Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aktuelle Urol ; 45(5): 374-6, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25166856

RESUMO

Retropubic tumours without contact to bones or surrounding tissues are extremely rare with only 22 cases being reported in the literature. The majority of tumours described within these reports are osteochondromas in 17 cases, 2 cases of leiomyoma and one case of each fibroma, fibrosarcoma and nodular fasciitis. We now report the case of a 52-year-old-man with a retropubic ganglion cyst, which was resected "in toto" by laparoscopy.


Assuntos
Coristoma/diagnóstico , Cistos Glanglionares/diagnóstico , Pelve Menor , Sínfise Pubiana , Coristoma/patologia , Coristoma/cirurgia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Disuria/etiologia , Endossonografia , Cistos Glanglionares/patologia , Cistos Glanglionares/cirurgia , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatite/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
Urologe A ; 52(12): 1679-83, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24042489

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Despite objective published data regarding rehabilitation of erectile function (EF) after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (nsRP) the gold-standard treatment is still under debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of the different treatment options in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2010 and May 2012 a questionnaire was sent to urologists in outpatient, general and university hospitals and rehabilitation hospitals in Germany. The survey consisted of various questions concerning, e.g. if and what kind of therapy urologists choose to support rehabilitation of EF after nsRP. Further questions dealt with the frequency, duration and optimal start of the chosen therapy. RESULTS: Currently 188 urologists have completed and returned the questionnaire. The distribution was urologists in hospitals n=79 and outpatient/ambulatory n=106, with 24 % performing surgical treatment and urologists in rehabilitation hospitals n=3. The question about the rehabilitation concept showed 39 different forms of treatment within this group. To increase EF after nsRP PDE5 inhibitors were mostly administered (88 %) with 45 % on request compared to 55 %on a daily or regular basis ≥ 3 times/week. The use of penile injection therapy, medicated urethral system for erection (MUSE) and vacuum constriction devices (VCD) was prescribed by 32 %, 6 % and 30 % of urologists, respectively. Only 14 % of the urologists did not choose any active kind of rehabilitation treatment for EF recovery after nsRP. CONCLUSION: Many different therapeutic concepts are currently performed in Germany to increase EF recovery after nsRP. The use of PDE5 inhibitors is the most commonly chosen treatment option. Despite published data regarding effectiveness, the optimal treatment seems to be still unknown.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/reabilitação , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/efeitos adversos , Prótese de Pênis/estatística & dados numéricos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/reabilitação , Coleta de Dados , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...