Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences in Young Adults and Adults: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Investigations have shown the different impacts that ACEs have on an individual's adult life, on both physical and mental health, but they have not yet shown the issue of the influence of ACEs on adults and young adults. Objective/Participants and Setting: This systematic review, performed according to the PRISMA norms and guidelines, intended to understand the most frequent outcomes of adverse childhood experiences in the life of young adults and adults. METHODS: Studies were identified through multiple literature search databases at EBSCOhost, Web of Science, and PubMed April 2023, and a total of 279 studies, published between 1999 and 2002, were excluded, 256 because of multiple factors: being duplicates, showing statistical analysis with correlations only, being systematic reviews or case studies, comprising individuals under the age of 18, and not meeting the intended theme; ultimately, we selected for the review a total of 23 studies. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The impacts of the various articles are subdivided into three main themes: antisocial and criminal behaviour; sexual Behaviour and intimate partner violence; and attachment, quality of life, and therapeutic alliance.

The combined effect of BMI and age on ART outcomes.

STUDY QUESTION: For a woman with infertility and overweight/obesity, can infertility treatment be postponed to first promote weight loss? SUMMARY ANSWER: Advice regarding a delay in IVF treatment to optimize female weight should consider female age, particularly in women over 38 years for whom only substantial weight loss in a short period of time (3 months) seems to provide any benefit. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Body weight excess and advanced age are both common findings in infertile patients, creating the dilemma of whether to promote weight loss first or proceed to fertility treatment immediately. Despite their known impact on fertility, studies assessing the combined effect of female age and BMI on cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) are still scarce and conflicting. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study including 14 213 patients undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle with autologous oocytes and subsequent embryo transfers, between January 2013 and February 2018 in 18 centres of a multinational private fertility clinic. BMI was subdivided into the following subgroups: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and obesity (≥30.0 kg/m2). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The primary outcome was CLBR. The secondary outcome was time to pregnancy. To assess the influence of female age and BMI on CLBR, two multivariable regression models were developed with BMI being added in the models as either an ordinal categorical variable (Model 1) or a continuous variable (Model 2) using the best-fitting fractional polynomials. CLBR was estimated over 1-year periods (Model 1) and shorter timeframes of 3 months (Model 2). We then compared the predicted CLBRs according to BMI and age. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: When compared to normal weight, CLBRs were lower in women who were overweight (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.96) and obese (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.87). A reduction of BMI within 1 year, from obesity to overweight or overweight to normal weight would be potentially beneficial up to 35 years old, while only a substantial reduction (i.e. from obesity to normal BMI) would be potentially beneficial in women aged 36-38 years. Above 38 years of age, even considerable weight loss did not compensate for the effect of age over a 1-year span but may be beneficial in shorter time frames. In a timeframe of 3 months, there is a potential benefit in CLBR if there is a loss of 1 kg/m2 in BMI for women up to 33.25 years and 2 kg/m2 in women aged 33.50-35.50 years. Older women would require more challenging weight loss to achieve clinical benefit, specifically 3 kg/m2 in women aged 35.75-37.25 years old, 4 kg/m2 in women aged 37.50-39.00 years old, and 5 kg/m2 or more in women over 39.25 years old. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is limited by its retrospective design and lower number of women in the extreme BMI categories. The actual effect of individual weight loss on patient outcomes was also not evaluated, as this was a retrospective interpatient comparison to estimate the combined effect of weight loss and ageing in a fixed period on CLBR. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings suggest that there is potential benefit in weight loss strategies within 1 year prior to ART, particularly in women under 35 years with BMI ≥25 kg/m2. For those over 35 years of age, weight loss should be considerable or occur in a shorter timeframe to avoid the negative effect of advancing female age on CLBR. A tailored approach for weight loss, according to age, might be the best course of action. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was obtained for this study. All authors have no conflicts to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Perinatal outcomes in children born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer using donated oocytes.

STUDY QUESTION: Do children born after vitrified-thawed embryo transfers (ETs) using donated oocytes have worse perinatal outcomes when compared with fresh ET? SUMMARY ANSWER: No significant difference in birthweight and prematurity rates between fresh or frozen embryo transfers (FETs) in newborns after oocyte donation was found. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Autologous singletons born after fresh ET have been previously associated with higher rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, while FETs seem to confer a higher risk of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and macrosomia. However, studies comparing these outcomes using autologous oocytes are unable to adequately disentangle the putative detrimental consequences of embryo vitrification from the possible effects that ovarian stimulation and endometrial preparation may have on endometrial receptivity prior to ET. The oocyte donation model is, for this reason, a more appropriate setting to study these hypotheses; however so far, the information available regarding neonatal outcomes in this patient population is limited to either small and/or heterogeneous studies. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study including 5848 singletons born between 2009 and February 2020 following oocyte donation and single blastocyst transfer, subdivided according to whether a fresh ET or FET was performed. We also performed two additional sensitivity analyses, subgrouping the sample according to the type of endometrial preparation (natural versus artificial) and whether the donated oocytes had previously been vitrified or not. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients with a first singleton livebirth after single blastocyst transfer were compared using multivariable regression analysis to account for potential confounding factors. The primary outcome was birthweight. Secondary outcomes were birthweight z-scores and percentiles, small/large for gestational age, gestational age at delivery, gender, prematurity (<37 weeks and <32 weeks), neonatal morbidity (Apgar scores and need for neonatal intensive care) and maternal morbidity (gestational hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes and caesarean delivery). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was no significant difference between the fresh ET and FET groups in terms of mean birthweight (3215 g versus 3200 g) and birthweight z-scores (0.03 versus 0.1), in both the unadjusted and confounder-adjusted models. However, artificial endometrial preparation was associated with a higher birthweight (3220 g versus 3105 g) and birthweight z-scores (0.06 versus -0.13) when compared with a transfer in a natural cycle. Although a 1-day statistically significant difference in gestational age at birth (275 versus 274 days) was detected, premature birth rates (<37 weeks) did not vary significantly between groups (9.9% and 11.2% for fresh ET and FET, respectively). No other statistically significant differences were found in the remaining neonatal and maternal outcomes studies between the fresh ET and FET groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is limited by its retrospective design and lack of information regarding congenital malformations. Moreover, the sample selection criteria that were used may limit the generalizability of our results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Perinatal outcomes did not seem to be affected significantly by the embryo vitrification process in an oocyte donation model. Hence, other factors may contribute to the hindered perinatal outcomes described in ART, particularly the potential effect that ovarian stimulation and endometrial preparation may have on endometrial receptivity. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was obtained for this study. All authors have no conflicts to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.