Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nephrol Nurs J ; 46(5): 485-495, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31566344

RESUMO

Globally, home dialysis prevalence has been declining relative to the increase in end stage renal disease and renal replacement therapy. The goal of this study was to identify international perceptions and practices. A web-based questionnaire was disseminated to nephrology nurses in 30 home dialysis-prevalent nations. Global telehealth use was low (23%), contrasting with 83% respondents agreeing telehealth would improve care. Only 31% of all programs enabled patient training outside of normal working hours (e.g., nights and weekends), and 31% of all program patients had some cost reimbursement, with a significant difference between U.S. and non-U.S. programs (U.S. 11%, non-U.S. 59%, 2 = 93.6, p < 0.0001). Significant differences in the need for monthly clinic visits (U.S. 72%, non-US 44%, 2 = 83.7, p < 0.0001) were also found. Telehealth provision and patient training flexibility is limited, and patient cost reimbursement is low. Increased telehealth, patient cost reimbursement, and flexible training models may promote home dialysis growth.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Hemodiálise no Domicílio/enfermagem , Falência Renal Crônica/enfermagem , Enfermagem em Nefrologia , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Nephrol Nurs J ; 34(6): 599-606, 629; quiz 607, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18203568

RESUMO

Nephrologists and nephrology nurses have struggled with the technological, financial, and ethical concerns surrounding the life sustaining treatment of hemodialysis for as long as this treatment as been available. One of the overriding issues for the nephrology community has been appropriate utilization of this technology and the appropriate restraint for prescribing dialysis. Since the inception of dialysis, there has been discussion of guidelines for deciding who should receive and who should not receive this therapy. In 2000, a clinical guideline was developed to assist in directing the care of patients. The knowledge and acceptance of this guideline by nephrologists has been researched in the past. However, there is no data of knowledge and acceptance of the guideline by nephrology clinical nurses or nephrology nurse practitioners. A survey was conducted to begin to ascertain this information in order to better understand the perspectives of nephrology nurses.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Tomada de Decisões/ética , Seleção de Pacientes/ética , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Diálise Renal/ética , Especialidades de Enfermagem/ética , Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados/ética , Comportamento Cooperativo , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais/ética , Nefrologia/educação , Nefrologia/ética , Nefrologia/organização & administração , Enfermeiros Clínicos/educação , Enfermeiros Clínicos/ética , Enfermeiros Clínicos/psicologia , Profissionais de Enfermagem/educação , Profissionais de Enfermagem/ética , Profissionais de Enfermagem/psicologia , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Pesquisa Metodológica em Enfermagem , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Relações Profissional-Paciente/ética , Encaminhamento e Consulta/ética , Diálise Renal/enfermagem , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Sociedades de Enfermagem , Especialidades de Enfermagem/educação , Especialidades de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Inquéritos e Questionários , Assistência Terminal/ética , Estados Unidos , Suspensão de Tratamento/ética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...