RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Upadacitinib (UPA) is a Janus kinase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an acceptable safety profile. We investigated laboratory parameter changes in UPA RA clinical trials. METHODS: Pooled data from six randomized trials in the SELECT phase 3 program were included. Key laboratory parameters and safety data were measured for UPA 15 and 30 mg once daily (QD), adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg every other week + methotrexate (MTX), and MTX monotherapy. Exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs) of adverse events were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 3209 patients receiving UPA 15 mg QD (10 782.7 patient-years [PY]), 1204 patients receiving UPA 30 mg QD (3162.5 PY), 579 patients receiving ADA + MTX (1573.2 PY), and 314 patients receiving MTX monotherapy (865.1 PY) were included, representing up to 6.5 years of total exposure. Decreases in mean levels of hemoglobin, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, and increases in mean levels of liver enzymes and creatinine phosphokinase were observed with UPA, with grade 3 or 4 changes observed in some patients. Mean low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratios remained stable for patients receiving UPA 15 mg QD. EAERs of anemia and neutropenia occurred at generally consistent rates between UPA and active comparators (3.1-4.3 and 1.7-5.0 events [E]/100 PY across treatment groups, respectively). Rates of hepatic disorder were higher with MTX monotherapy, UPA 15 mg and UPA 30 mg (10.8, 9.7, and 11.0 E/100 PY, respectively) versus ADA + MTX (6.4 E/100 PY). Rates of lymphopenia were highest with MTX monotherapy (3.2 E/100 PY). Treatment discontinuations due to laboratory-related events were rare, occurring in 1.1% and 2.2% of patients treated with UPA 15 and 30 mg QD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this integrated long-term analysis of laboratory parameters continue to support an acceptable safety profile of UPA 15 mg QD for moderate-to-severe RA.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) often requires a combined medical/procedural approach. Biologics are frequently reserved for severe cases after irreversible tissue damage has occurred. We evaluated the association between consistent biologic use and the need for procedural interventions, systemic medications, and healthcare utilization. METHODS: UNITE, a 4-year, global, prospective, observational, HS disease registry, documented the natural history, diagnostic/treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of HS. Patients aged 12 years or more, with active HS were enrolled between October 2013 and December 2015 and evaluated every 6 months for 48 months at 73 sites across 12 countries (data cutoff December 2019). Proportions of patients requiring different HS procedures, systemic medications, and healthcare utilization were assessed during the 6-month periods before, during, and after biologic initiation for 12 weeks or more (i.e., consistent use). RESULTS: There were 63 instances of initiation of consistent biologic use (adalimumab [81%], infliximab [16%], and ustekinumab [3%]) in 57 patients. Patients' mean age was 40 years, 58% were female, and 53%/47% had Hurley stage II/III disease, respectively. Fewer patients required surgical/procedural interventions and systemic medications for the 6-month period during/6-month period after biologic initiation versus the 6-month period before biologic initiation, including intralesional corticosteroid injections (22%/14% vs 24%), incision and drainage (I&D) by physician (10%/10% vs 17%), I&D by patient (10%/10% vs 14%), surgical excision (8%/10% vs 11%), deroofing (5%/2% vs 5%), systemic antibiotics (43%/41% vs 54%), and systemic immunosuppressants (10%/6% vs 13%). Fewer patients required hospital admission for HS (17%/13% vs 21%) or emergency department visits for HS (8%/8% vs 16%) during the 6-month periods in which consistent biologics use started and continued versus the 6-month period before consistent biologic use. CONCLUSION: Following initiation of consistent biologic use (12 weeks or more), fewer patients required acute procedural interventions, systemic medications, and healthcare utilization, supporting the importance of early biologic initiation.
RESUMO
To our knowledge, the effect of plasmapheresis on the anti-factor Xa activity of enoxaparin has never been reported. We describe a 13-year-old, obese (92-kg) girl who was treated with enoxaparin for a pulmonary embolism while receiving plasmapheresis for suspected autoimmune encephalitis and who experienced clinically significant reductions in anti-factor Xa activity after plasmapheresis. She received five courses of plasmapheresis, with the final two administered during treatment with enoxaparin. Her anti-factor Xa concentrations were highly variable, and we hypothesized that plasmapheresis was affecting these levels. To test this hypothesis, anti-factor Xa concentrations were measured before and immediately after the patient's last plasmapheresis treatment, and then again 2 days after plasmapheresis. The rate of anti-factor Xa activity decline was 0.28 IU/mL/hour with plasmapheresis and only 0.088 IU/mL/hour on the day without plasmapheresis, representing a greater than 3-fold difference. The changes in anti-factor Xa activity due to plasmapheresis altered the final enoxaparin dosage required to remain in the therapeutic range of 0.5-1 IU/mL (0.98 mg/kg/dose while receiving plasmapheresis vs 0.69 mg/kg/dose without plasmapheresis). Our patient's data suggest that plasmapheresis can significantly alter enoxaparin's anticoagulant effect as measured by anti-factor Xa concentrations, which could cause a decreased anticoagulant effect during plasmapheresis and an increased risk of bleeding on plasmapheresis discontinuation. If concurrent enoxaparin-based anticoagulation and plasmapheresis are necessary, close monitoring of anti-factor Xa levels is advisable. Dose escalations and reductions of enoxaparin may be necessary when initiating and discontinuing plasmapheresis, respectively.
