Reversal of colpocleisis-A surgical technique for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.

Given the rarity of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after obliterative procedures and the paucity of data in the literature on this topic, optimal management is challenging. We describe a technique of reversal of colpocleisis in an 81-year-old woman with recurrent prolapse as the first step in a staged, reconstructive procedure. Basic principles underlying our approach include multidisciplinary team involvement, detailed preoperative planning, and a series of investigations including different imaging modalities and a meticulous stepwise surgical technique. The distortion of anatomical planes, anticipated scarring, and close proximity of pelvic organs specifically bladder and rectum are important considerations. In our case, the multidisciplinary surgical team included urogynecologists, a urologist, and a colorectal surgeon. Detailed preoperative planning was agreed following multiple patient and team consultations. Preoperative investigations included ultrasound and videourodynamics. Intraoperatively, cystoscopy and sigmoidoscopy were performed to identify anatomical landmarks and planes, rule out fistulae, and evaluate for anatomical distortions involving pelvic organs. Subsequently, reversal of the colpocleisis was undertaken and uneventful. Postoperative recovery was uncomplicated and a sacrospinous fixation, anterior vaginal repair, and perineorrhaphy were performed as a secondary restorative procedure for the correction of recurrent prolapse.

Monitoring photographic proof of cecal intubation: A closed-loop audit of best practice colonoscopy.

Gold standard colonoscopy in the UK demands a 90% cecal intubation (CI) rate. Endoscopists must provide photographic evidence of CI, which can include images of the terminal ileum, appendix orifice, anastomosis or ileocecal valve. Whilst photographic proof of intubation should be obtained for all complete colonoscopies, this is not routinely audited. Three hundred and ninety-six complete colonoscopies were analyzed, 200 in an initial audit, and 196 in a second audit. Photos taken during colonoscopy were reviewed for evidence of successful CI, as well as whether these photographs had been marked as "proof of intubation" (POI). Results were shared at departmental governance meetings in order to assess any improvement in practice. Initial audit revealed 70% of colonoscopies had provided sufficient proof of CI but only 50% provided photographs that were described as such. Twenty percent of colonoscopies provided sufficient images, but these were not identified as POI. Thirty percent of all colonoscopies provided insufficient proof of CI. Upon repeat audit, 71% of colonoscopies met best practice standards, with the remaining 29% showing insufficient evidence of CI. In the modern era of digital technology, lack of photographic evidence should be seen as unacceptable and may raise important clinical and medicolegal concerns. We recommend that audits such as this become standard practice to ensure best practice.