Immunobiology of cancer stem cells and their immunoevasion mechanisms.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) defined as a small fraction of cells within malignancies have been isolated from tumors with different histological origins with stem related characteristics such as self-replicating potential, tumorigenesis, and therapy resistance. The dynamic communication between CSCs and tumor microenvironment particularly immune cells orchestrates their fate and plasticity as well as the patient outcome. According to recent evidence, it has been reported that they harness different immunological pathways to escape immunosurveillance and express aberrantly immunomodulatory agents or decreased levels of factors forming antigen presenting machinery (APM), subsequently followed by impaired antigen presentation and suppressed immune detection. As effective therapies are expected to be able to eradicate CSCs, mechanistic understanding of such interactions can provide insights into causes of therapy failure particularly in immunotherapy. Also, it can contribute to enhance the practical interventions against CSCs and their immunomodulatory features resulting in CSCs eradication and improving patient clinical outcome. The aim of this review is to explain the present knowledge regarding the immunobiology of CSCs and the immunoevasion mechanisms they use.

Adipose-derived human mesenchymal stem cells seeded on denuded or stromal sides of the amniotic membrane improve angiogenesis and collagen remodeling and accelerate healing of the full-thickness wound.

Several strategies have been proposed to enhance wound healing results. Along with other forms of wound dressing, the human amniotic membrane (HAM) has long been regarded as a biological wound dressing that decreases infection and enhances healing. This study investigates the feasibility and effectiveness of wound healing using decellularized HAM (dAM) and stromal HAM (sAM) in combination with adipose-derived human mesenchymal stem cells (AdMSCs). The dAM and sAM sides of HAM were employed as wound dressing scaffolds, and AdMSCs were seeded on top of either dAM or sAM. Sixty healthy Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups: untreated wound, dAM/AdMSCs group, and sAM/AdMSCs group. The gene expression of VEGF and COL-I was measured in vitro. Wound healing was examined after wounding on days 3, 7, 14, and 21. The expression level of VEGF was significantly higher in sAM/AdMSCs than dAM/AdMSCs (P ≤ 0.05), but there was no significant difference in COL-I expression (P ≥ 0.05). In vivo research revealed that on day 14, wounds treated with sAM/AdMSCs had more vascularization than wounds treated with dAM/AdMSCs (P ≤ 0.01) and untreated wound groups on days 7 (P ≤ 0.05) and 14 (P ≤ 0.0001), respectively. On days 14 (P < 0.05 for sAM/AdMSCs, P < 0.01 for dAM/AdMSCs), and 21 (P < 0.05 for sAM/AdMSCs, P < 0.01 for dAM/AdMSCs), the collagen deposition in the wound bed was significantly thicker in the sAM/AdMSCs and dAM/AdMSCs groups compared to untreated wounds. The study demonstrated that the combination of sAM and AdMSCs promotes wound healing by enhancing angiogenesis and collagen remodeling.