Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet Haematol ; 11(5): e345-e357, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38554715

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although nitric oxide based therapeutics have been shown in preclinical models to reduce vaso-occlusive events and improve cardiovascular function, a clinical trial of a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor increased rates of admission to hospital for pain. We aimed to examine if riociguat, a direct stimulator of the nitric oxide receptor soluble guanylate cyclase, causes similar increases in vaso-occlusive events. METHODS: This was a phase 1-2, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had confirmed sickle cell disease documented by haemoglobin electrophoresis or HPLC fractionation (haemoglobin SS, SC, Sß-thalassemia, SD, or SO-Arab), and stage 1 hypertension or proteinuria. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either riociguat or matching placebo via a web-based system to maintain allocation concealment. Both treatments were administered orally starting at 1·0 mg three times a day up to 2·5 mg three times a day (highest tolerated dose) for 12 weeks. Dose escalation by 0·5 mg was considered every 2 weeks if systolic blood pressure was greater than 95 mm Hg and the participant had no signs of hypotension; otherwise, the last dose was maintained. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who had at least one adjudicated treatment-emergent serious adverse event. The analysis was performed by the intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02633397) and was completed. FINDINGS: Between April 11, 2017, and Dec 31, 2021, 165 participants were screened and consented to be enrolled into the study. Of these, 130 participants were randomly assigned to either riociguat (n=66) or placebo (n=64). The proportion of participants with at least one treatment-emergent serious adverse event was 22·7% (n=15) in the riociguat group and 31·3% (n=20) in the placebo group (difference -8·5% [90% CI -21·4 to 4·5]; p=0·19). A similar pattern emerged in other key safety outcomes, sickle cell related vaso-occlusive events (16·7 [n=11] vs 21·9% [n=14]; difference -5·2% [-17·2 to 6·5]; p=0·42), mean pain severity (3·18 vs 3·32; adjusted mean difference -0·14 [-0·70 to 0·42]; p=0·69), and pain interference (3·15 vs 3·12; 0·04 [-0·62 to 0·69]; p=0·93) at 12 weeks were similar between groups. Regarding the key clinical efficacy endpoints, participants taking riociguat had a blood pressure of -8·20 mm Hg (-10·48 to -5·91) compared with -1·24 (-3·58 to 1·10) in those taking placebo (-6·96 mm Hg (90% CI -10·22 to -3·69; p<0·001). INTERPRETATION: Riociguat was safe and had a significant haemodynamic effect on systemic blood pressure. The results of this study provide measures of effect and variability that will inform power calculations for future trials. FUNDING: Bayer Pharmaceuticals.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme , Hipertensão , Proteinúria , Pirazóis , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Anemia Falciforme/tratamento farmacológico , Anemia Falciforme/complicações , Masculino , Feminino , Método Duplo-Cego , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Proteinúria/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Mol Liq ; 382: 121904, 2023 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37151376

RESUMO

In the current study, a hybrid computational approach consisting of different computational methods to explore the molecular electronic structures, bioactivity and therapeutic potential of piperidine compounds against SARS-CoV-2. The quantum chemical methods are used to study electronic structures of designed derivatives, molecular docking methods are used to see the most potential docking interactions for main protease (MPro) of SARS-CoV-2 while molecular dynamic and MMPBSA analyses are performed in bulk water solvation process to mimic real protein like aqueous environment and effectiveness of docked complexes. We designed and optimized piperidine derivatives from experimentally known precursor using quantum chemical methods. The UV-Visible, IR, molecular orbitals, molecular electrostatic plots, and global chemical reactivity descriptors are carried out which illustrate that the designed compounds are kinetically stable and reactive. The results of MD simulations and binding free energy revealed that all the complex systems possess adequate dynamic stability, and flexibility based on their RMSD, RMSF, radius of gyration, and hydrogen bond analysis. The computed net binding free energy ( Δ G b i n d ) as calculated by MMPBSA method for the complexes showed the values of -4.29 kcal.mol-1 for P1, -5.52 kcal.mol-1 for P2, -6.12 kcal.mol-1 for P3, -6.35 kcal.mol-1 for P4, -5.19 kcal.mol-1 for P5, 3.09 kcal.mol-1 for P6, -6.78 kcal.mol-1 for P7, and -6.29 kcal.mol-1 for P8.The ADMET analysis further confirmed that none of among the designed ligands violates the Lipinski rule of five (RO5). The current comprehensive investigation predicts that all our designed compounds are recommended as prospective therapeutic drugs against Mpro of SARS-CoV-2 and it provokes the scientific community to further perform their in-vitro analysis.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...