Overlapping Physiologic Signs of Sepsis and Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity After Traumatic Brain Injury: Exploring A Clinical Conundrum.

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) occurs in a subset of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and is associated with worse outcomes. Sepsis is also associated with worse outcomes after TBI and shares several physiologic features with PSH, potentially creating diagnostic confusion and suboptimal management of each. This is the first study to directly investigate the interaction between PSH and infection using robust diagnostic criteria. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with TBI admitted to a level I trauma center intensive care unit with hospital length of stay of at least 2 weeks. From January 2016 to July 2018, 77 patients diagnosed with PSH were 1:1 matched by age and Glasgow Coma Scale to 77 patients without PSH. Trauma infectious diseases subspecialists prospectively documented assessments corroborating diagnoses of infection. Extracted data including incidence, timing, classification, and anatomical source of infections were compared according to PSH diagnosis. We also evaluated daily PSH clinical feature severity scores and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria and compared values for patients with and without confirmed infection, stratified by PSH diagnosis. RESULTS: During the first 2 weeks of hospitalization, there were no differences in rates of suspected (62%) nor confirmed (48%) infection between patients with PSH and controls. Specific treatments for PSH were initiated on median hospital day 7 and for confirmed infections on median hospital day 8. SIRS criteria could identify infection only in patients who were not diagnosed with PSH. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of brain injury-induced autonomic nervous system dysregulation, the initiation and continuation of antimicrobial therapy is a challenging clinical decision, as standard physiologic markers of sepsis do not distinguish infected from noninfected patients with PSH, and these entities often present around the same time. Clinicians should be aware that PSH is a potential driver of SIRS, and familiarity with its diagnostic criteria as proposed by the PSH assessment measure is important. Management by a multidisciplinary team attentive to these issues may reduce rates of inappropriate antibiotic usage and misdiagnoses.

Mortality Risk Assessment in COVID-19 Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: A life-threatening complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) refractory to conventional management. Venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (VV-ECMO) is used to support patients with ARDS in whom conventional management fails. Scoring systems to predict mortality in VV-ECMO remain unvalidated in COVID-19 ARDS. This report describes a large single-center experience with VV-ECMO in COVID-19 and assesses the utility of standard risk calculators. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective database of all patients with COVID-19 who underwent VV-ECMO cannulation between March 15 and June 27, 2020 at a single academic center was performed. Demographic, clinical, and ECMO characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; survivor and nonsurvivor cohorts were compared by using univariate and bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Forty patients who had COVID-19 and underwent ECMO were identified. Of the 33 patients (82.5%) in whom ECMO had been discontinued at the time of analysis, 18 patients (54.5%) survived to hospital discharge, and 15 (45.5%) died during ECMO. Nonsurvivors presented with a statistically significant higher Prediction of Survival on ECMO Therapy (PRESET)-Score (mean ± SD, 8.33 ± 0.8 vs 6.17 ± 1.8; P = .001). The PRESET score demonstrated accurate mortality prediction. All patients with a PRESET-Score of 6 or lowers survived, and a score of 7 or higher was associated with a dramatic increase in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that favorable outcomes are possible in patients with COVID-19 who undergo ECMO at high-volume centers. This study demonstrated an association between the PRESET-Score and survival in patients with COVID-19 who underwent VV-ECMO. Standard risk calculators may aid in appropriate selection of patients with COVID-19 ARDS for ECMO.

Rice body formation due to Haemophilus parainfluenza-associated chronic arthropathy.

A 68-year-old woman with a medical history significant for psoriatic arthritis was found to have an enlarged, painful lump on her left hip 15 months after intramedullary rod placement for a left subtrochanteric femur fracture sustained in a fall. Histopathological findings showed rice body formation (RBF) with concurrent H. parainfluenza. RBF is a relatively rare arthropathy of a subset of chronic inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis or tuberculous arthropathy. RBF associated with psoriatic arthritis or orthopedic hardware placement has been reported in a handful of cases in the literature but there has not been any definitive evidence for RBF as a result of Haemophilus parainfluenza infections and is a rather unusual characteristic of this case.

