Hypoxia as a potential cause of dyspareunia.

Dyspareunia is genital pain before, during or after penile-vaginal sexual intercourse. The prevalence of dyspareunia ranges from 8 to 22%. Sexual intercourse concomitant with a pelvic organic lesion is likely to cause pain in most cases. However, in these cases, the pain depends not only on sexual intercourse. In its basic definition, dyspareunia in women is considered an idiopathic affection without a typical organic constitution. It is only present with penile-vaginal penetration. Long-term hypoxia in perineal muscles can cause muscle and perimuscular changes, leading to chronic pain not sufficiently responding to standard therapy. During the entrance examination to our previous study on dyspareunia, we noted significantly lower pulse oximetry levels in the perineal area of affected women. We aimed to compare pulse oximetry oxygen saturation (SpO2) of dyspareunia-affected women to healthy, pain-free women. A retrospective study was performed. The study participants were women who had participated in our previously published study on dyspareunia. This retrospective study was approved by the Ethical Committee. The study included 62 women: 31 dyspareunia-affected women in the treatment group and 31 healthy women in the control group. METHOD: During their examinations, women in the dyspareunia and control groups were measured for SpO2. The procedure was performed in the vulvo-perineal rear region, involving the commissure and the bulbospongiosus muscle. Median and mean SpO2 were compared between the treatment and control groups. Testing for sample size accuracy was performed retroactively. RESULTS: There were 31 participants in each group. The SpO2 data were skewed and did not follow a Gaussian distribution. The Mann-Whitney U test was run to determine differences in perineum oximetry between the treatment group and controls. The median SpO2 was 91 in the treatment group and 92 in the control group. This difference was statistically significant, p = 0.002. Sample size accuracy was assured by post hoc calculation. CONCLUSIONS: Idiopathic dyspareunia is inherent in cohabitation muscle pain that standard therapy could not explain nor treat. We detected clinically meaningfully decreased levels of SpO2 in affected patients. We compared pelvic oximetry between dyspareunia-affected women in the treatment and control groups. This comparison showed significant hypoxia in the perineal muscle area (p = 0.002). Our results may help us understand the source of this pain and guide treatment accordingly.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for treating dyspareunia: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Dyspareunia is a genital pain during or after penile-vaginal sexual intercourse. It is a painful spasm of the pelvic muscles that partly or entirely disables vaginal penetration. OBJECTIVES: We examined the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on idiopathic non-organic dyspareunia in women. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted. METHODS: The study included 62 women who reported dyspareunia. Patients in the treatment and placebo groups received ESWT perineally weekly for 4 consecutive weeks; placebo patients received placebo stand-off treatment. The grade of dyspareunia was estimated by using the Marinoff Dyspareunia Scale and subjective pain intensity on a visual analog scale (VAS) before and after treatment. Follow-ups were conducted 1, 4 and 12 weeks after the final ESWT session. RESULTS: The study included 61 women. The treatment but not placebo group differed by the Marinoff Dyspareunia Scale and VAS. Differences before and after treatment within groups were all P<0.001 and between groups, P<0.001. Pain reduction was always>30%. The effect sizes were both large: Marinoff 0.825 and VAS 0.883. CONCLUSIONS: ESWT significantly reduced subjective pain in our women treated for dyspareunia.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for treatment of vulvodynia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no effective therapy strategies for idiopathic, non-organic vulvodynia in women. ESWT (extracorporeal shock wave therapy) is a nonsurgical/noninvasive technique widely used to treat musculoskeletal diseases, muscle spasticity and hypertonia, renal and biliary calculi and urological disorders. AIM: We examined the effects of ESWT on vulvodynia in women. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted between 2015 and 2018 following a feasibility study. SETTING: Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital departments. POPULATION: The study included 62 women with vulvodynia for at least 3 months. METHODS: The women were randomly assigned to either a treatment group (N.=31) or a placebo group (N.=31). The patients in the treatment group received perineally applied ESWT weekly (3000 pulses each for four consecutive weeks). The energy flux density was 0.25 mJ/mm2, frequency 4 Hz, focus zone 0-30 mm, therapeutic efficacy 0-90 mm, stand-off II. The device used was a standard electromagnetic shock wave unit with a focused shock wave handpiece. The position of the shock wave transducer was changed six times after every 500 pulses. Patients in the placebo group underwent the same treatment procedure, but the handpiece was provided with a placebo stand-off that disabled energy transmission. Subjective pain was self-evaluated by each patient using two tools before and after treatment: a 10 cm linear visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-10) and a cotton-swab test (CST, Goetsch scale 0-4). Follow-ups were done 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-ESWT. RESULTS: In all, 61 women completed the study. We tested for differences in the VAS and CST within and between the treatment and placebo groups. The testing was between before treatment and particular follow-up. We found significant changes in the treatment group. Reductions in VAS (P<0.01) and CST (P<0.01) were observed at all three follow-ups. At all assessments, pain reduction was always >30%. In the placebo group there were no statistically significant changes between before and after treatment. There were no differences between the treatment and placebo groups before treatment but statistically significant differences at all three follow-ups (VAS P<0.01); CST P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: ESWT seems to reduce pain perception in our treatment group. Thus, we are encouraged to explore this technique further. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The method is easily replicable, inexpensive, and without known side effects.