Health information management systems and practices in conflict-affected settings: the case of northwest Syria.

BACKGROUND: In conflict settings, as it is the case in Syria, it is crucial to enhance health information management to facilitate an effective and sustainable approach to strengthening health systems in such contexts. In this study, we aim to provide a baseline understanding of the present state of health information management in Northwest Syria (NWS) to better plan for strengthening the health information system of the area that is transitioning to an early-recovery stage. METHODS: A combination of questionnaires and subsequent interviews was used for data collection. Purposive sampling was used to select twenty-one respondents directly involved in managing and directing different domains of health information in the NWS who worked with local NGOs, INGOs, UN-agencies, or part of the Health Working Group. A scoring system for each public health domain was constructed based on the number and quality of the available datasets for these domains, which were established by Checci and others. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: Reliable and aggregate health information in the NWS is limited, despite some improvements made over the past decade. The conflict restricted and challenged efforts to establish a concentrated and harmonized HIS in the NWS, which led to a lack of leadership, poor coordination, and duplication of key activities. Although the UN established the EWARN and HeRAMS as common data collection systems in the NWS, they are directed toward advocacy and managed by external experts with little participation or access from local stakeholders to these datasets. RECOMMENDATIONS: There is a need for participatory approaches and the empowerment of local actors and local NGOs, cooperation between local and international stakeholders to increase access to data, and a central domain for planning, organization, and harmonizing the process. To enhance the humanitarian health response in Syria and other crisis areas, it is imperative to invest in data collection and utilisation, mHealth and eHealth technologies, capacity building, and robust technical and autonomous leadership.

Health aid displacement during a decade of conflict (2011-19) in Syria: an exploratory analysis.

BACKGROUND: Syria has been in continuous conflict since 2011, resulting in more than 874,000 deaths and 13.7 million internally displaced people (IDPs) and refugees. The health and humanitarian sectors have been severely affected by the protracted, complex conflict and have relied heavily on donor aid in the last decade. This study examines the extent and implications of health aid displacement in Syria during acute humanitarian health crises from 2011 to 2019. METHODS: We conducted a trend analysis on data related to humanitarian and health aid for Syria between 2011 and 2019 from the OECD's Creditor Reporting System. We linked the data obtained for health aid displacement to four key dimensions of the Syrian conflict. The data were compared with other fragile states. We conducted a workshop in Turkey and key informants with experts, policy makers and aid practitioners involved in the humanitarian and health response in Syria between August and October 2021 to corroborate the quantitative data obtained by analysing aid repository data. RESULTS: The findings suggest that there was health aid displacement in Syria during key periods of crisis by a few key donors, such as the EU, Germany, Norway and Canada supporting responses to certain humanitarian crises. However, considering that the value of humanitarian aid is 50 times that of health aid, this displacement cannot be considered as critical. Also, there was insufficient evidence of health displacement across all donors. The results also showed that the value of health aid as a proportion of aggregate health and humanitarian aid is only 2% in Syria, compared to 22% for the combined average of fragile states, which further indicates the predominance of humanitarian aid over health aid in the Syrian crisis context. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that in very complex conflict-affected contexts such as Syria, it is difficult to suggest the use of health aid displacement as an effective tool for aid-effectiveness for donors as it does not reflect domestic needs and priorities. Yet there seems to be evidence of slight displacement for individual donors. However, we can suggest that donors vastly prefer to focus their investment in the humanitarian sector rather than the health sector in conflict-affected areas. There is an urgent need to increase donors' focus on Syria's health development aid and adopt the humanitarian-development-peace nexus to improve aid effectiveness that aligns with the increasing health needs of local communities, including IDPs, in this protracted conflict.