Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 44(9): 1968-1977, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29936027

RESUMO

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US) plus superb microvascular imaging (SMI) compared with conventional US alone for diagnosing acute cholecystitis. We included 54 patients with suspected biliary disease. The SMI pixel count showing flow signal was measured in the region of interest of the gallbladder bed of the liver. Two radiologists independently evaluated imaging features and rated five-point diagnostic likelihood level before versus after the additional SMI using the cutoff SMI pixel count. The SMI pixel count was significantly higher in acute than in non-acute cholecystitis (169.84 vs. 27.48, p < 0.001). The optimal SMI cutoff pixel count for predicting acute cholecystitis obtained by receiver operating characteristic curve was 56.67(82.8% sensitivity, 92.0% specificity). The area under the curve value was significantly higher after the additional SMI than before (0.798-0.863 vs. 0.701-0.736, p < 0.05). US plus SMI could objectively improve diagnostic performance compared with conventional US for acute cholecystitis.


Assuntos
Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Vesícula Biliar/irrigação sanguínea , Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagem , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Microvasos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
2.
Ultrasound Q ; 33(1): 74-76, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28081019

RESUMO

Uterine cervical adenofibroma, a very rare benign neoplasm, has rarely been reported in imaging features in the English literature. Herein, we describe a case of uterine cervical adenofibroma that was depicted as a multilocular cystic lesion with enhanced solid portions.


Assuntos
Adenofibroma/diagnóstico por imagem , Colo do Útero/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenofibroma/cirurgia , Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Cistos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia
3.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 42(2): 442-450, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27654991

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic ability of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) compared to endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) as a standard reference, and investigate the factors influencing the detection of small gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) (<5 cm) on MDCT with stomach protocol. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 70 patients who were suspected with gastric SETs on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and underwent both EUS and computed tomographic (CT) scanning. EUS was performed by two gastroenterologists, and location, size, echotexture, echogenicity, and layer of origin were described when gastric SETs were detected on EUS. MDCTs were reviewed based on consensus of two radiologists blinded to the EUS result. Size, location, enhancement pattern, and contour of the lesion detected on CT were described. We calculated the diagnostic ability of CT compared to EUS with respect to detection of gastric SETs, and investigated the factors influencing detection of SETs on CT. We also used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to obtain optimal cut-off size for predicting CT visibility of small SETs. RESULTS: Of the 70 patients, who underwent both CT and EUS due to suspicious presence of SET on EGD, EUS detected 56 probable cases of SET and 14 cases of external compression. CT led to detection of 39 cases of SET out of the 56 cases. Sensitivity and specificity of CT was 69.6% and 100.0%, respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CT were 100.0% and 45.2%, respectively. There was a significant difference in mean size of CT-detected lesions compared to CT-invisible lesions (14.36 mm vs. 8.52 mm, p < 0.001), but no significant differences in terms of layer of origin and location between these two groups (p > 0.5) were observed. The ROC analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off value, also referred to prediction of CT visibility, was 10 mm. Out of 70 cases, 26 cases (37.14%) were identified as external compression or insignificant lesions such as lipoma, hemangioma, lymphangioma, or gastritis cystica on CT, and do not require regular follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Stomach CT shows good feasibility with respect to depiction of small SETs, especially in cases where size is larger than 10 mm. Henceforth, it is proposed that stomach CT would be a complimentary or problem-solving tool for SET in evaluating the presence of external compression and characterization of tumors.


Assuntos
Endossonografia , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...