High-dose cisplatin with dipyridamole in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A Grupo Oncológico Cooperativo del Sur study.

From March 1991 to October 1992, 41 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (20 stage IIIB and 21 stage IV) received a regimen consisting of cisplatin (CP) 100 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8, and dipyridamole (DPD) 100 mg p.o. 75 minutes before CP, and then at hours 6, 12, and 18 as first-line chemotherapy. Cycles were repeated every 28 days for a total of 3. Median age was 56 years (range: 40-70). All patients had a performance status 0 to 1 and a weight loss < or = 10%. Squamous-cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 19 patients; adenocarcinoma in 16, and large-cell carcinoma in 6. A total of 37 patients were fully evaluable for response, whereas 39 were assessable for toxicity. No complete responses were observed: 5 patients (14%) achieved partial response; 23 patients (62%) showed no change, and progressive disease was observed in 9 (24%). The median time to treatment failure was 4 months, whereas median survival was 8 months. The average dose intensity received at the end of the third course of therapy was 46 mg/m2/week. There were no drug-related deaths. Toxicity was mild to moderate, with a high incidence of ototoxicity (54%) and emesis (67%). In conclusion, these results failed to demonstrate any significant advantage from a high-dose CP regimen modulated by DPD in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine (VNB) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 1991 and February 1993, 45 patients with metastatic breast cancer were entered onto the study. Therapy consisted of VNB 30 mg/m2 diluted in 500 mL of normal saline administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion. Injections were repeated weekly until evidence of progressive disease (PD) or severe toxicity developed. RESULTS: One patient was considered not assessable for response. An objective response (OR) was observed in 18 of 44 patients (41%; 95% confidence interval, 26% to 56%). Three patients (7%) had a complete response (CR) and 15 (34%) had a partial response (PR). The median time to treatment failure for the entire group was 6 months (range, 1 to 15), and the median duration of response was 9 months (range, 1 to 15). The median survival duration has not been reached yet. There were no treatment-related deaths. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Leukopenia occurred in 35 patients (78%) and was grade 3 or 4 in 16 (36%). Phlebitis was observed in 19 of 29 patients (66%) who did not have central implantable venous systems. Fifteen patients (33%) developed peripheral neurotoxicity. Myalgia occurred in 20 patients (44%). CONCLUSION: VNB is an active drug against metastatic breast cancer with moderate toxicity, which justifies further evaluation in association with other agents.

Ifosfamide and mitoxantrone as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of ifosfamide (IFX) and mitoxantrone (MXN) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1990 and August 1991, 48 patients with metastatic breast cancer were entered onto the study. Therapy consisted of IFX 2 g/m2 given as a 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1 to 3; mesna 400 mg/m2 as an IV bolus immediately before and 4 hours after IFX administration and 2,000 mg orally 8 hours after IFX administration on days 1 to 3; and MXN 12 mg/m2 as an i.v. bolus on day 3. Cycles were repeated every 21 days until progressive disease (PD) or severe toxicity developed. RESULTS: One patient was considered not assessable for response. Objective regression (OR) was observed in 28 of 47 patients (60%; 95% confidence interval, 46% to 74%). Six patients (13%) had a complete response (CR) and 22 (47%) had a partial response (PR). The median time to treatment failure for the whole group was 9 months (range, 1 to 28); median survival was 19 months (range, 2 to 28). There were no treatment-related deaths. The limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Leukopenia occurred in 37 patients (77%) and was grade 3 or 4 in 19 patients (40%). Nausea and vomiting were observed in 38 patients (80%), mucositis in 16 patients (33%), and grade 2 hematuria in two patients (4%). Eight patients (16%) developed mild neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION: The combination of IFX plus MXN is an active regimen against metastatic breast cancer with moderate toxicity that deserves further evaluation.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical carcinoma.

Between October 1986 and August 1988, 33 previously untreated patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma were studied to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy combination consisting of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and bleomycin 25 mg/m2 IV in a 6-hour infusion on days 1-3. Cycles were repeated every 10 days for a total of three cycles, after which definitive radiation therapy (external and intracavitary) was administered. The median age was 47 years, and distribution by stages (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) was as follows: IIB, 12 subjects; IIIB, 19; and IVA, two. A multidisciplinary team conducted both staging and assessment of response to induction chemotherapy before the beginning of radiotherapy. Thirty-one women were fully evaluable for response and toxicity. No complete response was observed; seven subjects (23%) experienced a partial response, 18 (58%) had no change, and six (19%) showed progressive disease. Toxicity was mild to moderate and included nausea and vomiting, alopecia, hyperthermia, peripheral neurotoxicity, and anemia. We conclude that this regimen at this dosage and time interval produced a low number of objective regressions with a significant progression rate and is of doubtful value as neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Advanced colorectal carcinoma. A prospective randomized trial of sequential methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil alone.