Intoxication and overdose should not preclude veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

INTRODUCTION: Acute intoxication (AI) related morbidity and mortality are increasing in the United States. For patients with severe respiratory failure in the setting of an acute ingestion, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) can provide salvage therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with overdose-related need for VV ECMO. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients admitted to a specialty VV ECMO unit between August 2014 and August 2018. Patients were stratified by those whose indication for VV ECMO was directly related to an acute ingestion (alcohol, illicit drug, or prescription drug overdose) and those with unrelated diagnoses. Demographics, pre-cannulation clinical characteristics, ECMO parameters, and outcomes data was collected and analyzed with parametric and non-parametric statistics as indicated. RESULTS: 189 patients were enrolled with 27 (14%) diagnosed with AI. Patients requiring VV ECMO for an AI were younger, had lower median BMI and PaO2/FiO2, and higher RESP scores than non-AI patients (p = 0.002, 0.01, 0.03 and 0.01). There was no difference in pre-cannulation pH, lactate, or SOFA scores between the two groups (p = 0.24, 0.5, 0.6). There was no difference in survival to discharge (p = 0.95). Among survivors, there was no difference in ECMO time or hospital stay (p = 0.24, 0.07). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate no survival difference for patients with and without an AI-related need for VV ECMO. AI patients should be supported with VV ECMO when traditional therapies fail despite potential stigma against acceptance on referral.

Breathing Life Back Into the Kidney-Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in patients supported with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). Secondary outcomes included mortality and the need for hemodialysis on hospital discharge. We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to a specialty unit on VV ECMO between August 2014 and August 2018. Trauma and bridge to lung transplant patients were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, pre-ECMO, ECMO, and renal replacement therapy outcome data were collected and analyzed with parametric and nonparametric statistics as appropriate. One hundred eighty-seven patients were enrolled. Median age was 45 (32, 55) years; precannulation pH, 7.21 (7.12, 7.30); PaO2/FiO2 ratio, 69 (56, 86); respiratory ECMO survival prediction score, 3 (0, 5); sequential organ failure assessment score, 12 (10, 14); and creatinine, 1.45 (0.93, 2.35) mg/dL. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 74.6%. Ninety-four (50.3%) patients had CRRT while on VV ECMO. Median time on CRRT was 14 (7, 21) days with 59 (61.4%) of these patients surviving to hospital discharge. Four (6.8%) patients, none with documented preexisting renal disease, required hemodialysis on discharge. CRRT patients had a statistically higher precannulation sequential organ failure assessment score, creatinine, total bilirubin and lower precannulation pH, respiratory ECMO survival prediction score, and platelet count compared with non-CRRT patients. Survival was 61.4% vs. 88.1% (p < 0.001). More than half of our patients received CRRT while on VV ECMO. CRRT was used in a more critically ill patient population and was associated with higher in-hospital mortality. However, for patients who survived to hospital discharge, the majority have full renal recovery.

Outcomes of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation When Stratified by Age: How Old Is Too Old?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival to hospital discharge for patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) when stratified by age. We performed a retrospective study at single, academic, tertiary care center intensive care unit for VV ECMO. All patients, older than 17 years of age, on VV ECMO admitted to a specialized intensive care unit for the management of VV ECMO between August 2014 and May 2018 were included in the study. Trauma and bridge-to-lung transplant patients were excluded for this analysis. Demographics, pre-ECMO and ECMO data were collected. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge when stratified by age. Secondary outcomes included time on VV ECMO and hospital length of stay (HLOS). One hundred eighty-two patients were included. Median P/F ratio at time of cannulation was 69 [56-85], and respiratory ECMO survival prediction (RESP) score was 3 [1-5]. Median time on ECMO was 319 [180-567] hours. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 75.8%. Lowess and cubic spline curves demonstrated an inflection point associated with increased mortality at age >45 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly greater survival in patients <45 years of age (p = 0.0001). Survival to hospital discharge for those

Methylprednisolone may be associated with improved lung compliance in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

