The influence of talonavicular versus double arthrodesis on load dependent motion of the midtarsal joint.

BACKGROUND: Today the most frequently used operative procedures in advanced arthritis of the hindfoot joints are isolated talonavicular arthrodesis and double arthrodesis (involving the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints, i.e. the Chopart joint). This in vitro study investigates whether the fusion of the talonavicular joint alone can provide the hindfoot, as well as a midfoot, with comparable biomechanical stability as the double arthrodesis does. Hence with the less-invasive intervention the same benefit in terms of pain reduction and better functionality could be achieved. METHODS: In a series of ten fresh cadaver feet without any radiological pathologies, we measured the range of motion of different tarsal bones in three planes under axial stress. Every foot was loaded without arthrodesis, after talonavicular and after double arthrodesis, by charging tibia and fibula with a force of 350 N using a calibrated Instron® load frame. Each tarsal bone was marked with a K-wire and its motion was measured by registering the movement of the wire's shade that was projected onto the surrounding walls of the trial box. RESULTS: Both operative procedures led to a considerable reduction of the motion of every marked bone to a mean of 18% of the preoperative value. In direct comparison of the two simulated arthrodeses we found for every bone and in every plane only minimal differences of the mean excursions of 1.0 mm on average. Both fusions lead to equal residual tarsal bone motion postoperatively, and provide the midtarsal joint as well as the subtalar joint with comparable biomechanical stability. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis is a useful and effective alternative to double arthrodesis. It is the less complicated, less-invasive and functionally equivalent operative option for arthritic alterations of the hindfoot and transverse tarsal joint.

Stabilization of the femoral head with a gliding screw in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

OBJECTIVE: In situ fixation of the proximal femoral epiphysis to prevent further dislocation while maintaining the potential for longitudinal growth by insertion of a central gliding screw. Prevention of secondary coxarthrosis. INDICATIONS: Incipient and imminent slipped capital femoral epiphysis in children with a displacement angle of < 30 degrees in the axial view (ET' < 30 degrees ) and prophylactic treatment of the contralateral side. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Allergies to implant materials. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: A Kirschner wire is inserted through a lateral proximal approach in the femur into the center of the displaced epiphysis at a right angle to its base. Overdrilling of the wire, thread tapping in the cancellous bone, insertion of the cannulated gliding screw with washer. The screw threads lie only in the epiphysis. The unthreaded part of the screw bridges the growth plate. The screw is allowed to protrude by about 2.5 cm to prevent an epiphyseodesis effect. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial weight bearing of the affected extremity up to 10 kg body weight for 6 weeks. Thrombosis prophylaxis during convalescence only for adolescents with signs of puberty (menarche/pubarche). Restriction on sports activities for 3 months. Follow-ups: clinical and radiologic examinations at 3 months postoperatively, then clinical examination every 6 months and radiologic assessment annually (possibly earlier, if there is a growth spurt). The gliding screw is removed when growth is completed. RESULTS: 63 hips (34 prophylactically and 29 therapeutically) were stabilized with the gliding screw. Clinically, the prophylactically stabilized hips showed excellent outcomes; of the therapeutically stabilized hips, the results were 19 excellent, seven good, two satisfactory, and one poor. Differences in leg length were seen in five cases, whereby the average value was 0.3 cm (0-1 cm). Chondrolysis or femoral head necrosis was not observed. Screw revision was necessary in 22 cases because contact between the screw head and the cortex would have prevented continued longitudinal growth (unintentional epiphyseodesis).