RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fat embolism syndrome (FES) following major orthopedic injuries and surgeries is a well-known phenomenon where acute depression of right ventricular (RV) systolic function is a potential possibility. Clinical presentation of FES may vary from mild self-limiting nature to severe life-threatening multiorgan dysfunction syndrome with pulmonary manifestations being most common. AIMS: This study was aimed to know whether perioperative assessment of RV function by measuring tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) with point-of-care transthoracic echocardiogram will identify patients at risk of developing FES and its sequelae. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was carried out in 142 patients with femur fractures posted for correction surgeries of both genders who require intramedullary (IM) reaming. TAPSE was recorded four times perioperatively. Time taken for IM reaming was also recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Recorded data were analyzed using professional statistics package Epi Info 7.0 version for Windows. Descriptive data were represented as mean ± standard deviation for numeric variables, percentages, and proportions for categorical variables. Repeated-measure ANOVA was applied to assess the changes in TAPSE from baseline to immediate postoperative, after 6-h postoperative, and after 24-h postoperatively. Pearson's correlation was utilized to be applied to assess the relationship between TAPSE and other numerical variables. RESULTS: All four readings of TAPSE were well above 17 mm (mean of 19.06, 19.05, 19.04, and 19.04, respectively). Mean reaming time was found to be 6.92 min. None of the patients developed any postoperative pulmonary complications. CONCLUSION: Assessment of RV function can be done with relative ease using TAPSE as a noninvasive method without any complications. Reaming time not exceeding 12 min did not produce any changes in RV function as measured by TAPSE as well as any postoperative pulmonary complications.
RESUMO
CONTEXT: Optimization and providing excellent quality of postoperative analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy is a determinant factor of better clinical outcome, increases patient satisfaction, and allows early mobilization of the patient. AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of wound site infiltration (WSI) and ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) with 0.5% ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anesthesia. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred and ten patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated to two groups (WSI and TAP) of 55 patients in each. At the end of the surgical procedure, 2.5 mg/kg of the drug ropivacaine 0.5% was administered by an anesthesiologist through either of the routes of study. Visual analog score (VAS) assessment was done at every 30 min, for 1½ h, every 2 for 24 h postoperatively. Injection diclofenac sodium 75 mg intramuscularly was given whenever VAS was >3 as rescue analgesic. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Epi Info 7.0 version software for Windows was used. All analyses were performed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Mann-Whitney test was applied to detect the difference between the two groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Postoperative VAS scores in Group TAP were significantly reduced at 30 min, 1st h, 1 h 30 min, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, and 24 h (P < 0.001). The total doses of rescue analgesics administered were also low in the Group TAP (1.41 ± 0.538) with P < 0.0001 in comparison to Group WSI (2.24 ± 0.637) with P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of analgesia along with lesser rescue analgesic requirement and their side effects makes the TAPB, a good and safer option for lower abdominal gynecological surgeries. Both WSI and USG TAPB are effective in providing postoperative analgesia as a part of multimodal analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries. However, in our study the quality of analgesia along with lesser rescue analgesic requirement and their side effects makes the TAPB, a good and safer option for lower abdominal gynecological surgeries.
