RESUMO
A high density sugar beet RFLP map with an average distance of 1.5 cM between markers has been constructed. The map covers 621 cM and includes 413 markers distributed over the nine linkage groups of sugar beet. The map is based on two F2 populations representing two different pairs of parents. The two sets of data were integrated into a single map using 90 markers that were common to both data sets. The quality of the map was assessed in several ways. The common markers were used to investigate how often the loci had been mapped in the same order in the two F2 populations. For closely situated markers (<1.5 cM) the order specified in the map is uncertain, but for markers separated by more than 2 cM the locus order is highly reliable. The error rate of the overall process was estimated at 0.3% by independently repeating the analysis of 41 markers. The map is comparatively short, with a map length corresponding to approximately 1.4 crossovers per bivalent. Another feature of the map is a high degree of clustering of markers along the linkage groups. With the possible exception of linkage group 2, each linkage group shows one major cluster, which in most cases is situated in the centre of the linkage group. Our interpretation is that sugar beet, in comparison with most other species, has an extreme localization of recombination. Key words : sugar beet, linkage, RFLP, clustering.
RESUMO
RFLP and RAPD markers were evaluated and compared for their ability to determine genetic relationships in a set of three B. napus breeding lines. Using a total of 50 RFLP and 92 RAPD markers, the relatedness between the lines was determined. In total, the RFLP and the RAPD analysis revealed more than 500 and 400 bands, respectively. The relative frequencies of loci with allele differences were estimated from the band data. The RFLP and RAPD marker sets detected very similar relationships among the three lines, consistent with known pedigree data. Bootstrap analyses showed that the use of approximately 30 probes or primers would have been sufficient to achieve these relationships. This indicates that RAPD markers have the same resolving power as RFLP markers when used on exactly the same set of B. napus genotypes. Since RAPD markers are easier and quicker to use, these markers may be preferred in applications where the relationships between closely-related breeding lines are of interest. The use of RAPD markers in fingerprinting applications may, however, not be warranted, and this is discussed in relation to the reliability of RAPD markers.