High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy appears safe in patients with high baseline International Prostate Symptom Scores.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to report our institutional quality of life data for those undergoing high-dose-rate brachytherapy with an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥15 compared with those with an IPSS <15. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The charts of 95 patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with high-dose-rate as monotherapy or as a boost after external beam radiation therapy at a single institution between 2012 and 2015 were reviewed. All patients completed the IPSS and Expanded Prostate Index for Prostate Cancer-Clinical Practice quality of life assessments before treatment and at least one followup survey. Linear mixed models were performed to test for significant changes and differences in each outcome over time. RESULTS: Median followup in the IPSS <15 group was 23 months and 16 months in the IPSS ≥15 group. Median prostate volume was 46.3 cc and 45.4 cc, respectively (p = 0.901). IPSS, incontinence, and urinary irritation/obstruction scores were significantly higher in the IPSS ≥15 group compared with the IPSS <15 group at baseline (all p ≤ 0.05). By the >24 months time point, these scores had decreased below baseline and were not significantly different from those with a baseline IPSS <15 (all p > 0.1). 12.5% in the IPSS ≥15 group developed a new Grade 2 genitourinary toxicity requiring an alpha blocker compared with 26.5% in the IPSS <15 group (p = 0.34). No patients required emergency placement of a foley catheter within 30 days of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Given the low rates of genitourinary toxicity, this technique appears appropriate even for those with high baseline urinary symptoms.

Patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes after HDR brachytherapy between small (<60 cc) and large (≥60 cc) prostate glands.

PURPOSE: Patients with large prostate glands are underrepresented in clinical trials incorporating brachytherapy due to concerns for excessive toxicity. We sought to compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes between small (<60 cc) and large (≥60 cc) prostates treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-B). METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred thirty patients at Emory University were treated with HDR-B monotherapy (n = 75) or HDR-B in combination with external beam radiation therapy (n = 55). American Urologic Association Symptom Score (AUASS) and expanded prostate cancer index composite for clinical practice (EPIC-CP) scores were recorded. A linear mixed model was performed dichotomizing prostate volume (<60 and ≥ 60 cc) with AUASS, individual EPIC-CP domains (urinary incontinence, urinary irritation/obstruction [UIO], bowel function, sexual function, and vitality/hormonal function), and overall EPIC-CP HRQOL scores. RESULTS: Median followup was 22.6 months (range 2.2-55.8). The median gland volume for the entire cohort (n = 130), <60 cc cohort (n = 104), and ≥60 cc cohort (n = 26) was 44 cc, 41.1 cc, and 68.0 cc, respectively. There were no baseline differences in HRQOL scores between cohorts. At 2 months, AUASS and UIO scores increased similarly between cohorts (AUASS p = 0.807; UIO p = 0.539), then decreased (longitudinal effect p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively) to remain not significantly different at 12 months (AUASS p = 0.595; UIO p = 0.673). Overall, prostate volume was not significantly associated with change in AUASS (p = 0.403), urinary incontinence (p = 0.322), UIO symptoms (p = 0.779), bowel symptoms (p = 0.757), vitality/hormonal symptoms (p = 0.503), or overall HRQOL (p = 0.382). CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately selected patients, HDR-B appears well tolerated in patients with ≥60 cc prostate glands without an increase in patient-reported toxicity. Volume should not be a strict contraindication in those with adequate baseline function.

Hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy in combination with HDR boost for localized prostate cancer: patient reported quality of life outcomes.

PURPOSE: There is limited data to support the use of hypofractionated external beam radiation (HypoF) in combination with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR). We report our quality of life (QOL) outcomes when treating intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients with external beam radiation (EBRT) plus HDR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The charts of 54 patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with standard fractionation (SF) or HypoF EBRT plus HDR boost at a single institution between 2012 and 2015 were reviewed. All patients completed the American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUASS) and Expanded Prostate Index for Prostate Cancer - Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) quality of life assessments prior to treatment and completed at least one follow-up survey. Linear mixed models were performed to test for significant changes and differences in each outcome over time. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in AUA score (p = 0.98), incontinence (urge) and urinary irritation/obstruction scores (p = 0.81 and p = 0.62, respectively), and bowel QOL (p = 0.97) between the two dosing groups over time or at any discrete time point. For both groups, AUA scores peaked at 0-2 months before improving. Likewise, sexual function, vitality score, and QOL scores were also not significantly different between the dose groups over time (p = 0.59, p = 0.37, and p = 0.71, respectively). All QOL categories, except sexual function, trended toward baseline with increasing time from intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests HypoF EBRT can be delivered in combination with HDR for patients with ntermediate-risk and high-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate without increasing toxicity compared to SF with an HDR boost.

Brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer in the modern era: a comparison of patient-reported quality of life outcomes among different techniques.

PURPOSE: To report our institutional quality of life (QOL) data for low-dose-rate (LDR) monotherapy (LDR mono), high-dose-rate (HDR) monotherapy (HDR mono), and EBRT with an HDR brachytherapy boost (HDR boost). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The charts of 165 patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with LDR monotherapy (LDR mono), HDR monotherapy (HDR mono), and EBRT with an HDR brachytherapy boost (HDR boost) at a single institution between 2012 and 2015 were reviewed. All patients completed the American Urological Association symptom score (AUASS) and Expanded Prostate Index for Prostate Cancer - Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) quality of life assessments prior to treatment and at least one follow-up survey. Time points included baseline, ≤ 2 months, 2-≤ 6 months, 6-≤ 12 months, 12-≤ 18 months, 18-≤ 24 months, 24-≤ 30 months, and > 30 months. Linear mixed models were performed to test for significant changes and differences in each outcome over time. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 19.5 months. All major functional QOL domains were affected after treatment with brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. All domains improved over time, with the exception of sexual function scores for all groups and urinary incontinence scores for the HDR mono group. Patients treated with LDR did have higher AUA, irritability/obstructive symptoms, incontinence, bowel, and QOL scores acutely compared to the HDR and HDR + boost groups. Vitality scores were significantly worse in the HDR boost group both acutely and at the > 30-month time point. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving HDR brachytherapy had lower acute urinary and rectal toxicity compared to the patients receiving LDR, even when combined with EBRT. However, long-term toxicity was similar.