RESUMO
Background and Objectives: Extra-intestinal salmonellosis is associated with higher case fatality and is underestimated in the developing countries like India. Here we present a case series of bacteriologically proven extra-intestinal salmonellosis managed at our institute over the past two years. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of bacteriologically proven extra-intestinal salmonellosis over two years between January 2020 to December 2021 was carried out. Medical records were reviewed for site of infection, evidence of any underlying or predisposing illnesses and antimicrobial susceptibility report. Results: Eight patients were diagnosed with extra-intestinal salmonellosis. Male to female ratio was 3:1. Mean age was 44 years. Four were typhoidal and four were nontyphoidal Salmonellae. The extra-intestinal sites involved were purulent aspirates from scrotum, caecum, perianal region, intraperitoneal collection, synovium, and urine. Predisposing factors include chronic myeloid leukemia, HIV and gastric malignancy. All deep seated abscess required surgical intervention. All typhoidal Salmonella (n=4) were sensitive to cotrimoxazole, ampicillin, ceftriaxone. Among nontyphoidal Salmonella, one was resistant to cotrimoxazole; two were resistant to ampicillin, ceftriaxone and three resistant to ciprofloxacin. Conclusion: The diagnosis of extra-intestinal salmonellosis requires a high degree of clinical suspicion and should be included in the differential diagnosis in patients with deep-seated abscesses.
RESUMO
Background Over the years, there has been an increase in hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) among patients in India. One of the main reasons is a lack of compliance with infection control guidelines, such as hand hygiene. So the present study was conducted to determine the compliance of hand hygiene among healthcare workers in a private tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. Materials and methods The prospective observational study was carried out between April 2017 and March 2020. Nineteen areas were directly observed for hand hygiene (HH) compliance. At each location, HH audit was conducted for one hour per day for five days per month. HH complete adherence rate (HHCAR) and HH partial adherence rate (HHPAR) were analyzed. Results Nine hundred and twenty observation periods were completed during the entire study period. Overall, hand hygiene complete adherence rate was 29.9% (11,981/39,998); partial adherence rate was 45.3% (18,131/39,998) and the non-adherence rate was 24.7% (9886/39,998). A better adherence rate was seen among nurses (44.7%), followed by other staff (33.7%) and doctors (33.04%). Moment-specific adherence rates show almost equal adherence rates of 50.7%, 50.75%, and 50.1%, respectively, for moments 2, 3, and 4, and comparatively low for moments 1 and 5 (48.4% and 47.6%, respectively). Conclusion Despite adequate hand hygiene facilities, compliance remains low. Hand hygiene is a bundle care approach that needs to consider factors including healthcare staff, clinical, institutional, environmental, and behavioral changes. Multimodal interventions and multidisciplinary commitment are mandatory for sustained compliance.
