur Detektion des Prostatakarzinoms.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents the most accurate imaging modality for prostate cancer imaging to date. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is easily applied and therefore remains the gold standard for systematic prostate biopsies. However, the advantages of both modalities can be combined by image fusion. Currently, several image fusion devices are being implemented into clinical routine. First data show an increased detection rate of prostate cancer compared to systematic TRUS biopsies. At present prostatic deformation and intracorporeal movement represent technical challenges yet to be overcome. The present article gives an overview about the status of MRI-based biopsy techniques and highlights the current studies on the topic.

[Organ toxicity of medicinal tumor therapy: morphological correlates]. / Organtoxizität medikamentöser Tumortherapien: morphologische Korrelate.

CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL ISSUE: In antineoplastic chemotherapy classical cytostatic drugs are increasingly being supplemented by antibodies and so-called targeted therapies. In addition to the antineoplastic effect and general intolerance quite characteristic morphological changes can often be found and identified by the radiologist. The distinction between findings indicating side effects versus tumor progression or an infectious etiology is essential. FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES: Classical antineoplastic chemotherapy interacts with DNA and RNA synthesis, DNA repair or the mitosis process. In contrast modern targeted anticancer therapies act at the level of signal transduction pathways.Localized, organ-related changes are related to the metabolic characteristics of organs or anatomical features such as the properties of the local blood-tissue barrier. Toxicity associated findings often resemble fulminant tumor progression. EVALUATION: In new targeted anti-cancer therapies toxicity often occurs in a non-cumulative way; therefore, morphological changes are often precursors of the manifestation of clinical toxicity. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Oncological radiology requires increasingly active interdisciplinary dialogue in order to delineate morphological correlates of organ toxicity against tumor progression and initiate appropriate therapeutic measures.

[PI-RADS classification: structured reporting for MRI of the prostate]. / PI-RADS-Klassifikation: Strukturiertes Befundungsschema für die MRT der Prostata.

PURPOSE: To flesh out the ESUR guidelines for the standardized interpretation of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) for the detection of prostate cancer and to present a graphic reporting scheme for improved communication of findings to urologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ESUR has recently published a structured reporting system for mMRI of the prostate (PI-RADS). This system involves the use of 5-point Likert scales for grading the findings obtained with different MRI techniques. The mMRI includes T2-weighted MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and MR spectroscopy. In a first step, the fundamentals of technical implementation were determined by consensus, taking into account in particular the German-speaking community. Then, representative images were selected by consensus on the basis of examinations of the three institutions. In addition, scoring intervals for an aggregated PI-RADS score were determined in consensus. RESULTS: The multiparametric methods were discussed critically with regard to implementation and the current status. Criteria used for grading mMRI findings with the PI-RADS classification were concretized by succinct examples. Using the consensus table for aggregated scoring in a clinical setting, a diagnosis of suspected prostate cancer should be made if the PI-RADS score is 4 or higher (≥ 10 points if 3 techniques are used or ≥ 13 points if 4 techniques are used). Finally, a graphic scheme was developed for communicating mMRI prostate findings. CONCLUSION: Structured reporting according to the ESUR guidelines contributes to quality assurance by standardizing prostate mMRI, and it facilities the communication of findings to urologists.

[Detection of bone metastasis of prostate cancer - comparison of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy]. / Nachweis ossärer Metastasen des Prostatakarzinoms - Vergleich der Leistungsfähigkeit der Ganzkörper-MRT und der Skelettszintigrafie.

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer continues to be the third leading cancer-related mortality of western men. Early diagnosis of bone metastasis is important for the therapy regime and for assessing the prognosis. The standard method is bone scintigraphy. Whole-body MRI proved to be more sensitive for early detection of skeletal metastasis. However, studies of homogenous tumor entities are not available. The aim of the study was to compare bone scintigraphy and whole-body MRI regarding the detection of bone metastasis of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 14 patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer and a bone scintigraphy as well as whole-body MRI within one month were included. The mean age was 68 years. Scintigraphy was performed using the planar whole-body technique (ventral and dorsal projections). Suspect areas were enlarged. Whole-body MRI was conducted using native T 1w and STIR sequences in the coronary plane of the whole body, sagittal imaging of spine and breath-hold STIR and T 1w-Flash-2D sequences of ribs and chest. Bone scintigraphy and whole-body MRI were evaluated retrospectively by experienced radiologists in a consensus reading on a lesion-based level. RESULTS: Whole-body MRI detected significantly more bone metastasis (p = 0.024). 96.4 % of the demonstrated skeletal metastases in bone scintigraphy were founded in whole-body MRI while only 58.6 % of the depicted metastases in MRI were able to be located in scintigraphy. There was no significant difference regarding bone metastasis greater than one centimeter (p = 0.082) in contrast to metastasis less than one centimeter (p = 0.035). Small osteoblastic metastases showed a considerably higher contrast in T 1w sequences than in STIR imaging. Further advantages of whole-body MRI were additional information about extra-osseous tumor infiltration and their complications, for example stenosis of spinal canal or vertebral body fractures, found in 42.9 % of patients. CONCLUSION: Whole-body MRI using native STIR and T 1w sequences is superior to bone scintigraphy for the detection of small bone metastasis of prostate cancer. Simultaneous clarification of associated complications demonstrates further advantages.

[Risk management--a new aspect of quality assessment in intensive care medicine: first results of an analysis of the DIVI's interdisciplinary quality assessment research group]. / Risk-Management--Ein neuer Aspekt der Qualitätssicherung in der Intensivmedizin: Erste Ergebnisse einer Analyse der IAG Qualitätssicherung Intensivmedizin der DIVI.

Patient security has become one of the major aspects of clinical management in recent years. The crucial point in research was focused on malpractice. In contradiction to the economic process in non medical fields, the analysis of errors during the in-patient treatment time was neglected. Patient risk management can be defined as a structured procedure in a clinical unit with the aim to reduce harmful events. A risk point model was created based on a Delphi process and founded on the DIVI data register. The risk point model was evaluated in clinically working ICU departments participating in the register data base. The results of the risk point evaluation will be integrated in the next data base update. This might be a step to improve the reliability of the register to measure quality assessment in the ICU.

[KIS-RIS-PACS integration: the Marburg approach]. / KIS-RIS-PACS-Integration: der Marburger Weg.

When describing the development of data processing at the Department of Radiology at the Philipps University of Marburg, three phases can be identified covering the areas of patient care, education, and research as well as administrative and organizational aspects. The first phase (1987-1995) was centered on radiology and characterized by the early implementation of the radiology information system (RIS) and installation of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS). The experiences gained during this phase led to intensive discussion on application-oriented information processing. The second phase (1996-2000) describes the changes in the general framework brought by Internet technology and international standards. The course was set for the future of data processing in the hospital setting. The phase ended with implementation of a clinical workplace system (KAS) as the basis for a comprehensive electronic patient record and the switch in radiology to an integrated RIS solution. The third phase (2001-2006) addressed further implementation and development of clinical data management in which both regular documentation of patient data and information processing not related to patients are optimized by making use of Intranet/Internet technology. It includes the hospital wide implementation of PACS and the forthcoming phase of information processing increasingly shaped by workflow and decision support.