INTRODUCTION: Methylprednisolone has been used for acute respiratory distress syndrome with variable results. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in acute respiratory distress syndrome has increased. Occasionally, both are used. We hypothesized that methylprednisolone could improve lung compliance and ease weaning from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients in our veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation unit treated with methylprednisolone over a 20 month period. Methylprednisolone was initiated for inability to wean off veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Dynamic compliance (Cdyn) was calculated at cannulation, methylprednisolone initiation, and decannulation. Demographics, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-specific data, and ventilator data were collected. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test for differences in dynamic compliance. RESULTS: A total of 12 veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients received methylprednisolone. Mean age was 50 (±15) years. Seven had influenza. Methylprednisolone was started on median Day 16 (interquartile range: 11-22) of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In total, 10 patients had veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation on median Day 12 (7-22) after methylprednisolone initiation. Two patients died before decannulation. The 10 decannulated patients had initial median dynamic compliance (mL × cm H2O-1) of 12 (7-23), then 16 (10-24) at methylprednisolone initiation, and then 44 (34-60) at decannulation. Dynamic compliance was higher at decannulation than methylprednisolone initiation (p = 0.002), and unchanged from cannulation to methylprednisolone initiation for all patients (p = 0.97). A total of 10 patients had significant infections. None had significant gastrointestinal bleed or wound healing issues. CONCLUSION: Methylprednisolone may be associated with improved compliance in acute respiratory distress syndrome allowing for decannulation from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. High rates of infection are associated with methylprednisolone use in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Further studies are required to identify appropriate patient selection for methylprednisolone use in patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Pilot study evaluating a non-titrating, weight-based anticoagulation scheme for patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: There is no universally accepted algorithm for anticoagulation in patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare a non-titrating weight-based heparin infusion to that of a standard titration algorithm. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized non-blinded study of patients: Arm 1-standard practice of titrating heparin to activated partial thromboplastin times goal of 45-55 seconds, and Arm 2-a non-titrating weight-based (10 units/kg/h) infusion. Primary outcome was need for oxygenator/circuit changes. Secondary outcomes included differences in hemolysis and bleeding episodes. Descriptive statistics were performed for the continuous data, and primary and secondary outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: Six patients were randomized to Arm 1 and four to Arm 2. There was no difference in age, pH, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, peak inspiratory pressure, positive end expiratory pressure, mean airway pressure at time of cannulation, time on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or survival to hospital discharge in the two arms. Arm 1 had a statistically higher median activated partial thromboplastin times (48 (43, 52) vs 38 (35, 42), p < 0.008) and lower LDH (808 units/L (727, 1112) vs 940 units/L (809, 1137), p = 0.02) than Arm 2. There was no difference in plasma hemoglobin (4.3 (2.5, 8.7) vs 4.3 (3.0, 7.3), p = 0.65) between the two arms. There was no difference in mean oxygenator/circuit change, transfused packed red blood cell, or documented bleeding complications per patient in each arm (p = 0.56, 0.43, 0.77, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, a non-titrating, weight-based heparin infusion appears safe and as effective in preventing veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit thrombotic complications as compared to a titration algorithm. Larger studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Failure: How Long Is Too Long?

The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) in adults with respiratory failure has steadily increased during the past decade. Recent literature has demonstrated variable outcomes with the use of extended ECMO. The purpose of this study is to evaluate survival to hospital discharge in patients with extended ECMO runs compared with patients with short ECMO runs at a tertiary care ECMO referral center. We retrospectively reviewed all patients on VV ECMO for respiratory failure between August 2014 and February 2017. Bridge to lung transplant, post-lung transplant, and post-cardiac surgery patients were excluded. Patients were stratified by duration of ECMO: extended ECMO, defined as >504 hours; short ECMO as ≤504 hours. Demographics, pre-ECMO data, ECMO-specific data, and outcomes were analyzed. One hundred and thirty-nine patients with respiratory failure were treated with VV ECMO. Overall survival to discharge was 76%. Thirty-one (22%) patients had extended ECMO runs with an 87% survival to discharge. When compared with patients with short ECMO runs, there was no difference in median age, body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/ fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (P/F), and survival to discharge. However, time from intubation to cannulation for ECMO was significantly longer in patients with extended ECMO runs. (p = 0.008). Our data demonstrate that patients with extended ECMO runs have equivalent outcomes to those with short ECMO runs. Although the decision to continue ECMO support in this patient population is multifactorial, we suggest that time on ECMO should not be the sole factor in this challenging decision.

Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO) for Acute Respiratory Failure Following Injury: Outcomes in a High-Volume Adult Trauma Center with a Dedicated Unit for VV ECMO.

INTRODUCTION: The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) has increased over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in adult trauma patients requiring VV ECMO. METHODS: Data were collected on adult trauma patients admitted between January 1, 2015, and November 1, 2016. Demographics, injury-specific data, ECMO data, and survival to discharge were recorded. Medians [interquartile range (IQR)] were reported. A p value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Eighteen patients required VV ECMO during the study period. Median age was 28.5 years (IQR 24-43). Median injury severity score (ISS) was 27 (IQR 21-41); median PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) prior to ECMO cannulation was 61 (IQR 50-70). Median time from injury to cannulation was 3 (IQR 0-6) days. Median duration of ECMO was 266 (IQR 177-379) hours. Survival to discharge was 78%. Survivors had a significantly higher ISS (p = 0.03), longer intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS) (p < 0.0004), hospital LOS (p < 0.000004), and time on the ventilator (p < 0.0003). Median time of injury to cannulation was significantly longer in patients who survived to discharge (p = 0.01). There was no difference in P/F ratio prior to cannulation (p = ns). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated improved outcome of patients requiring VV ECMO following injury compared to historical data. Although shorter time from injury to cannulation for VV ECMO was associated with death, select patients who meet criteria for VV ECMO early following injury should be referred/transferred to a tertiary care facility that specializes in trauma and ECMO care.

Incidence of Cannula-Associated Deep Vein Thrombosis After Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Limited literature regarding the incidence of cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis (CaDVT) after veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) exists. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of post decannulation CaDVT and identify any associated risk factors. Forty-eight patients were admitted between August 2014 and January 2016 to the Lung Rescue Unit were included in the study. Protocolized anticoagulation levels (partial thromboplastin time [PTT] 45-55 seconds) and routine post decannulation DVT screening were in place during the study period. Forty-one (85.4%) patients had CaDVT. Of those with CaDVT, 31 (76%) patients were treated with full anti-coagulation therapy. Thirty-four (76%) patients with right internal jugular (RIJ) cannulation had CaDVT at cannula site. Twenty-five (61%) patients had CaDVT in the lower extremity (18 associated right femoral vein cannulation and 7 left femoral vein cannulation). Eighteen (44%) patients had both upper and lower extremity CaDVT. Overall, patients with CaDVT tended to be older, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and on ECMO longer (p = NS). Mean PTT during time on ECMO between patients that did and did not have CaDVT did not differ. No clinical evidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) was seen.

The lung rescue unit-Does a dedicated intensive care unit for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation improve survival to discharge?

BACKGROUND: The use of venovenous extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) for acute respiratory failure (ARF)/acute respiratory (ARDS) has increased since 2009. Specialized units for patients requiring VV ECMO are not standard and patients are often cohorted with other critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to report the outcome of adult patients admitted in 2015 to the lung rescue unit, which, to our knowledge, is the first intensive care unit in the United States that has been specifically created to provide care for patients requiring VV ECMO. METHODS: Data were collected on all patients admitted to the lung rescue unit on VV ECMO between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2015. Demographics, medical history, pre-ECMO data, indication for VV ECMO as well as duration of ECMO and survival to decannulation and discharge were recorded. Means (± standard deviation) and medians (interquartile range [IQR]) were reported when appropriate. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were enrolled. Median age was 48 years (IQR, 32-57). Median PaO2/FIO2 ratio before cannulation was 66 (IQR, 53-86). Median ventilator days before cannulation was 2 (IQR, 1-4). Median time on VV ECMO for all patients was 311 hours (IQR, 203-461). Thirty-eight (78%) patients were successfully decannulated with 35 (71%) patients surviving to hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: The use of VV ECMO for ARF/ARDS is increasing. We have demonstrated that a dedicated multidisciplinary intensive care unit for the purpose of providing standardized care with specialized trained providers can improve survival to discharge for patients that require VV ECMO for ARF/ARDS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level V.

