Comparison of the Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil on Cognition State After Cataract Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is a potent and highly specific α2-adrenoreceptor agonist that induces sedative and analgesic effects over a short-term period. As a result of these benefits, dexmedetomidine may be a better alternative than other available drugs for keeping the patient's cognition state in an acceptable condition after outpatient ophthalmic surgeries. OBJECTIVES: This randomized study was conducted to compare the sedative effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on the cognitive state of patients who have undergone cataract surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients who were candidates for cataract surgery under local anesthesia received either dexmedetomidine (50 patients; D group) or remifentanil (50 patients; R group) in a double-blind, randomized study. The baseline cardiovascular status and mini mental state examination (MMSE) score for each patient were recorded. As a loading dose, dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg) and remifentanil (0.1 µg/kg) were infused at 10 minutes and 5 minutes before topical anesthesia, respectively. Subsequently, the maintenance dose was administered at 0.2 µg/kg/hour and 0.05 µg/kg/minutes in the D and R groups, respectively. The surgical procedure was begun when the bispectral index (BIS) reached 70 - 80. MMSE test was done at a postanesthetic care unit (PACU) 120 minutes after the discontinuation of the drug. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the MMSE scores of the two groups before surgery (P = 0.6), but the MMSE test conducted at the PACU revealed significantly better cognitive outcomes in the D group than in the R group in patients younger and older than 65 years (P = 0.03 and P = 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that dexmedetomidine may be a suitable agent for sedation in cataract surgery because it results in a more favorable postoperative cognitive status than remifentanil. Likewise, dexmedetomidine had no significant adverse effects on cardiovascular or respiratory systems.

Comparison between Total Parenteral Nutrition Vs. Partial Parenteral Nutrition on Serum Lipids Among Chronic Ventilator Dependent Patients; A Multi Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is very common among chronically hospitalized patients, especially those in the intensive care unit (ICU). Identifying the patients at risk and providing suitable nutritional support can prevent and/or overcome malnutrition in them. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and partial parenteral nutrition (PPN) are two common routes to deliver nutrition to hospitalized patients. We conducted a multicenter, prospective double blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the benefits and compare their adverse effects of each method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 97 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the inclusion criteria. Serum protein, serum albumin, serum transferrin, and total lymphocyte count were measured on days 7 and 14. RESULTS: We did not find any statistically significant differences in clinical status or laboratory values between the two groups but there were significant improvements in measured lab values between days 7 and 14 (p<0.005) indicating improved nutritional status in each groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that both TPN and PPN can be used safely in chronic ICU patients to provide nutritional support and prevent catabolic state among chronic critically ill patients. We need to develop precise selection criteria in order to choose the patients who would benefit the most from TPN and PPN. In addition, appropriate laboratory markers are needed to monitor the metabolic requirements of the patients and assess their progress.

Effects of propofol versus isoflurane on liver function after open thoracotomy.

BACKGROUND: Anesthetic agents and type of surgery may contribute to postoperative hepatic injury. Inhalational anesthetics have been associated with hepatic dysfunction after surgery, however, propofol is expected to have a lower potential for postoperative liver injury. This prospective double-blind randomized clinical study was planned to determine whether postoperative liver function differs after anesthesia with isoflurane and total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in patients undergoing a posterolateral thoracotomy. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2, aged 16-60 years, and scheduled for an elective posterolateral thoracotomy, were randomly assigned to an anesthetic protocol: propofol (n = 44) or isoflurane (n = 44). Induction of anesthesia was similar in both groups. Serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, and γ-glutamyltransferase were measured before induction of anesthesia and on the first and third days after either propofol or isoflurane anesthesia. RESULTS: Mild changes in postoperative serum levels of liver enzymes were significant within each group but the differences between groups were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol and isoflurane anesthesia have a comparable minor effect on liver function after an elective posterolateral thoracotomy.

Heart-lung transplantation in Iran: a case report.

We report our initial experience with a heart-lung transplant operation performed on a 12- year- old girl with Eisenmenger syndrome at Masih Daneshvari Teaching Hospital in Tehran, in 2009. We also outline the operative indications, anesthetic management, and postoperative complications of heart-lung transplantation. We hope that this issue on transplantation may provide an encouraging prospect for patients with end-stage cardiopulmonary disorders in Iran.

Effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate and lidocaine on hemodynamic variables following direct laryngoscopy and intubation in elective surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Laryngoscopy and intubation incur hemodynamic changes like increase in heart rate, arterial blood pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, wedge capillary pressure and arrhythmias. Anesthesiologists are continually in search of ways to alleviate such complications. Several medicinal methods have been suggested that serve the purpose including the administration of intravenous magnesium sulfate to minimize these unfavorable responses. This study compares the effects of intravenous administration of lidocaine and magnesium sulfate on unwanted hemodynamic responses following laryngoscopy and intubation in elective surgery candidates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 60 ASA-I and ASA-II candidates who received 60 mg/kg (based on Lean Body Mass) magnesium sulfate or lidocaine randomly before intubation. Values of systolic and diastolic blood pressures, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate were recorded for both groups during the 5 minutes following administration, and compared with baseline values. RESULTS: In both groups, systolic blood pressure increased compared to the baseline value. However, there was a significant difference between the two groups as this increase occurred within the first 3 minutes in the lidocaine group, while within the first minute in the magnesium sulfate group. The increase in diastolic blood pressure was not significant. But there was a significant difference in the mean arterial pressure increase between the two groups since in the magnesium sulfate group this increase occurred in the first minute whereas in the lidocaine group it occurred during the first two minutes. There was no significant difference in the heart rates after intubation between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Magnesium sulfate is more effective than lidocaine in controlling hemodynamics, although it may increase the heart rate.

