Evaluation of efficacy of four laparoscopic needle drivers.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the impact of needle driver design on laparoscopic suturing skills by experts and novices. METHODS: Three experienced laparoscopic surgeons and 3 novice junior residents were asked to perform a fixed set of suturing tasks in a laparoscopic pelvic-trainer. The laparoscopic needle drivers compared were (1) the Ethicon driver (E 705R), (2) Karl Storz (KS) pistol grip (26173 KC), (3) KS finger grip (26167 SK), and (4) KS palm grip (26173 ML). Times were recorded for each operator to grasp and position a needle for suturing in a particular angle, as well as to throw a horizontal and a vertical stitch and tie a single square knot using 2-0 Vicryl suture with a taper CT-1 needle. Subsequently, participants were asked to complete a subjective questionnaire rating the drivers. RESULTS: The average suturing time provided the most discriminatory power in comparing the needle drivers. For experienced operators, the KS pistol grip allowed faster suturing times than did the KS finger grip and the KS palm grip but not the Ethicon driver. For novice users, the Ethicon driver allowed faster suturing times than did the KS finger grip but not the KS pistol grip or the KS palm grip. In the subjective questionnaire, the KS pistol grip received the highest scores, and the KS finger grip received the lowest scores. CONCLUSION: Novice laparoscopists performed best with the KS pistol grip as well as the Ethicon laparoscopic needle drivers while experienced laparoscopists performed best with the pistol grip KS needle driver.

Case report: renal infarct mimicking renal mass: further rationale for minimally invasive management.

A 55-year-old man presented with an exophytic asymptomatic right renal lower-pole mass simulating a renal-cell carcinoma. He underwent retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy, and histopathologic examination revealed a chronic renal infarct with calcifications. We report this case to stimulate the inclusion of focal chronic renal infarct in the differential diagnosis of asymptomatic renal masses, as well as to advocate a minimally invasive approach to appropriate renal lesions.

Novel technique of knotless hemostatic renal parenchymal suture repair during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Free-hand parenchymal suturing during warm-ischemia, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a complex and time-sensitive task. We describe a relatively simpler technique of achieving renal parenchymal hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using a polymer self-locking (Hem-o-Lok) clip.

Novel technique for removal of misdirected laparoscopic Weck clips.

The Weck clip has emerged as an attractive option for laparoscopic vascular control. It is secure and easy to use. However, once fired, the clip can be difficult to remove. We describe a novel technique for the safe removal of misdirected Weck clips using the Harmonic scalpel.

Novel device to assist urethrovesical anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

We evaluated a novel urethral sound (Benique sound-Karl Storz) to assist suturing during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. This sound provides for a more secure grip compared with the traditional sound, thereby affording controlled traction of the gland during the procedure and smooth coordinated movements of the sound during the anastomosis.

Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and perioperative outcomes.

PURPOSE: We compared the results of transperitoneal (T) and retroperitoneal (R) approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in regard to perioperative outcomes and technical considerations, thereby, identifying patient selection guidelines for each approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The choice of approach was dictated primarily by tumor location, that is TLPN for anterior or lateral lesions and RLPN for posterior or posterolateral lesions. The approaches differed primarily by the hilar control technique. During TLPN en bloc hilar control was achieved with a Satinsky clamp, while during RLPN individual vessel control was obtained with bulldog clamps. RESULTS: In a 3-year period 100 TLPNs and 63 RLPNs were performed for renal tumor. Of posterior tumors 77% were managed by RLPN, whereas 97% of anterior tumors were managed by TLPN. TLPN was associated with significantly larger tumors (3.2 vs 2.5 cm, p <0.001), more caliceal suture repairs (79% vs 57%, p = 0.004), longer ischemia time (31 vs 28 minutes, p = 0.04), longer operative time (3.5 vs 2.9 hours, p <0.001) and longer hospital stay (2.9 vs 2.2 days, p <0.01) than RLPN. Blood loss, perioperative complications, postoperative serum creatinine, analgesic requirements and histological outcomes were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: We perform TLPN for all anterior or lateral tumors as well as for large or deeply infiltrating posterior tumors that require substantive resection (heminephrectomy). The limited retroperitoneal space makes RLPN technically more challenging but provides superior access to posterior and particularly posteromedial lesions. When feasible, we prefer to perform laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by the transperitoneal approach because of its larger working area and superior instrument angles for intracorporeal renal reconstruction.

Impact of intraoperative heparin on laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: At many centers systemic heparinization is performed during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy because of concerns regarding graft thrombosis. However, no consensus exists in this regard. We evaluated the impact of intraoperative heparin on donor and recipient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2000 and February 2003, 79 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic live donor left nephrectomy at our institution. They were sequentially divided into 2 groups, that is group 1-the initial 40 patients who intraoperatively received 5,000 IU heparin intravenously and group 2-subsequent patients who did not receive heparin. The 2 groups were well matched demographically. Data were compared using the paired 2-tailed t test. RESULTS: The 2 donor groups were comparable in regard to mean blood loss (139 vs 179 cc, p = 0.59), intraoperative urine output (1.6 vs 1.6 l, p = 0.74), warm ischemia time (4 vs 4.2 minutes, p = 0.52), operative time (3.5 vs 3.5 hours, p = 0.97), and cold ischemia time (75 vs 82 minutes, p = 0.38). Complications occurred in 1 patient in group 1 (rhabdomyolysis induced acute renal failure) and in 2 in group 2 (chylous ascites and lumbar vein injury, respectively). No graft was lost due to vascular thrombosis in either group. Recipient immediate, early and delayed (6-month) graft function was comparable between the 2 groups. Acute rejection occurred in 5 recipients in group 1 and 1 in group 2. There was 1 recipient death per group at delayed followup. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of heparin during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is not necessary. Because of its potential for causing intraoperative or early postoperative hemorrhage, we no longer routinely administer intraoperative heparin during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at our institution.

