Community Paramedicine Intervention Reduces Hospital Readmission and Emergency Department Utilization for Patients with Cardiopulmonary Conditions.

OBJECTIVE: Patients discharged from the hospital with diagnoses of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have high rates of readmission. We sought to quantify the impact of a community paramedicine (CP) intervention on hospital readmission and emergency department (ED) and clinic utilization for patients discharged with these conditions and to calculate the difference in healthcare costs. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational cohort study with a matched historical control. The groups were matched for qualifying diagnosis, age, gender, and ZIP code. The intervention group received 1-2 home visits per week by a community paramedic for 30 days. We calculated the number of all-cause hospital readmissions and ED and clinic visits, and used descriptive statistics to compare cohorts. RESULTS: Included in the study were 78 intervention patients and 78 controls. Compared to controls, fewer subjects in the CP cohort had experienced a readmission at 120 days (34.6% vs 64.1%, P < 0.001) and 210 days (43.6% vs 75.6%, P < 0.001) after discharge. At 210 days the CP cohort had 40.9% fewer total hospital admissions, saving 218 bed days and $410,428 in healthcare costs. The CP cohort had 40.7% fewer total ED visits. CONCLUSION: Patients who received a post-hospital community paramedic intervention had fewer hospital readmissions and ED visits, which resulted in saving 218 bed days and decreasing healthcare costs by $410,428. Incorporation of a home CP intervention of 30 days in this patient population has the potential to benefit payors, hospitals, and patients.

Community-based interventions for detection and management of diabetes and hypertension in underserved communities: a mixed-methods evaluation in Brazil, India, South Africa and the USA.

INTRODUCTION: As non-communicable disease (NCD) burden rises worldwide, community-based programmes are a promising strategy to bridge gaps in NCD care. The HealthRise programme sought to improve hypertension and diabetes management for underserved communities in nine sites across Brazil, India, South Africa and the USA between 2016 and 2018. This study presents findings from the programme's endline evaluation. METHODS: The evaluation utilises a mixed-methods quasi-experimental design. Process indicators assess programme implementation; quantitative data examine patients' biometric measures and qualitative data characterise programme successes and challenges. Programme impact was assessed using the percentage of patients meeting blood pressure and A1c treatment targets and tracking changes in these measures over time. RESULTS: Almost 60 000 screenings, most of them in India, resulted in 1464 new hypertension and 295 new diabetes cases across sites. In Brazil, patients exhibited statistically significant reductions in blood pressure and A1c. In Shimla, India, and in South Africa, country with the shortest implementation period, there were no differences between patients served by facilities in HealthRise areas relative to comparison areas. Among participating patients with diabetes in Hennepin and Ramsey counties and hypertension patients in Hennepin County, the percentage of HealthRise patients meeting treatment targets at endline was significantly higher relative to comparison group patients. Qualitative analysis identified linking different providers, services, communities and information systems as positive HealthRise attributes. Gaps in health system capacities and sociodemographic factors, including poverty, low levels of health education and limited access to nutritious food, are remaining challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from Brazil and the USA indicate that the HealthRise model has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Short implementation periods and strong emphasis on screening may have contributed to the lack of detectable differences in other sites. Community-based care cannot deliver its full potential if sociodemographic and health system barriers are not addressed in tandem.