Impaired motility in Barrett's esophagus: A study using high-resolution manometry with physiologic challenge.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal dysmotility may predispose to Barrett's esophagus (BE). We hypothesized that high-resolution manometry (HRM) performed with additional physiologic challenge would better delineate dysmotility in BE. METHODS: Included patients had typical reflux symptoms and underwent endoscopy, HRM with single water swallows and adjunctive testing with solids and rapid drink challenge (RDC) before ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring. BE and endoscopy-negative reflux disease (ENRD) subjects were compared against functional heartburn patient-controls (FHC). Primary outcome was incidence of HRM contractile abnormalities with standard and adjunctive swallows. Secondary outcomes included clearance measures and symptom association on pH-impedance. KEY RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (BE 25, ENRD 27, FHC 26) were included. Water swallow contractility was reduced in both BE (median DCI 87 mm Hg/cm/s) and ENRD (442 mm Hg/cm/s) compared to FHC (602 mm Hg/cm/s; P < .001 and .04, respectively). With the challenge of solid swallows and RDC, these parameters improved in ENRD (solids = 1732 mm Hg/cm/s), becoming similar to FHC (1242 mm Hg/cm/s; P = .93), whereas abnormalities persisted in BE (818 mm Hg/cm/s; P < .01 c.f. FHC). In BE and ENRD, reflux events (67 vs 57 events/24 hour) and symptom frequency were similar; yet symptom correlation was significantly better in ENRD compared to BE, which was comparable to FHC (symptom index 30% vs 4% vs 0%, respectively). Furthermore, bolus clearance and exposure times were more pronounced in BE (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Reduced contractile effectiveness persisted in BE with the more representative esophageal challenge of swallowing solids and free drinking; while in ENRD and FHC peristalsis usually improved, demonstrating peristaltic reserve. Furthermore, symptom association and refluxate clearance were reduced in BE. These factors may underlie BE pathogenesis.

Effectiveness of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in managing refractory constipation.

AIM: Chronic constipation can be aetiopathogenically classified into slow transit constipation (STC), rectal evacuation difficulty (RED) or a combination (BOTH). Although the efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in faecal incontinence has been well proved, a current literature search identifies only one study which assessed its effect on constipation. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PTNS in patients with different causes of constipation. METHOD: Thirty-four patients [30 women, median age 50 (20-79) years] with constipation who had previously failed maximal laxative and biofeedback therapy participated in the study. All patients underwent a baseline radio-opaque marker transit study and anorectal physiology examination. All had 12 sessions of PTNS of 30 min per session. A fall in the Wexner constipation score to ≤15 or by ≥5 points was taken as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the results of pre- and post- PTNS transit and anorectal physiology studies. RESULTS: Eleven patients had STC, 14 had RED and nine had BOTH. A response was seen in four patients (1/11 STC, 2/14 RED and 1/9 BOTH). Comparing pre- and post- PTNS, there was no significant change in the mean Wexner score (P = 0.10). There was no change in colonic transit time among the whole population (P = 0.56) or among those with STC (P = 0.47). There was no improvement in balloon expulsion in the whole group (P = 0.73) or in patients with RED (P = 0.69). CONCLUSION: PTNS is of no benefit to patients with constipation, whatever aetiopathogenic mechanism is responsible for the symptoms.

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of cephradine and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute dysuria and/or frequency in general practice.

One hundred and thirteen patients with dysuria and/or frequency were treated randomly with either 500 mg cephradine 12-hourly or 125 mg cefuroxime axetil 12-hourly, for seven days. A total of 71 patients were found to have urinary infection: bacteriological cure rates were 97% one week post-treatment, and 96% five weeks post-treatment, for both antibiotics. On direct questioning, adverse events were reported by eight patients out of 59 taking cephradine and by three of 54 who had received cefuroxime axetil. However, only three and one respectively stopped taking the antibiotic due to the adverse event. Analysis of diary cards, completed by 109 patients, showed a significantly higher incidence of increased frequency of bowel movements in those taking cefuroxime axetil. It is concluded that both antibiotics are of equal value in the treatment of simple acute urinary infections in general practice.

Relationship of urinary pH to symptoms of 'cystitis'.

The pH of urine samples from patients suffering symptoms suggesting urinary infection (e.g. dysuria, frequency, urgency) was measured while the patients were symptomatic and again when they had become asymptomatic. There was no correlation between the urine pH and the incidence or number of symptoms. No differences were observed between either the distribution or means of urine pH values in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. There were also no significant differences in either symptomatology or urine pH between patients with significant bacteriuria and those without significant bacteriuria. These results cast doubt upon the traditional (but unproved) belief that alkalinizing the urine helps to reduce symptoms of dysuria and/or frequency, whether or not associated with urinary infection.

Single dose and conventional treatment for acute bacterial and non-bacterial dysuria and frequency in general practice.

A five day course of clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin (Augmentin) has been compared with a single oral dose of fosfomycin trometamol in the treatment of patients complaining of symptoms suggesting urinary tract infection. The study took place in a single urban general practice of 15,000 patients in Cheshire. The microbiology was performed at a London Teaching Hospital. 141 patients entered the trial. 65 had a significant bacteriuria, 62 of which were assessable for the ability of the trial drugs to eradicate bacteriuria: 29 patients received clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin and 33 fosfomycin trometamol. The cure rates, assessed at five to ten days and at four to six weeks post treatment, were 72% and 65%, respectively for clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin and 85% and 81%, respectively for fosfomycin trometamol. Side effects, assessed in all 141 patients, occurred in 11.6% receiving clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin and in 8.3% receiving fosfomycin. Statistically there is no difference between any of these findings and the effect of sample size is discussed. 69 patients were symptomatic but did not have a significant bacteriuria ("urethral syndrome"). These patients were assessed for the effect of treatment in relieving symptoms: 33 received fosfomycin trometamol and 36 clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin. The success and speed of relieving the symptoms were very similar in the two groups. The finding that both groups responded equally well appears to refute an aetiological role for lactobacilli and diphtheroids in the "urethral syndrome", since these organisms are resistant to fosfomycin but sensitive to clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin.

General practitioner study: fosfomycin trometamol versus amoxycillin clavulanate in acute urinary tract infections.

A clinical trial comparing 5 days' treatment with amoxycillin/clavulanate (group A) and a single dose of fosfomycin trometamol (group B) is presented. The study was done in symptomatic patients presenting to their family practitioner, with the microbiological testing being carried out in a university hospital laboratory. Of 62 patients with significant bacteriuria, 29 were given amoxycillin/clavulanate and 33 fosfomycin trometamol, in a randomized fashion. Cure rates 1 week and 5 weeks after the end of treatment were 72 and 65% in group A and 85 and 81% in group B. Adverse events assessed in 141 patients were unusual (10.1% in group A and 8.3% in group B) and were mild in nature. The results of this study suggest that single-dose treatment with fosfomycin trometamol is effective and acceptable as a conventional course of amoxycillin clavulanate for the treatment of simple acute dysuria and/or frequency with infection.