Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Nurses Prof Dev ; 39(6): E180-E184, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37902639

RESUMO

The pandemic jolted our healthcare professionals like none other in modern history. Though it was a crisis of unparalleled proportion, it brought out the best in the nursing professional development unit of a minority nurses association. In this article, the authors describe the journey of a professional development unit that empowered nurses with "just-in-time" education for knowledge and competence to manage the pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Escolaridade , Pessoal de Saúde , Conhecimento , Pandemias
2.
Am J Crit Care ; 29(6): e116-e127, 2020 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32929453

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Critical care nurses caring for patients with a tracheostomy are at high risk because of the predilection of SARS-CoV-2 for respiratory and mucosal surfaces. This review identifies patient-centered practices that ensure safety and reduce risk of infection transmission to health care workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: Consensus statements, guidelines, institutional recommendations, and scientific literature on COVID-19 and previous outbreaks were reviewed. A global interdisciplinary team analyzed and prioritized findings via electronic communications and video conferences to develop consensus recommendations. RESULTS: Aerosol-generating procedures are commonly performed by nurses and other health care workers, most notably during suctioning, tracheostomy tube changes, and stoma care. Patient repositioning, readjusting circuits, administering nebulized medications, and patient transport also present risks. Standard personal protective equipment includes an N95/FFP3 mask with or without surgical masks, gloves, goggles, and gown when performing aerosol-generating procedures for patients with known or suspected COVID-19. Viral testing of bronchial aspirate via tracheostomy may inform care providers when determining the protective equipment required. The need for protocols to reduce risk of transmission of infection to nurses and other health care workers is evident. CONCLUSION: Critical care nurses and multidisciplinary teams often care for patients with a tracheostomy who are known or suspected to have COVID-19. Appropriate care of these patients relies on safeguarding the health care team. The practices described in this review may greatly reduce risk of infectious transmission.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Saúde Ocupacional , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Traqueostomia , Aerossóis , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/enfermagem , Enfermagem de Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Humanos , Pandemias , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Pneumonia Viral/enfermagem , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , SARS-CoV-2
4.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs ; 46(2): 98-105, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30844867

RESUMO

The purpose of this quality improvement project was to determine hospitalists' knowledge, practices, and perspectives related to management of pressure injuries and neuropathic/diabetic foot complications (having a foot ulcer or subsequent development of a foot infection because of a foot ulcer). We also sought to identify resources for and knowledge-based barriers to management of these wounds. This quality improvement effort targeted an interdisciplinary group of 55 hospitalists in internal medicine that consisted of 8 nurse practitioners, 10 physician assistants, and 38 physicians. The site of this initiative was the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, a 342-bed academic hospital located in the mid-Atlantic United States (Baltimore Maryland). The first phase of our quality improvement project comprised an online survey to identify hospitalists' knowledge, practices, and opinions on inpatient management of pressure injuries and diabetic foot complications. The second phase involved semistructured focus groups attended by hospitalists to identify resource gaps and barriers inferred by survey results. Twenty-nine of 55 (52%) hospitalists responded to the survey; 72% indicated no formal training in wound care. Over 90% had little to no confidence in management of pressure injuries and diabetic foot complications. In a separate ranking section of the survey, respondents selected lack of knowledge/confidence 12 of 29 (41.3%) and resources 9 of 29 (31.0%) as number 1 barriers to wound care. Managing patients with obesity was identified as a second major barrier from 10 of 29 selected options (34.5%). Eighteen of 55 (33%) hospitalists attended focus group sessions acknowledging barriers to wound care that included provider education, information technology, system factors, and interprofessional engagement. Attendees welcomed additional educational and ancillary resource support.


Assuntos
Médicos Hospitalares/psicologia , Avaliação das Necessidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Percepção , Cicatrização , Adulto , Competência Clínica/normas , Pé Diabético/terapia , Feminino , Grupos Focais/métodos , Médicos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera por Pressão/terapia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...