Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Subst Use Addict Treat ; 148: 209004, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36931605

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current methadone titration guidelines recommend low initial doses (15-40 mg) and slow increases (10-20 mg every 3 to 7 days) to prevent dose accumulation and oversedation until reaching a target therapeutic dose between 60 and 120 mg. These guidelines were created primarily for outpatient settings in the pre-fentanyl era. Methadone initiations are becoming more common in hospitals, but no titration guidelines exist specific to this treatment setting, which has capacity for increased monitoring. Our objective was to assess the safety of rapid inpatient methadone initiation with regard to mortality, overdose, and serious adverse outcomes both in-hospital and postdischarge. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational, cohort study conducted at an urban, academic medical center in the United States. We queried our electronic medical record for hospitalized adults with moderate to severe opioid use disorder admitted between July 1, 2018, and November 30, 2021. Included patients were rapidly initiated on methadone with 30 mg as the initial dose and 10 mg increases daily until reaching 60 mg. The study extracted thirty-day post-discharge opioid overdose and mortality data from the CRISP database. RESULTS: Twenty-five hospitalized patients received rapid methadone initiation during the study period. The study had no major adverse events including in-hospital or thirty-day post-discharge overdoses or deaths. The study did have two instances of sedation, but neither led to methadone dose holds. There were no instances of QTc prolongation. The study had one patient-directed discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a small subset of hospitalized patients tolerated rapid methadone initiation. More rapid titrations can be utilized in a monitored inpatient setting to retain patients in the hospital and allow providers to account for increased tolerance in the fentanyl era. Guidelines should be updated to reflect the capabilities of inpatient settings to safely initiate and rapidly titrate methadone. Further work should determine optimal methadone initiation protocols in the fentanyl era.


Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Metadona , Adulto , Humanos , Assistência ao Convalescente , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Overdose de Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Fentanila/efeitos adversos , Pacientes Internados , Metadona/efeitos adversos , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
2.
J Hosp Med ; 18(2): 169-176, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36349984

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) among people who inject drugs (PWID) is rising worldwide. Multiple clinical guidelines differ on the management of this condition, and few guidelines comment on treatment for primary substance use disorder (SUD). A comprehensive comparison of these guidelines is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To perform a critical review identifying key differences in clinical guideline recommendations for treating IE among PWID, focusing on the inclusion of recommendations for SUD treatment and the presence of stigmatizing language. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Recently published, English-language, society-developed clinical guidelines for the treatment of IE among PWID. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: PubMed, Google Scholar, and CINAHL Plus databases. CHARTING METHODS: In line with Arksey and O'Malley's framework, a scoping review was adapted using Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Two reviewers independently performed database searches for clinical guidelines published between 2007 and 2020 that commented on the management of IE among PWID. RESULTS: Ten clinical guidelines were included in the final analysis. Treatment recommendations varied with some societies proposing nonstandard care due to concern for return to drug use. Three guidelines include reference to addiction treatment. Only one guideline specifies the use of opioid agonist therapy for treating opioid use disorder and identifies the benefits of an addiction specialist consultation. Acute withdrawal management is not mentioned in any guideline. All guidelines utilized stigmatizing language to describe PWID. CONCLUSIONS: Most guidelines do not address SUD treatment, despite its effectiveness in reducing adverse health outcomes. Future guidelines should address SUD treatment using patient-first language.


Assuntos
Usuários de Drogas , Endocardite , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Endocardite/tratamento farmacológico , Endocardite/etiologia , Endocardite/epidemiologia , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/complicações , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/complicações
3.
Psychiatr Clin North Am ; 45(3): 335-346, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36055727

RESUMO

The incidence of opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose deaths is rising yearly within the United States. Many cases are associated with illicitly manufactured fentanyl use. In addition to offering patients medications for OUD (methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone), the approach to this epidemic should involve increasing provider awareness and education about substance use disorders, expanding urine toxicology screens to test for fentanyl, and using low-threshold treatment approaches.


Assuntos
Buprenorfina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...