Infectious complications in GSW's through the gastrointestinal tract into the spine.

BACKGROUND: Trans-gastrointestinal tract GSW's to the spine are devastating injuries with significant potential for infectious complications. We sought to address antimicrobial management of these injuries. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all patients with penetrating trauma through the GI tract into the spine admitted to a level I trauma centre from 1/02 to 12/09. Patients were excluded if they died within 24h. Patients received 24-48 h of peri-operative prophylactic antibiotics, except in damage control where antibiotics were continued until packs were removed. RESULTS: 51 patients were included. 94% were male with a mean age of 27 years. The mean ISS was 28 (9-50). The mean length of stay was 19 days (3-53) and mortality was 9.8%. The mean follow up period was 277 days (0-1765). There were 12 gastric, 25 small bowel, 26 colonic, and 4 esophageal injuries. There were 48 exploratory laparotomies, of which 12 were damage control procedures. 18 patients had no infections. There were 20 abdominal infections and 7 surgical wound infections. There were 23 infections not related to the abdomen. One patient developed a CNS infection 4 days after discharge despite receiving a two week course of piperacillin/tazobactam for Escherichia coli bacteremia during his initial hospital stay. There were no other CNS infections. CONCLUSION: Despite the potential for significant deep infections of the spine, standard antimicrobial prophylaxis is sufficient for the initial management of these patients.

A hidden reservoir of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in patients newly admitted to an acute rehabilitation hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To find hidden reservoirs of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) via active surveillance cultures for MRSA and VRE in newly admitted patients. DESIGN: A prospective, cohort, screening study. The period of surveillance was 3 months in the winter of 2006-2007. SETTING: A freestanding academic and community rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 540 consecutive patients admitted to a freestanding rehabilitation hospital. METHODS: All of the patients were screened for MRSA and VRE upon admission to the hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of new patients identified with either MRSA or VRE colonization. RESULTS: A total of 540 patients were screened, of whom 42 (7.8%) had pre-existing MRSA status, 8 (1.5%) had pre-existing VRE status, and 10 (1.9%) had a history of positive results for both MRSA and VRE. Of the 480 patients without pre-existing positive cultures, admission swabs were positive for MRSA in 37 patients (7.7%), swabs were positive for VRE in 33 patients (6.9%), and swabs for both MRSA and VRE were newly positive for 7 patients (1.5%). Therefore 16% of the patients without a history of MRSA or VRE had a new finding of MRSA or VRE. Regression analysis revealed that prior bacteremia was a risk factor for MRSA; diabetes mellitus and a history of pneumonia and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use were risk factors for VRE. CONCLUSION: We found a 16% incidence of a hidden reservoir of multiple drug-resistant organisms in patients admitted to rehabilitation hospitals. We believe that all patients admitted to a rehabilitation facility should be screened for MRSA and VRE.

Epidural abscess due to spinal cord stimulator trial.

Spinal cord stimulation is increasingly utilized as a treatment to alleviate low back pain and lumbar radiculopathy, particularly in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. We present an illustrative case of early, rapidly progressive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection after a brief stimulator trial lead implantation. Operators should maintain a high level of suspicion for deep infection, including epidural abscess, even when only minor symptoms and signs are present. Because of the poor ability to clear infections in the presence of a retained foreign body, the device must be explanted immediately. Subsequent surgical intervention, however, may nevertheless still be needed. While a variety of bacteria may cause epidural abscess, methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and increasingly, MRSA and community-associated MRSA, are the most likely etiologic organisms.