Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of xanomeline for schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: We systematically reviewed extant studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of xanomeline and xanomeline-trospium (KarXT) for treatment of adults with schizophrenia. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, articles were systematically searched for in databases and clinical trial registries. RESULTS: A total of 4 preclinical trials and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review. A 4-week RCT observed a difference of 24.0 points (SD 21.0) in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score between xanomeline and placebo groups (p = 0.039). A 5-week RCT observed PANSS total score changes from baseline to week 5, including -17.4 and -5.9 points in KarXT and placebo groups, respectively (LSMD -11.6 points; 95% CI -16.1 to -7.1; p < 0.001; d = 0.75). Another 5-week RCT observed PANSS total score changes from baseline to week 5, including -21.2 (SE 1.7) and -11.6 (SE 1.6) points in KarXT and placebo groups, respectively (LSMD -9.6; 95% CI -13.9 to -5.2; p < 0.0001; d = 0.61). Side effects include constipation, nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and dry mouth. CONCLUSION: KarXT offers an innovative non-D2 blocking approach, representing a promising treatment avenue for schizophrenia.

Vortioxetine for the treatment of post-COVID-19 condition: a randomized controlled trial.

Hitherto no therapeutic has received regulatory approval for the treatment of post-COVID-19 condition (PCC). Cognitive deficits, mood symptoms and significant reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are highly replicated and debilitating aspects of PCC. We sought to determine the impact of vortioxetine on the foregoing symptoms and HRQoL in persons living with PCC. An 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of adults ≥ 18 years of age residing in Canada and who are experiencing symptoms of World Health Organization (WHO)-defined PCC, with a history of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, was conducted. Recruitment began November 2021 and ended January 2023. Of the 200 participants enrolled (487 invited: 121 ineligible and 59 eligible but declined participation; 307 cleared pre-screening stage), a total of 149 participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either vortioxetine (5-20 mg, n = 75) or placebo (n = 74) daily for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment (i.e. end point). The primary outcome was the change from baseline-to-end point in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. Secondary outcomes included the effect on depressive symptoms and HRQoL, as measured by changes from baseline-to-end point on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology 16-item and WHO Wellbeing Scale 5-item, respectively. A total of 68 (90.7%) participants randomized to vortioxetine and 73 (98.6%) participants randomized to placebo completed all 8 weeks. Between-group analysis did not show a significant difference in the overall change in cognitive function [P = 0.361, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-0.179, 0.492)]. However, in the fully adjusted model, a significant treatment × time interaction was observed in favour of vortioxetine treatment with baseline c-reactive protein (CRP) as a moderator (P = 0.012). In addition, a significant improvement in Digit Symbol Substitution Test scores were observed in vortioxetine versus placebo treated participants in those whose baseline CRP was above the mean (P = 0.045). Moreover, significant improvement was obtained in measures of depressive symptoms [P < 0.001, 95% CI (-4.378, -2.323)] and HRQoL [P < 0.001, 95% CI (2.297, 4.647)] in vortioxetine-treated participants and between the treatment groups [depressive symptoms: P = 0.026, 95% CI (-2.847, -0.185); HRQoL: P = 0.004, 95% CI (0.774, 3.938)]. Although vortioxetine did not improve cognitive function in the unadjusted model, when adjusting for CRP, a significant pro-cognitive effect was observed; antidepressant effects and improvement in HRQoL in this debilitating disorder were also noted.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists as a protective factor for incident depression in patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are widely used for glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and are primarily indicated for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). GLP-1 receptor agonists have also been shown to have neuroprotective and antidepressant properties. Replicated evidence suggests that individuals with DM are significantly more likely to develop depression. Herein, we aim to investigate whether GLP-1 receptor agonists can be used prophylactically on patients with DM to lower the risk of incident depression. We conducted a systematic search for English-language articles published on the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, APA, PsycInfo, Ovid and Google Scholar databases from inception to June 6, 2022. Four retrospective observational studies were identified that evaluated the neuroprotective effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists on incident depression in patients with DM. We found mixed results with regards to lowering the risk of incident depression, with two studies demonstrating a significant reduction in risk and two studies showing no such effect. A single study found that dulaglutide may lower susceptibility to depression. Our results were limited by high interstudy heterogeneity, paucity of literature, and lack of controlled trials. While we did not find evidence of GLP-1 receptor agonists significantly lowering risk of incident depression in patients with DM, promising neuroprotective data presented in two of the included papers, specifically on dulaglutide where information is scarce, provide the impetus for further investigation. Future research should focus on better elucidating the neuroprotective potential of different classes and doses of GLP-1 receptor agonists using controlled trials.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ulotaront (SEP-363856, a trace amine-associated receptor 1 agonist) for the treatment of schizophrenia and other mental disorders: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Schizophrenia is a mental illness that can disrupt emotions, perceptions, and cognition and reduce quality of life. The classical approach to treat schizophrenia is to use typical and atypical antipsychotics; however, limitations include low efficacy in mitigating negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunctions and a range of adverse effects. Evidence has accumulated on trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) as a novel therapeutic target for treating schizophrenia. This systematic review investigates the available evidence on a TAAR1 agonist, ulotaront, as a treatment for schizophrenia. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid databases for English-published articles from inception to 18 December 2022. The literature focusing on the association between ulotaront and schizophrenia was evaluated based on an inclusion/exclusion criterion. Selected studies were assessed for the risk of bias, using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and summarized in a table to generate discussion topics. RESULTS: Three clinical, two comparative, and five preclinical studies examining ulotaront's pharmacology, tolerability and safety, and/or efficacy were identified. Results indicate that ulotaront has a differing adverse effect profile from other antipsychotics, may mitigate metabolic-related adverse effects commonly associated with antipsychotics, and may be effective for treating positive and negative symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the available literature present ulotaront as a potential and promising alternative treatment method for schizophrenia. Despite this, our results were limited due to the lack of clinical trials on ulotaront's long-term efficacy and mechanisms of action. Future research should focus on these limitations to elucidate ulotaront's efficacy and safety for the treatment of schizophrenia and other mental disorders with similar pathophysiology.

The bidirectional association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a complex metabolic-inflammatory disease associated with poor outcomes and decreased quality of life. NAFLD is overrepresented in patients with psychiatric disorders like depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia; however, a comprehensive review on NAFLD and psychiatric disorders remains to be delineated. This review endeavors to investigate the association of NAFLD with psychiatric disorders, including shared pathogenesis and future clinical derivatives. Extant literature suggests that patients with psychiatric disorders (in particular, mood disorders) are more susceptible to the development of NAFLD due to multiple reasons, including but not limited to hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation, metabolic syndrome, and chronic perceived stress. Moreover, the clinical manifestations of mood disorders (e.g., anhedonia, psychomotor retardation, lifestyle modification, etc.), and potentially long-term treatment with weight-gaining agents, differentially affect these patients, making them more prone to NAFLD. Considering the increased morbidity associated with both mood disorders and NAFLD, our review recommends regular screenings for NAFLD in select patients with mood disorders exhibiting signs of increased risk (i.e., obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, or family history of NAFLD) for better diagnosis and holistic care of both potentially interrelated conditions.