Challenges in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hemolytic anemia: A case-based approach. Experience from a tertiary care hospital in the Haryana region.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare immune disorder which occurs when antibodies are directed against self red blood cells (RBCs) leading to hemolysis. AIHA is widely classified as warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia, cold agglutinin syndrome, mixed AIHA, paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria and rarely drug induced AIHA. The pathogenesis of AIHA is complex interplay between genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation and enviornmental triggers. A direct antiglobulin test can be used to assess the immunological origin of the hemolysis in order to diagnose AIHA after identifying laboratory and clinical symptoms of hemolysis. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to understand underlying mechanism in AIHAs, and usage of targeted therapies to modulate specific components of the immune response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We are hereby presenting a case series of 11 clinically suspected cases of AIHA in collaboration with their clinical features, immuno-hematological and other laboratory parameters, Flow cytometric analysis of lymphocyte subset in relevant cases, underlying etiology as well as serological subtype are also included. RESULTS: Majority of the patients were categorized as secondary AIHA (7/11, 63.63%). Out of 11 cases 7 were serologically subtyped as warm AIHA (7/11, 63.63%) ,2 cases were DaaT negative AIHA (2/11;18.18%), 2 cases were characterized as mixed AIHA subtype (2/11, 18.18%). CONCLUSION: Accurate subtyping of AIHA requires a systematic immunohematological approach coupled with comprehensive evaluations of clinical, hematological, and biochemical parameters.

Changes in hematological parameters post plateletpheresis: Single center study from North India.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing demand for platelet transfusion implies the need to recruit greater numbers of donors. We planned this study to evaluate donor safety issues with regards to changes in hematological values after plateletpheresis to improve donor safety and satisfaction. MATERIALS & METHODS: The study was conducted on 1000 healthy plateletpheresis donors over a period of 24 months. Pre- and post-apheresis hematological parameters of donors were analyzed. Recovery of platelet was also observed in plateletpheresis donor who returned to after 48 h. RESULT: We observed that the Platelet counts decreased significantly in the plateletpheresis donors (p=<0.001) after each procedure and there was a non-significant decline in Hb (p = 0.34), Hct (p = 0.44) and RBCs (p = 0.08). The hematological changes were within the normal limits with no clinical evidence of anemia or thrombocytopenia. Recovery of platelets in plateletpheresis donors after 48 h was observed in 30 donors (0.03 %). CONCLUSION: A significant immediate post procedure decrease in platelet count was observed in our study but the recovery of platelets was adequate suggesting next platelet collection from the donor can be safely done after a period of 48 h.

Prevalence of irregular red cell antibody in healthy blood donors attending a tertiary care hospital in North India.

BACKGROUND: Alloantibodies may be detected in blood donors who have either been transfused previously or female donors with previous obstetric events. These antibodies can occasionally cause severe transfusion reaction, if a large amount of plasma or whole blood is transfused, as in massive transfusions and pediatric patients. AIMS: The present study aims to assess the prevalence of red cell antibodies in healthy blood donors at a tertiary care hospital-based blood bank in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 82,153 donor samples were screened for irregular red cell antibodies between January 2012 and December 2015 at the Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi. Antibody screening was performed by solid phase method using Immucor Capture-R ready screen (pooled cells) on fully automated immunohematology analyzer Galileo Neo (Immucor Inc., Norcross, GA, USA). Positive tests were further confirmed using Capture-R ready screen (4 cell panel). Advanced investigations to identify the antibody/ies were performed on confirmed positive samples. Antibody identification was conducted using various cell panels (Immucor Capture-R Ready-ID, Panocell-10, Ficin Treated). An advanced technique such as adsorption and elution was performed as per requirement. RESULTS: Screening with pooled cells and 4 cell panel was positive in 227 donors (0.27%), 150 of these donors had autoantibodies, 1 had autoantibodies with underlying alloantibody anti-Jka (0.001%), and 76 had alloantibodies (0.09%) alone in their plasma. Anti-M was the most common antibody (43 donors) identified, followed by anti-D (21 donors). Anti-N was detected in 4; anti-Jka, anti-C, and anti-E in two donors each followed by anti-P1 and anti-Leb in 1 donor. CONCLUSION: Antibodies against red cells can be present in healthy donors detection of which is important in providing safe blood to the patient. The prevalence of red blood cell antibody in healthy donors in this study was found to be 0.27%, while the prevalence of alloantibodies was 0.09%. The majority of alloantibodies were anti-M (56.57%) and anti-D (27.63%).