Catastrophic healthcare payments and impoverishment in the occupied Palestinian territory.

BACKGROUND: Financial protection from the risks of ill health has globally recognized importance as a principal performance goal of any health system. This type of financial protection involves minimizing catastrophic payments for healthcare and their associated impoverishing effects. Realization of this performance goal is heavily influenced by factors related to the overall policy environment and sociopolitical context in each country. OBJECTIVES: To examine the incidence and intensity of catastrophic and impoverishing healthcare payments borne by Palestinian households between 1998 and 2007. The incidence and intensity of these effects are examined within the historically unique policy and socioeconomic context of the occupied Palestinian territory. METHODS: A healthcare payment was considered catastrophic if it exceeded 10% of household resources, or 40% of resources net of food expenditures. The impoverishing effect of healthcare was examined by comparing poverty incidence and intensity before and after healthcare payments. The data source was a series of annual expenditure and consumption surveys covering 1998 and 2004-7, and including representative samples of Palestinian households (n = 1231-3098, per year). Total household expenditure was used as a proxy for household level of resources; and the sum of household expenses on a comprehensive list of medical goods and services was used to estimate healthcare payments. RESULTS: While only around 1% of the surveyed households spent ≥40% of their total household expenditures (net of food expenses) on healthcare in 1998, the percentage was almost doubled in 2007. In terms of impoverishing effect, while 11.8% of surveyed households fell into deep poverty in 1998 due to healthcare payments, 12.5% of households entered deep poverty for the same reason in 2006. Over the same period, the monthly amount by which poor households failed to reach the deep poverty line due to healthcare payments increased from $US9.4 to $US12.9. CONCLUSIONS: The inability of the Palestinian healthcare system to protect against the financial risks of ill health could be attributed to the prevailing sociopolitical conditions of the occupied Palestinian territory, and to some intrinsic system characteristics. It is recommended that pro-poor financing schemes be pursued to mitigate the negative impact of the recurrent health shocks affecting Palestinian households.

Health equity in Lebanon: a microeconomic analysis.

BACKGROUND: The health sector in Lebanon suffers from high levels of spending and is acknowledged to be a source of fiscal waste. Lebanon initiated a series of health sector reforms which aim at containing the fiscal waste caused by high and inefficient public health expenditures. Yet these reforms do not address the issues of health equity in use and coverage of healthcare services, which appear to be acute. This paper takes a closer look at the micro-level inequities in the use of healthcare, in access, in ability to pay, and in some health outcomes. METHODS: We use data from the 2004/2005 Multi Purpose Survey of Households in Lebanon to conduct health equity analysis, including equity in need, access and outcomes. We briefly describe the data and explain some of its limitations. We examine, in turn, and using standardization techniques, the equity in health care utilization, the impact of catastrophic health payments on household wellbeing, the effect of health payment on household impoverishment, the equity implications of existing health financing methods, and health characteristics by geographical region. RESULTS: We find that the incidence of disability decreases steadily across expenditure quintiles, whereas the incidence of chronic disease shows the opposite pattern, which may be an indication of better diagnostics for higher quintiles. The presence of any health-related expenditure is regressive while the magnitude of out-of-pocket expenditures on health is progressive. Spending on health is found to be "normal" and income-elastic. Catastrophic health payments are likelier among disadvantaged groups (in terms of income, geography and gender). However, the cash amounts of catastrophic payments are progressive. Poverty is associated with lower insurance coverage for both private and public insurance. While the insured seem to spend an average of almost LL93,000 ($62) on health a year in excess of the uninsured, they devote a smaller proportion of their expenditures to health. CONCLUSIONS: The lowest quintiles of expenditures per adult have less of an ability to pay out-of-pocket for healthcare, and yet incur healthcare expenditures more often than the wealthy. They have lower rates of insurance coverage, causing them to spend a larger proportion of their expenditures on health, and further confirming our results on the vulnerability of the bottom quintiles.

Promoting Arab and Israeli cooperation: peacebuilding through health initiatives.

This article describes a positive experience in building Arab and Israeli cooperation through health initiatives. Over the past 10 years Israeli, Jordanian, and Palestinian health professionals have worked together through the Canada International Scientific Exchange Program (CISEPO). In the initial project, nearly 17,000 Arab and Israeli newborn babies were tested for early detection of hearing loss, an important health issue for the region. The network has grown to address additional needs, including mother-child health, nutrition, infectious diseases, and youth health. Our guiding model emphasises two goals: project-specific outcomes in health improvement, and broader effects on cross-border cooperation. Lessons learned from this experience and the model provide direction for ways that health professionals can contribute to peacebuilding.