One hundred and twenty-five previously untreated patients bearing metastatic or advanced recurrent (inoperable) colorectal carcinoma and measurable disease were prospectively randomized. Those in arm A received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 1,200 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 2 h, while those in arm B received methotrexate (MTX), 200 mg/m2 i.v. (push injection), followed 20 h later by 5-FU, 1,200 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 2 h, plus calcium leucovorin (LV), 25 mg i.m. every 6 h for eight doses beginning 24 h after MTX administration. Cycles were repeated every 15 days. All patients receiving treatment were evaluable for toxicity and survival, and 118 patients were evaluable for response. The objective regression rate (complete plus partial response) was 12% (7 of 58) in arm A and 28% (17 of 60) in arm B (p = 0.049). No change was observed in 24% (14 of 58) in arm A and in 35% (21 of 60) in arm B (p = 0.28), while progressive disease was registered in 64% (37 of 58) and 37% (22 of 60) in arms A and B, respectively (p = 0.006). Median duration of response was 3 months in arm A and 5 months in arm B (p = 0.39). The median survival was 8.3 months in arm A and 11.2 months in arm B (p = 0.25). No statistically significant differences were found when objective regression and survival were related to site of primary tumor, performance status, and number of involved organs. There were two drug-related deaths in arm B due to severe myelosuppression followed by mucositis and sepsis. Of nonhematologic toxicities, diarrhea was more frequently observed in arm B, as were mucositis and infectious complications. Our results indicate that the sequential schedule MTX-5-FU-LV with 20-h intervals between MTX and 5-FU is superior in terms of objective regression to 5-FU alone given at the dose and schedule used in the present study. However, MTX-5-FU-LV did not have a significant impact on survival.

Bone-only versus visceral-only metastatic pattern in breast cancer: analysis of 150 patients. A GOCS study. Grupo Oncológico Cooperativo del Sur.

The medical records of 510 patients with metastatic breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-seven patients with metastases confined to skeleton and 73 patients bearing visceral-only disease were identified. All patients had a disease-free interval greater than or equal to 6 months and received systemic therapy with any of the following modalities: chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, or chemohormonotherapy. The clinical features, response to treatment, and survival were analyzed and compared for both groups. Median survival of patients with osseous metastases was 28 months, while it was 13 months for those patients with a visceral pattern (p less than 0.001). Response rates to first and second line systemic therapy for both metastatic patterns showed no significant differences, suggesting a similar degree of sensitivity or resistance in both groups. Objective regression to first therapy was 45% in the group with bony disease and 41% among patients with visceral involvement; median duration of response was 16 months and 13 months, respectively. In both groups progressive disease conserved the original metastatic pattern in most patients. We conclude that although a superiority in survival was evident for the osseous metastatic pattern, for these patients efforts should be made to select the least aggressive therapy in order to avoid excessive toxicity. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Phase II trial of cytarabine, cisplatin and vindesine for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Thirty-two patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were entered in this study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a chemotherapy schedule including cisplatin (C) 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1-3; vindesine (V) 3 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, and cytarabine (ara-C) 15 mg/m2 subcutaneously every 12 hours on days 1-3 (total dose: 90 mg/m2). Cisplatin was administered simultaneously with one dose of ara-C. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Five patients out of 28 (18%) fully evaluable for response presented partial remissions. No complete response was observed. Median survival was 8 months and median duration of response was 4 months. Hematologic toxicity was severe in 3 patients. There were no toxicity-related deaths. Other adverse reactions included nausea and vomiting, alopecia and peripheral neuropathy. We conclude that this chemotherapy combination is marginally effective against NSCLC showing in this group of patients a low number of responses of short duration without a significant impact on survival.

Stage IV breast cancer: clinical course and survival of patients with osseous versus extraosseous metastases at initial diagnosis. The GOCS (Grupo Oncológico Cooperativo del Sur) experience.

The medical records of 414 patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated between 1978 and 1986 were reviewed and 44 women were identified as having stage IV disease when the primary breast lesion was detected. Of these 44 women, 25 had metastatic disease limited to the skeleton while 19 had extraosseous lesions only. The clinical features, response to therapy, and survival were analyzed and compared for both groups. The median survival of those patients with bone-only metastases was 52 months as compared with 13 months for those with extraskeletal lesions (p = 0.0025). The response rate to first-line systemic therapy was similar for both groups (47% for bone metastases and 44% for extraosseous metastases). The median duration of response was 14 months (range, 3-55 months) for patients with bone disease and 8 months (range, 4-43 months) for those with extraskeletal lesions. We conclude that patients with metastatic breast cancer confined to the skeleton at initial diagnosis tend to follow an indolent, chronic course with prolonged survival. Therefore the increase in response rate with aggressive chemotherapy should be balanced against its higher morbidity. Further studies are needed to confirm whether the better prognosis of these patients is determined by the anatomical confinement of the disease to the skeleton or merely reflects the influence of other prognostic factors.

