Treatment Response and Clinical Outcomes of Well-Differentiated High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors to Lutetium-177-DOTATATE.

INTRODUCTION: Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-DOTATATE received FDA approval in 2018 to treat somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Little data are available on response and outcomes for well-differentiated (WD) high-grade (HG) NETs treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with WD HG NETs treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE at MSK from 2018 to 2020 were identified. Demographics, response (RECIST 1.1), and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in the archival tumor. RESULTS: Nineteen patients, all with progressive, heavily treated disease, were identified. Sites of tumor origin were: pancreas (74%), small bowel (11%), rectum (11%), and lung (5%); median Ki-67 was 32% (range 22-56). Thirteen patients (68%) completed all four 177Lu-DOTATATE cycles. Best response (N = 18 evaluable) was: 5/18 (28%) partial response, 8/18 (44%) stable disease, and 5/18 (28%) disease progression. Median PFS was 13.1 months (95% CI: 8.7-20.9). Most common treatment-related toxicities were thrombocytopenia (9 patients, 47%; G3/4, 1 patient, 5%), anemia (7 patients, 37%; G3/4, 2 patients, 11%), leukopenia (6 patients, 32%; G3/4, 0 patients), and liver function test elevation (4 patients, 21%; G3/4, 0 patients). NGS results were available from 13/19 tumors (68%). The most observed alterations were in MEN1 (6/13, 46%) and DAXX (4/13, 31%). No RB1 alterations identified. CONCLUSION: We observed a meaningful disease control rate of 72% during treatment of WD HG NETs with 177Lu-DOTATATE. In this heavily pre-treated population, more than half of patients received all four treatment cycles with toxicities largely bone marrow-related. As would be expected in WD NETs, the vast majority had alterations in chromatin remodeling genes and no RB1 alterations.

Next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid for clinical molecular diagnostics in pediatric, adolescent and young adult brain tumor patients.

BACKGROUND: Safe sampling of central nervous system tumor tissue for diagnostic purposes may be difficult if not impossible, especially in pediatric patients, and an unmet need exists to develop less invasive diagnostic tests. METHODS: We report our clinical experience with minimally invasive molecular diagnostics using a clinically validated assay for sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell-free DNA (cfDNA). All CSF samples were collected as part of clinical care, and results reported to both clinicians and patients/families. RESULTS: We analyzed 64 CSF samples from 45 pediatric, adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients (pediatric = 25; AYA = 20) with primary and recurrent brain tumors across 12 histopathological subtypes including high-grade glioma (n = 10), medulloblastoma (n = 10), pineoblastoma (n = 5), low-grade glioma (n = 4), diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor (DLGNT) (n = 4), retinoblastoma (n = 4), ependymoma (n = 3), and other (n = 5). Somatic alterations were detected in 30/64 samples (46.9%) and in at least one sample per unique patient in 21/45 patients (46.6%). CSF cfDNA positivity was strongly associated with the presence of disseminated disease at the time of collection (81.5% of samples from patients with disseminated disease were positive). No association was seen between CSF cfDNA positivity and the timing of CSF collection during the patient's disease course. CONCLUSIONS: We identified three general categories where CSF cfDNA testing provided additional relevant diagnostic, prognostic, and/or therapeutic information, impacting clinical assessment and decision making: (1) diagnosis and/or identification of actionable alterations; (2) monitor response to therapy; and (3) tracking tumor evolution. Our findings support broader implementation of clinical CSF cfDNA testing in this population to improve care.

Ribociclib and everolimus in well-differentiated foregut neuroendocrine tumors.

The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus is an established therapy for well-differentiated (WD) foregut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Pre-clinical data demonstrates a potential synergistic role for cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition and everolimus to treat this disease. In this phase II multicenter study, patients with advanced foregut WDNETs received combination ribociclib and everolimus until confirmed disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The first 12 patients received ribociclib 300 mg three weeks in a row with a 1 week break and everolimus 2.5 mg daily (recommended phase II dose). Due to unexpected hematologic and infectious toxicities, the trial was put on hold, modified, and an additional 9 patients received ribociclib 200 mg and everolimus 2.5 mg daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Archived pre-treatment tumor was profiled by next-generation sequencing to evaluate for genomic markers of drug response. Twenty-one patients were treated (median age, 56; range, 24 to 77). The study did not meet the pre-specified criteria to advance to stage two. No patients experienced an objective response. Thirteen patients (62%) experienced stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 2.8 months to not reached). Eleven of the first 12 patients (92%) developed grade 2 or more myelosuppression. Ten patients (84%) experienced treatment interruption and 8 patients (67%) required dose reduction. Genetic testing in archival tumor tissue samples failed to identify a predictive biomarker of disease stabilization. The combination of ribociclib and everolimus had insufficient activity to warrant further investigation in foregut WDNETs.