Autonomous diagnosis of pediatric cutaneous vascular anomalies using a convolutional neural network.

OBJECTIVES: Design and validate a novel handheld device for the autonomous diagnosis of pediatric vascular anomalies using a convolutional neural network (CNN). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study of medical images. Computer aided design and 3D printed manufacturing. METHODS: We obtained a series of head and neck vascular anomaly images in pediatric patients from the database maintained in a large multidisciplinary vascular anomalies clinic. The database was supplemented with additional images from the internet. Four diagnostic classes were recognized in the dataset - infantile hemangioma, capillary malformation, venous malformation, and arterio-venous malformation. Our group designed and implemented a convolutional neural network to recognize the four classes of vascular anomalies as well as a fifth class consisting of none of the vascular anomalies. The system was based on the Inception-Resnet neural network using transfer learning. For deployment, we designed and built a compact, handheld device including a central processing unit, display subsystems, and control electronics. The device focuses upon and autonomously classifies pediatric vascular lesions. RESULTS: The multiclass system distinguished the diagnostic categories with an overall accuracy of 84%. The inclusion of lesion metadata improved overall accuracy to 94%. Sensitivity ranged from 88% (venous malformation) to 100% (arterio-venous malformation and capillary malformation). CONCLUSIONS: An easily deployed handheld device to autonomously diagnose pediatric skin lesions is feasible. Large training datasets and novel neural network architectures will be required for successful implementation.

Open Periprosthetic Knee Fracture: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Introduction: With the increase in knee and hip implants, these periprosthetic fractures will become more common especially as the population ages. Open periprosthetic fractures are rare and severe injuries and are more likely to be seen in high-energy injuries. They present challenges to the treating physician due to soft tissue damage, contamination of the existing implants, and the effects of polytrauma in the geriatric patient. Methods Case review report and review of literature Results: A 72-year-old woman was involved in a motor vehicle collision with multiple injuries including an open periprosthetic tibia and femur fracture. This was treated with initial washout and removal of loose tibial component with placement of a cement spacer. The knee was treated with staged revision using a protocol like that used after prosthetic joint infection. After complete soft tissue healing, the patient underwent successful revision with a megaprosthesis. The literature on open periprosthetic fractures is reviewed. Discussion and Conclusion: Open periprosthetic fractures present multiple challenges to the orthopedic surgeon. In the presences of poly trauma and soft tissue injury, we present an approach using staged surgery like that used for prosthetic joint infection.

Demographics, Treatment, and Cost of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: Fixation Versus Revision.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFX) are complications of both total hip and knee arthroplasty and may be treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or revision arthroplasty. Differences in treatment and fracture location may be related to patient demographics and lead to differences in cost. Our study examined the effects of demographics and treatment of knee and hip PPFXs on length of stay (LOS) and cost. METHODS: Of all, 932 patients were identified with hip or knee PPFXs in the National Inpatient Sample from January 2013 to September 2015. Age, gender, race, mortality, comorbidity level, LOS, total cost, procedure type, geographic region, and hospital type were recorded. A generalized linear regression model was conducted to analyze the effect of fracture type on LOS and cost. RESULTS: Differences in gender (66% vs 83.7% female, P < .01), comorbidities (fewer in hips, P < .01), and costs (US$30 979 vs US$27 944, P < .01) were found between the hip and knee groups. Knees had significantly higher rates of ORIF treatment (80.7% vs 39.1%) and lower rates of revision arthroplasties (19.3% vs 60.9%) than hip PPFXs (P < .01). Within both groups, patients with more comorbidities, revision surgery, and blood transfusions were more likely to have a longer LOS and higher cost. CONCLUSION: Periprosthetic femur fractures patients are not homogenous and treatment varies between hip and knee locations. For knee patients, those treated with ORIF were younger, with fewer comorbidities than those treated with revision. Conversely, hip patients treated with ORIF were older, with more comorbidities than those treated with revision. Hips had higher costs than knees, and cost correlated with revision arthroplasty and more comorbidities. In both hip and knee groups, longer LOS was associated with more comorbidities and being treated in urban teaching hospitals. Total cost had the strongest associations with revision procedures as well as number of comorbidities and blood product use.