Alternating versus sequential therapy in advanced breast cancer

La eficacia de dos esquemas quimioterápicos, sin resistencia cruzada e igualmente eficaces: adriamicina-vincristina (AV) y ciclofosfamida - methotrexate-5 - fluorouracilo = prednisona (CMFP) usados en diferentes secuencias, fue evaluada en términos de respuesta, duración, sobrevida y toxicidad. Desde diciembre de 1982 a febrero de 1984, 81 pacientes con carcinoma avanzado de mama fueron ingresadas a este estudio siendo randomizadas al azar a cada una de las ramas del estduio. Los datos del presente ensayo han sido evaluados hasta noviembre de 1985. En la rama A el tratamiento fue administrado en la secuencia inducción (AV) y mantenimiento (CMFP), mientras que en la rama B ambos esquemas (AV y CMFP) fueron alternados mensualmente. De los 41 pacientes de la rama A, 5% logró una remisión completa (RC), 49% remisión parcial (RP) y 27% progresión (P). En la rama B, de 40 pacientes tratados, 10% mostraron RC; 58% RP y no se observó progresión de enfermedad. Estos resultados no muestran diferencias significativas entre ambos esquemas, cuando se los compara en términos de regresión objetiva (RO), su duración y la sobrevida total. Sin embargo, cuando la enfermedad progresiva fue analizada se observó una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en favor de la rama B (p<0,0005). La toxicidad (hematológica y no hematológica fue similar en ambos grupos, con trastornos cardíacos más frecuentes en la rama B

Alternating versus sequential therapy in advanced breast cancer

La eficacia de dos esquemas quimioterápicos, sin resistencia cruzada e igualmente eficaces: adriamicina-vincristina (AV) y ciclofosfamida - methotrexate-5 - fluorouracilo = prednisona (CMFP) usados en diferentes secuencias, fue evaluada en términos de respuesta, duración, sobrevida y toxicidad. Desde diciembre de 1982 a febrero de 1984, 81 pacientes con carcinoma avanzado de mama fueron ingresadas a este estudio siendo randomizadas al azar a cada una de las ramas del estduio. Los datos del presente ensayo han sido evaluados hasta noviembre de 1985. En la rama A el tratamiento fue administrado en la secuencia inducción (AV) y mantenimiento (CMFP), mientras que en la rama B ambos esquemas (AV y CMFP) fueron alternados mensualmente. De los 41 pacientes de la rama A, 5% logró una remisión completa (RC), 49% remisión parcial (RP) y 27% progresión (P). En la rama B, de 40 pacientes tratados, 10% mostraron RC; 58% RP y no se observó progresión de enfermedad. Estos resultados no muestran diferencias significativas entre ambos esquemas, cuando se los compara en términos de regresión objetiva (RO), su duración y la sobrevida total. Sin embargo, cuando la enfermedad progresiva fue analizada se observó una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en favor de la rama B (p<0,0005). La toxicidad (hematológica y no hematológica fue similar en ambos grupos, con trastornos cardíacos más frecuentes en la rama B (AU)

High-dose alpha-tocopherol as a preventive of doxorubicin-induced alopecia.

The effectiveness of alpha-tocopherol acetate as a preventive of doxorubicin-induced alopecia was evaluated in 20 patients with different types of solid tumors. All received therapy containing doxorubicin in a dose range of 50-60 mg/m2/cycle of treatment. The observed hair loss was severe in 90% and moderate in 10% of the patients. No protective activity of alpha-tocopherol was demonstrated in this trial.

Sequential therapy with methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Twenty-nine patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma were entered in this study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a sequential chemotherapeutic schedule with methotrexate (MTX), 200 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) (push injection) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 1,200 mg/m2 in continuous IV infusion, using a 20-hour time interval. All patients received calcium leucovorin (LV), 25 mg, intramuscularly (IM) every six hours for eight doses beginning 24 hours after methotrexate administration. Courses were administered every 15 days. Of the 24 patients evaluable for response, 11 (46%) had major objective regressions (one complete remission [CR] and ten partial remissions [PR]). The survival rate of patients who responded to treatment was 60% at 16 months, whereas patients with no change and those in whom the disease progressed had a median survival of 9 months and 3 months, respectively. The median duration of response has not yet been reached in patients who presented objective tumor regression, and was 7.5 months in those with no change. Significant differences were found between objective regression and no change (P less than .0005) and between no change and tumor progression (P less than .05). All patients were evaluable for toxicity. There were three toxic-related deaths (10%) because of severe myelosuppresion, sepsis, and hemorrhage. These promising results, despite important toxicity, reveal the synergism between the two chemotherapeutic agents and also indicate that the response rate achieved could be a consequence of the 20-hour interval and high dose of 5-FU. Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal time interval and the adequate 5-FU dose.