Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Scand J Rheumatol ; 34(6): 460-3, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16393769

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare levels of the advanced glycation end product (AGE) N(epsilon)-carboxymethyllysine (CML) present in the muscle tissue and in the serum of patients with fibromyalgia (FM) vs. healthy controls. METHODS: The serum levels of CML were measured in 41 patients with FM and 81 healthy controls. The presence of CML, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB), the AGE receptor (RAGE), collagen types I, II, VI, and CD68-positive monocytes/macrophages in muscle tissue of 14 patients with FM was investigated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Patients with FM showed significantly increased serum levels of CML in comparison to healthy controls. The immunohistochemical investigation revealed a stronger staining for CML and NF-kappaB and more CD68-positive monocytes/macrophages in the muscle of FM patients. The collagens and CML were co-localized, suggesting that the AGE modifications were related to collagen. RAGE was absent in controls but a faint and patchy staining was seen in FM. CONCLUSIONS: In the interstitial connective tissue of fibromyalgic muscles we found a more intensive staining of the AGE CML, activated NF-kappaB, and also higher CML levels in the serum of these patients compared to the controls. RAGE was only present in FM muscle. AGE modification of proteins causes reduced solubility and high resistance to proteolytic digestion of the altered proteins (e.g. AGE-modified collagens). AGEs can stimulate different types of cells by activation of the transcription factor NF-kappaB, mediated by specific receptors of AGEs (e.g. RAGE) on the cell surface. Both mechanisms may contribute to the development, perpetuation, and spreading of pain characteristic in FM patients.


Assuntos
Fibromialgia/sangue , Lisina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Antígenos CD/análise , Antígenos de Diferenciação Mielomonocítica/análise , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Colágeno/análise , Feminino , Fibromialgia/metabolismo , Produtos Finais de Glicação Avançada/sangue , Produtos Finais de Glicação Avançada/metabolismo , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Lisina/sangue , Lisina/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculos/metabolismo , NF-kappa B/análise , NF-kappa B/metabolismo , Receptor para Produtos Finais de Glicação Avançada , Receptores Imunológicos/análise , Receptores Imunológicos/metabolismo
2.
Clin Nephrol ; 61(1): 30-9, 2004 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14964455

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The beta-chemokines MCP-1 (CCL2) and RANTES (CCL5) have been shown to play important roles in acute renal transplant rejection (AR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). The potential relationship of expression of these chemokines, their chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR2, CCR5, and the cell populations of inflammatory infiltrate, histological and clinical diagnoses were investigated in biopsies at the time of AR and compared with biopsies of CAN. METHODS: In 24 renal transplant biopsies with AR (n = 15) and CAN (n = 9), the expression of MCP-1 and RANTES, their receptors CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 and the infiltration with monocytes/macrophages and T cells were studied. RESULTS: As previously described, chemokine and chemokine receptor expression was found mainly in mononuclear cells infiltrating the interstitium and glomeruli. In the tubulointerstitial area and glomeruli the expression of MCP-1, RANTES, and their receptors correlated with an infiltration by monocytes/macrophages. Biopsies with CAN revealed a lower expression of MCP-1, RANTES, CCR1, CCR2 and CCR5 in tubulointerstitial cells, and a significantly lower infiltration with MRP14-positive monocytes/macrophages than biopsies with AR. In AR, MCP-1 and CCR1 showed a lower expression compared to RANTES, CCR2, and CCR5. CONCLUSIONS: The positive correlation between chemokines and chemokine receptors and infiltrating leukocytes during acute rejection, the lower but detectable expression of MCP-1, RANTES, CCR1, CCR2 and CCR5 in CAN, and the differences in the quantity of expression between the different chemokines and chemokine receptors point to a complex regulation of chemokine expression in renal allografts. Since chemokines are not only involved in inflammation but also in tissue regeneration, this could have impact on the development of CAN.


Assuntos
Quimiocina CCL2 , Quimiocina CCL5/biossíntese , Citocinas/biossíntese , Rejeição de Enxerto/metabolismo , Nefropatias/metabolismo , Transplante de Rim , Biossíntese de Proteínas , Receptores CCR5/biossíntese , Receptores de Quimiocinas/biossíntese , Adulto , Biópsia , Quimiocina CCL5/análise , Doença Crônica , Citocinas/análise , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Nefropatias/etiologia , Glomérulos Renais/química , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/patologia , Túbulos Renais/química , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas/análise , Receptores CCR1 , Receptores CCR2 , Receptores CCR5/análise , Receptores de Quimiocinas/análise
3.
Clin Nephrol ; 58(4): 305-12, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12400847

RESUMO

In this study, the sensitivity of the aurine tricarboxylic acid (ATA) and acid solochrome azurine (ASA) stain for aluminum were compared under special consideration of the relationship to bone histology in renal osteodystrophy. Al deposition in iliac crest bone biopsies taken from 78 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) was assessed histochemically using the ATA and ASA stain; the Al accumulation was correlated with bone histology and histomorphometry. Significantly more Al was detectable with the ASA method on trabecular bone surfaces and cement lines (18 +/- 20% vs 4 +/- 12% on surfaces; 13 +/- 18% vs 0.4 +/- 1.3% on cement lines). In 31 cases in which ATA yielded negative results, ASA in contrast indicated Al deposits on up to 20% of the trabecular bone surface. The specimens with more Al on the trabecular bone surface had a significantly higher osteoid volume and osteoid surface. With ATA, these differences were observed at a staining of > or = 10% of the trabecular surface, with ASA at a staining of > or = 40% of the trabecular surface. Therefore, it seems to be possible to detect a very low Al deposition, without any Al-induced changes in bone morphology or signs of Al toxicity in the bone using the ASA method. By contrast, a positive ATA stain is mainly found in biopsies with typical signs of Al-induced changes of histomorphometric bone parameters. We, therefore, recommend the routine use of the ASA stain to detect Al deposition in bone.


Assuntos
Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Alumínio/metabolismo , Benzoatos , Doenças Ósseas/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Ósseas/diagnóstico , Osso e Ossos/química , Osso e Ossos/efeitos dos fármacos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Ácido Aurintricarboxílico , Biópsia , Osso e Ossos/patologia , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoblastos/efeitos dos fármacos , Diálise Renal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espectrofotometria Atômica , Coloração e Rotulagem , Estatística como Assunto , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...