Acute respiratory failure as a rare complication of celiac plexus block in a patient with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of vater.

Celiac and splanchnic plexus blocks are considered as terminal approaches for pain control in end stage pancreatic cancer. It may be done temporarily (using local anesthetics) or as a permanent act (using alcohol and/or phenol). Like every other interventional procedure, celiac plexus block has its own potential complications and hazards among them pneumothorax and ARDS are very rare. In this case report we present an end stage patient with adenocarcinoma of ampulla of Vater with involvement of both abdomen and thorax who presented with severe intractable abdominal pain. Bilateral celiac plexus block in this patient resulted in left side pneumothorax and subsequent development of ARDS. We discuss the rare complications of celiac plexus block as well.

The efficacy of a single dose of pethidine, fentanyl and morphine in treating postanesthesia shivering.

Postanesthesia shivering is an undesirable event that may induce a variety of adverse consequences including patient discomfort, increased oxygen consumption and wound pain. Thus, its pharmacological treatment should be regarded. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of morphine, fentanyl and pethidine for the treatment of postanesthesia shivering. Fifty patients who developed shivering were treated in a randomized double blinded manner with an intravenous bolus dose of 2 or 4 mg morphine, 25 or 50 mg pethidine, and 50 µg fentanyl. Then, they were monitored for 30 minutes and the shivering suppression grade, the time taken to stop shivering, the shivering cessation time, recurrence of shivering and opioid side effects were evaluated. Core body temperature was measured immediately before, and at 15 and 30 minute after administering the drug. The groups did not differ significantly regarding shivering suppression grade, shivering cessation time, and recurrence of shivering. There was a significant difference in the time taken to stop shivering between groups. Following injection of the drugs, the core temperatures increased in the five groups with statistical difference. All opioids were effective in treating postanesthesia shivering in a similar extent.

Prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy and postoperative visual loss.

PURPOSE: To study the simultaneous effects of prone position and anesthesia on intraocular pressure (IOP) and the time impact on post anesthesia visual loss development in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who were candidates for PCNL were recruited in this study. Intraocular pressure was measured in five occasions: 1. Base line; 2. Ten minutes after anesthesia (Supine-I); 3. Ten minutes after position change to prone (Prone-I); 4. At the end of the operation (Prone-II); and 5. Ten minutes after position change to supine (Supine-II). The data were analyzed by SPSS software using repeated measures ANOVA and paired t test. RESULTS: The participants consisted of 17 (85%) men and 3 (15%) women, with the mean age of 44 years. The duration of the prone position was 79.75 ± 22.73 minutes. Intraocular pressure changed significantly in five positions (P = .000). It was lower in supine-I than baseline, higher in prone-I than base line and supine-I, lower in supine-II than prone-II, and highest in prone-II (P = .000). There was a linear relationship between IOP and prone position duration (r = 0.67; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Intraocular pressure dropped significantly after anesthesia and increased in prone position. There was a linear relationship between IOP rise and the prone position duration, doubled within two hours. Therefore, in PCNL carried out in prone position, it is recommended to observe safety measures and necessary precautions for IOP rise and possible post anesthesia visual loss, particularly in glaucoma.

Interpleural morphine vs bupivacaine for postthoracotomy pain relief.

This prospective randomized double-blind trial was designed to compare the analgesic effects of interpleural bupivacaine and interpleural morphine for postthoracotomy pain management. Thirty-six American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II patients undergoing an elective posterolateral thoracotomy were randomly divided into 2 groups of 18 each. Before chest closure, an interpleural catheter was inserted under direct vision. At the end of the operation and every 4 hours thereafter, they received either 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine or 0.2 mg x kg(-1) morphine sulfate interpleurally for 24 hours. The chest tubes were clamped during injection and for 15 min afterwards. Supplementary doses of intravenous morphine were given on request. The pain severity was evaluated at rest and on coughing before and 30 min after each interpleural injection, using an 11-point visual analog scale. Supplemental analgesic consumption and side effects were recorded. Both interpleural morphine and bupivacaine significantly reduced pain scores 30 min after each injection. However, pain scores and supplementary analgesic requirements were significantly lower in the interpleural morphine group. No serious side effects were detected in either group. Interpleural morphine provides better pain control than interpleural bupivacaine after a posterolateral thoracotomy.

The anesthetic management of an intrabronchial escape of a hydatid's ruptured laminated membrane during rigid bronchoscopy.

We describe the anesthetic management of a case in whom a previously undiagnosed pulmonary hydatid cyst manifested as a large amount of intrabronchial fragmented pieces of laminated membrane suddenly and unexpectedly during diagnostic rigid bronchoscopy.