RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe the response and relapse of severe thrombocytopenia in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with different treatments. METHOD: We performed a retrospective cohort study, which included SLE patients who were hospitalized for thrombocytopenia of less than 30,000/µL platelets, from January 2012 to December 2021. Demographic and clinical information was obtained from clinical records. Kaplan-Meier and logrank test were performed. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients, mostly women (83%) with a median age of 31 years, were included in the study. Eight patients (17%) relapsed within a median period of 35.7 weeks. Initial acute treatment with prednisone at 1 mg/kg/day was as effective as glucocorticoid pulses. However, induction treatment with cyclophosphamide (CYC) had the lowest remission rate (43%, p = 0.034). There was no significant difference in relapse-free survival (RFS) among the acute glucocorticoid treatments. CYC induction was associated with lower RFS compared to rituximab (RTX) (CYC 43.6 weeks vs. RTX 51.8 weeks, p = 0.040) or azathioprine (AZA) (CYC 43.6 weeks vs. AZA 51.2 weeks, p = 0.024). Administration of antimalarials was associated with longer RFS (51.6 weeks vs. 45.0 weeks, p = 0.021). Factors such as antiphospholipid syndrome, IgG anti-ß2 glycoprotein I positivity, renal and additional hematologic SLE activity during follow-up significantly reduced RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar response of acute glucocorticoid regimens, induction therapy with AZA or RTX resulted in a longer RFS compared to CYC. Adding an antimalarial also improved RFS. Our study provides evidence that may help develop better treatment strategies for severe thrombocytopenia in SLE patients. Key Points ⢠Induction therapy with azathioprine or rituximab provided longer relapse-free survival in SLE thrombocytopenia compared with cyclophosphamide. ⢠Antimalarial administration was associated with longer relapse-free survival in SLE thrombocytopenia. ⢠Antiphospholipid syndrome, IgG anti-ß2 glycoprotein I positivity, as well as renal and additional hematologic SLE activity during follow-up, decreased relapse-free survival.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colchicine is an available, safe, and effective anti-inflammatory drug and has been suggested as a COVID-19 treatment, but its usefulness in hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients has not been thoroughly demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: To address the safety and efficacy of colchicine in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. DESIGN: We conducted a triple-blind parallel non-stratified placebo-controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 116 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 in Mexico. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive 1.5 mg of colchicine or placebo at the time of the recruitment in the study (baseline) and 0.5 mg BID PO to complete 10 days of treatment. MAIN MEASURES: The primary composite outcome was the progression to critical disease or death. Besides, we evaluated immunological features at baseline and after recovery or disease progression in 20 patients. KEY RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were allocated to colchicine and 60 patients received placebo. The study was suspended after the second interim analysis demonstrated colchicine had no effect on the primary outcome (OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.35-1.93, P = 0.67), nor in the days of ICU and hospital stays. Adverse events were similar between groups (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.66-3.88, P = 0.37). After colchicine treatment, patients had higher BUN and lower serum levels of IL-8, IL-12p70, and IL-17A. CONCLUSIONS: Colchicine is safe but not effective in the treatment of severe COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04367168.
