RESUMO
Objective: Accidental fracture of epidural analgesia catheters has a very low incidence of 2.5 per 100,000 anesthesia. A rare image of the fracture is reported. Methods: A 42-year-old female patient was attending a cesarean section eight years earlier to her consult. In the cesarean section, she received regional epidural anesthesia, and the main complaint was low back pain, specifically between the spinous processes L2 and L3. The somatic pain had been presenting intermittently for eight years. The sagittal section of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine showed a "golf club" image from the midline to the laminae of L2 and L3 with the subcutaneous tissue. Results: A small right hemilaminectomy was performed to remove the complete catheter, which did not adhere, but was coiled in the S-shape. The catheter was trapped between the left facets of L2 and L3 laterally than through the midline. Several risk factors and therapeutic procedures have been proposed. Conclusion: In a systematic review, 24 articles were reported on this specific issue. No surgical procedure and follow-up were informed by 8 authors. Surgical remotion by laminectomy was used in 9 articles, surgical explanation by skin incision was reported by 4 authors, and remotion by endoscopy was reported in 1 article. Two articles not reported solution.
RESUMO
Resumen: Introducción: la dexmedetomidina es un adyuvante en el manejo anestésico perioperatorio y si se administra por vía nasal las dosis requeridas tienen mínimos efectos secundarios. Material y métodos: ensayo clínico aleatorizado doble ciego en pacientes sometidos a colecistectomía laparoscópica con anestesia general, comparando la dexmedetomidina intranasal (1 μg/kg de peso ideal) contra placebo, se comparó el efecto analgésico postoperatorio por medio de la escala visual análoga del dolor (EVA) y el consumo de opioides transanestésico. El análisis estadístico se realizó con t de Student y exacta de Fisher. Resultados: se incluyeron 54 pacientes aleatorizados en dos grupos: dexmedetomidina y control. El 81.5% de los sujetos fueron mujeres, no se encontró diferencia entre los grupos en las variables demográficas. La media de la calificación EVA a los 60 minutos para el grupo dexmedetomidina fue (2.89 ± 1.9), estadísticamente inferior comparada contra el grupo control (5.78 ± 2.3) (p ˂ 0.0001). El consumo de opioides para dexmedetomidina fue (0.424 ± 0.074 μg/h) estadísticamente menor al control (0.697 ± 0.136 μg/h) (p ˂ 0.0001) con un tamaño del efecto de Cohen de 250%. Conclusiones: disminución significativa en EVA y en el consumo de opioides con el uso de dexmedetomidina intranasal en colecistectomía laparoscópica.
Abstract: Introduction: dexmedetomidine is and useful adjuvant agent in the perioperative anesthetic management associated to nasal administration with minimum adverse effects. Material and methods: a randomized, controlled, double blind, clinical trial was carried out in elective patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with general anesthesia. Aim of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic effect through visual analogue scale (VAS) and the perioperative opioid consumption. Dexmedetomidine was administrated intranasally (1 μg/kg dose) versus placebo. Statistical analysis was realized through student t and Fisher Test. Results: 54 patients were randomized in two groups: dexmedetomidine vs control. Not significant differences were found between both groups in demographic variables but 81.5% were women. Mean of VAS score at 60 minutes was significantly inferior (2.89 ± 1.9) versus control group (5.78 ± 2.3) (p ˂ 0.0001). Mean of opioids consumption in dexmedetomidine group (0.424 ± 0.074 μg/h) was significant minor of control group (0.697 ± 0.136 μg/h) (p ˂ 0.0001). Size effect through Cohen test was 250%. Conclusion: statistically decrease in VAS and in opioid consumption was observed using dexmedetomidine nasally in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Agressiveness is a psychiatric symptom that may be part of schizophrenia, mental retardation, drug abuse and other conditions. Surgical treatment remains controversial and few therapeutic options are available. We undertook this study to perform a prospective analysis on the efficacy and safety of bilateral cingulotomy and anterior capsulotomy in the treatment of aggressiveness behavior. METHODS: We studied 25 patients with a primary diagnosis of aggressiveness refractory to conventional treatment. Subjects were clinically evaluated with the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory and the Global Assessment of Functioning score. Lesions were placed stereotactically in both targets and confirmed by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Significant changes were evaluated with Wilcoxon test after 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 12 patients were finally included and surgical treated. Lesions significantly decreased using the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory and the Global Assessment of Functioning score (p <0.002) at 3 and 6 months follow-up. Only five patients showed either mild or transitory postsurgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Combined bilateral anterior capsulotomy and cingulotomy successfully reduced aggressiveness behavior and improved clinical evaluations. These effects were obtained with fewer complications than previously described targets.
