RESUMO
Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing drastically and affecting the individuals globally, especially in the low- and middle-income countries like India. The poor glycaemic control results in micro-vascular and macro-vascular complications, leading to dysfunction of multiple organs. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the risk factors and microalbuminuria levels among patients with type 2 DM on oral hypoglycaemic agents. Materials and Methods: Hundred type 2 DM patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected by convenient random sampling. Demographic details, biochemical markers, and anti-diabetic medication details were collected. The findings were analyzed statistically using Chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS software 21.0. Results: Among the different combination therapies, 59% were commonly using metformin and teneligliptin. There was a significant association noted between microalbuminuria and risk factors like age, duration of disease, body mass index (BMI) (25.5 ± 2.9), fasting blood sugar (151 ± 53.2 mg/dL), post prandial blood sugar (227.01 ± 70.9 mg/dL), blood urea (24.42 ± 9.3 mg/dL), and serum creatinine (1.5 ± 0.2 mg/dL) (P < 0.001). One-way ANOVA showed statistical significance between microalbuminuria and the different treatment groups (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Microalbuminuria was associated with age, duration of diabetes, glycaemic control, and BMI. In contrast, there was no significant difference noted between the genders and microalbuminuria. Microalbuminuria is an early indication of nephropathy in diabetes patients. The early identification of the risk factors is important, and it is always recommended to screen for microalbuminuria in all the diabetic patients for early detection and prevention of diabetic nephropathy and their associated complications.
RESUMO
Introduction: Remdesivir, an antiviral drug, received an emergency use authorization for treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Though many studies have reported the safety aspects of this antiviral agent, most of them were observed in severely ill COVID-19 patients, making very less data available in the moderately ill patients. The present study was conducted with an objective of finding the adverse events (AEs) associated with remdesivir in moderately ill COVID-19 patients. Methodology: A retrospective observational study was conducted by collecting data of demographic details and details of remdesivir, laboratory investigations, and AEs from the patient medical records from May to July 2021 and analyzed by using the appropriate statistics. Results: Out of the 160 COVID-19 patients, 32 were moderately ill (males: 29, females: 03) and were treated with remdesivir along with steroids and low molecular weight heparin (LMW) heparin. The average number of administered remdesivir doses was 4, with a loading dose of 200 mg and a maintenance dose of 100 mg. A total of 41 AEs were observed out of which 17 were adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (a significant increase in the alanine transaminase (ALT) [P < 0.001]) and 23 AEs (a significant rise in random blood sugars, RBS [one of the AEs] [P = 0.007]). The AEs were more commonly seen in the hypertensive patients. An increased oxygen requirement was a major serious AE observed in four patients. Conclusion: Remdesivir caused a significant increase in the liver enzymes. Increased blood sugar levels were the most common AE and increased oxygen requirement was the major serious AE observed.
RESUMO
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) as alternatives or more often as complementary to the conventional antimicrobials have been developed for the management of infectious conditions for the past two decades. These pharmacotherapeutic strategies are inevitable as the burden of antimicrobial resistance is far-reaching in recent times. MAbs are part of the targeted pharmacotherapy armamentarium with a high degree of specificity - hence, exert comparatively superior efficacy and tolerability than the conventional polyclonal antisera. So far, only five mAbs have been approved for the management of infectious states, since the marketing authorization (1998) given to palivizumab (Synagis®) for the prophylaxis of lower respiratory tract disease caused by a respiratory syncytial virus in pediatric patients. Ibalizumab-uiyk (Trogarzo™) used for the management of multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection not yielding to at least 10 antiretroviral drugs, was approved recently. Among the three antibacterial mAbs, raxibacumab (ABthrax®/ Anthrin®) and obiltoxaximab (Anthim®) are indicated for the treatment and prophylaxis of inhalation anthrax due to Bacillus anthracis; bezlotoxumab (Zinplava®) is used to reduce the recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection. There are also around 30 and 15 mAbs in different phases of development for viral and bacterial conditions. As alternatives to the traditional antivirals and antibacterials, the antimicrobial mAbs are the need of the hour. These mAbs are more relevant to the management of conditions like emerging viral outbreaks wherein there is a lack of prophylactic vaccines. The current cutting-edge engineering technologies revolutionizing the production of mAbs include phagedisplayed antibody libraries, cloning from single-memory B cells or single-antibody-secreting plasma B cells, proteomics-directed cloning of mAbs from serum clubbed with high-throughput sequencing techniques. Yet, the cost of manufacture continues to be the main limiting factor. In this review, the different therapeutic monoclonal antibodies directed against the microbial pathogens are discussed.
