Phase II study of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and cisplatin for operable and locally advanced breast cancer: analysis of 126 patients.

In an earlier study, we have demonstrated a high clinical and pathologic response rate of neoadjuvant paclitaxel (P) and cisplatin (C) for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). The current phase II study includes larger number of patients who had longer follow-up. A total of 126 consecutive patients with noninflammatory LABC (T2 >4 cm, T3 or T4, N0-N3, M0) were included in the study. Patients were scheduled to receive three to four cycles of the neoadjuvant PC (paclitaxel 135 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2) on day 1) every 21 days. Patients were then subjected to surgery and subsequently received six cycles of FAC (5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2), doxorubicin 50 mg m(-2), and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m(-2)) or four cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60 mg m(-2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2)); all drugs were administered intravenously on day 1 with cycles repeated every 21 days. Patients then received radiation therapy, and those with hormone receptor-positive tumours were given adjuvant tamoxifen intended for 5 years. The median age was 41 years. Clinically, 12, 52, and 37% of patients had T2 >4 cm, T3, and T4, respectively. The mean tumour size was 7 cm (95% CI, 7.3-8.5). The clinical nodal status was N0, N1, and N2-N3 in 32, 52, and 17% of patients, respectively. Disease stage at diagnosis was IIA (2%), IIB (32%), IIIA (28%), and IIIB (39%). Clinical assessment of the primary tumour and the axillary nodal status after primary chemotherapy showed that 35 patients (28%) achieved complete response (cCR), while 80 (63%) demonstrated partial response to PC. Of patients with evaluable pathologic data of the primary tumour (123 patients), complete pathologic response (pCR) was achieved in 29 patients (24%), and an additional nine (7%) only had a microinvasive disease. Moreover, 20 of the 122 patients (16%) had no residual disease in the primary tumour or in the axillary nodes. Failure to attain cCR predicted failure to achieve pCR. At a median follow-up of 37.5 months (95% CI, 31.5-43.3), 71% were alive with no recurrence, 16% were alive with evidence of disease, and 13% were dead. Of the 122 patients who had surgery, 36 (29%) developed recurrence including one of the patients who attained pCR. The median overall or disease-free survival has not been reached with a projected 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of 85% (+/-4%) and 63% (+/-5%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, clinical response of the primary tumour, pathological response of the primary tumour, and the pathological nodal status were identified as independent prognostic variables for DFS. No variable, however, was identified to prognosticate OS. PC was acceptably safe. Neoadjuvant PC as used in this phase II study in a multidisciplinary strategy was highly effective. Clinical and pathologic responses remain the most important variables that predict outcome.

High complete pathological response in locally advanced breast cancer using paclitaxel and cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: In an earlier study, we have demonstrated a high response rate in metastatic breast cancer using paclitaxel (P) and cisplatin (C). A phase II study using the same regimen (PC) has been conducted in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: A total of 72 consecutive patients with non-inflammatory LABC (T2 > or = 4 cm, T3 or T4, N0-N2, M0). Patients were scheduled to receive 3-4 cycles of the neoadjuvant PC (paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1) every 21 days. Patients were then subjected to surgery and subsequently received 6 cycles of FAC (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) or 4 cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2). Patients then received radiation therapy, and those with hormone receptor positive tumors were given adjuvant tamoxifen intended for 5 years. RESULTS: The median age was 39 years (range, 24-78). Clinically, 7%, 58%, and 35% of patients had T2 > or = 4 cm, T3, and T4, respectively. Disease stage at diagnosis was IIB (33%), IIIA (27%), and IIIB (40%). Complete and partial clinical response to PC was demonstrated in 13 (18%), and 52 (72%) patients, respectively. Of those patients with evaluable pathologic response (68 patients), complete pathologic response (pCR) was achieved in 15 (22%) patients. At a median follow-up of 22 (+/- 3.5) months, 58 (81%) were alive with no recurrence, nine (12%) were alive with evidence of disease, and five (7%) were dead. None of the patients achieving pCR has developed any relapse. The median overall survival has not been reached for all 72 patients with a projected 3-year survival (+/- SE) of 90% (+/- 4%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 42.1 (+/- 4.8) months with a projected PFS of 74% +/- 7% at 3-years (for 68 patients). CONCLUSIONS: PC regimen in LABC produced a high pCR. The contribution of the other added modalities to survival could not be assessed.

Primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: clinical features, management, and prognosis of 185 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (PG-NHL) is common in Saudi Arabia. This has prompted the analysis of a large series of patients with PG-NHL having high-grade diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL) in order to define the clinical features and outcome of this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of all adult patients in the series with PG-NHL having DLCL histology were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were eligible if they had biopsy-confirmed diagnoses obtained by endoscopy or following laparotomy. RESULTS: Over a 16-year period, 185 patients with DLCL PG-NHL were identified and their data were reviewed. Patients had a median age of 54 years. In 53% of them only one initial therapeutic modality was given, while 47% were managed by a multi-modality approach. One hundred forty patients (76%), 19 (10%), and 26 (14%) attained complete remission (CR), partial remission, and no response/progressive disease, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that poor performance status and advanced stage were negatively associated with the likelihood of attaining CR. Over a median follow-up of 54 months, 118 (64%) of the patients were alive and disease-free, 17 (9%) were alive with evidence of disease, and the remaining 50 (27%) were dead. The projected 5-year and 10-year overall survivals (OS) (+/- SD) were 68% (+/- 4%) and 61% (+/- 6%), respectively. The Cox proportional hazards model identified the same variables of response as adverse prognostic factors of survival. Using the influence of performance status, and stage, a prognostic index was constructed to recognize three prognostically distinctive risk categories with overall survival proportions of 87%, 61%, and 45%, respectively. The unadjusted International Prognostic Index, however, failed to classify patients into prognostically meaningful risk strata. Of the 140 patients who achieved CR, the median disease-free survival (DFS) was not reached, but the predicted 5- and 10-year DFS were 82% and 75%, respectively. A multivariate analysis identified poor performance status as the only independent prognostic covariate that adversely influenced DFS. Our analysis showed that compared with single-modality management, multi-modality strategy attained significantly higher CR, and advantageous OS and DFS. CONCLUSIONS: This large series characterized the clinico-pathologic features and outcome of patients with DLCL PG-NHL. Performance status, and stage significantly influenced patient outcome. A prognostic index was developed and it identified three prognostically distinctive risk groups; however, prospective validation is warranted.