Dismembered percutaneous endopyeloplasty: a new procedure.

PURPOSE: We recently described a novel technique of percutaneous non-dismembered endopyeloplasty (Fenger type). Herein, we extend this transrenal technique further and report percutaneous dismembered endopyeloplasty (Anderson-Hynes type). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five pigs with unilateral ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction created 3 to 6 weeks earlier, percutaneous dismembered endopyeloplasty was performed. Percutaneous transrenal access to the UPJ was obtained, and the UPJ was completely dismembered from within the renal pelvis through the solitary percutaneous tract. The dismembered proximal ureter was circumferentially mobilized, and in two animals, the UPJ segment was completely excised and removed. A spatulated end-to-end endopyeloplasty anastomosis (Anderson-Hynes) was created transrenally with 5 to 10 interrupted sutures using a novel nephroscopic suturing device (Sew-Right SR-5; LSI Solutions, Rochester, NY). In two animals, the entire percutaneous procedure was performed with CO2 insufflation instead of fluid irrigation. RESULTS: The technique was developed in three pigs. Subsequently, two pigs were treated and sacrificed at 2 and 5 weeks. All UPJs were dismembered successfully, and a precisely sutured mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis was created. Intraoperative bleeding was negligible, and the operative time ranged from 3 to 5 hours, with the majority of the time dedicated to transrenal retroperitoneal dissection of the scarred, fibrotic UPJ. Carbon dioxide insufflation was efficacious because it minimized fluid extravasation and tissue edema and additionally enhanced visibility. Postoperative pyelograms revealed an adequately funneled UPJ, with good flow into the distal ureter. The two survival animals had minimal apparent morbidity from the procedure, and retrograde pyelograms at euthanasia revealed a patent anastomosis without extravasation. A 6F catheter easily crossed the reconstructed UPJ at autopsy in all animals. CONCLUSIONS: Dismembered percutaneous Anderson-Hynes endopyeloplasty is technically feasible and is promising. Further technical experience and additional functional outcome analysis in the survival model are necessary. With the technique described herein, we introduce the concept of percutaneous intrarenal reconstructive surgery (PIRS), wherein advanced intrarenal and retroperitoneal dissection with reconstruction can be performed endourologically, further broadening the horizons of conventional percutaneous techniques.

Improved hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using gelatin matrix thrombin sealant.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether using a biologic hemostatic sealant facilitates hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Secure and durable parenchymal hemostasis is a critical requirement during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. METHODS: Since September 1999, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has been performed in more than 300 patients by a single surgeon, duplicating open surgical principles. Recently, from patient 225 onward, we modified our technique by incorporating topical application of a gelatin matrix thrombin sealant (FloSeal) to cover the partial nephrectomy bed before sutured renorrhaphy over a Surgicel bolster. The impact of FloSeal on reducing hemorrhagic complications was evaluated by comparing two sequential groups of patients: group 1 consisted of 68 patients in whom FloSeal was not used (patients 156 to 224) and group 2 consisted of 63 patients in whom it was used (patients 225 to 288). RESULTS: Groups 1 (no FloSeal) and 2 (FloSeal) were comparable in tumor size, number of central tumors, and performance of pelvicaliceal suture repair (84% versus 92%; P = 0.16). Intraoperative variables were also comparable in terms of mean warm ischemia time (36.1 versus 37.2 minutes; P = 0.55), blood loss (150 versus 106 mL; P = 0.36), operative time, and hospital stay. However, the FloSeal group had significantly fewer overall complications (37% versus 16%; P = 0.008) and tended toward a lower rate of hemorrhagic complications (12% versus 3%), although this did not achieve statistical significance (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study have shown that adjunctive use of gelatin matrix thrombin sealant substantially enhances parenchymal hemostasis and has decreased our procedural and hemorrhagic complications to levels comparable with contemporary open partial nephrectomy series. This gelatin matrix-thrombin tissue sealant is now a routine part of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy at our institution.

The impact of warm ischaemia on renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

UNLABELLED: Authors from Cleveland assessed the impact of warm ischaemia on renal function, using their large database of laparoscopic partial nephrectomies for tumour. While agreeing that renal hilar clamping is essential for precise excision of the tumour, and other elements of the operation, the authors indicate that warm ischaemia may potentially damage the kidney. However, they found that there were virtually no clinical sequelae from warm ischaemic of up to 30 min. They also found that advancing age and pre-existing renal damage increased the risk of postoperative renal damage. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of warm ischaemia on renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for tumour, and to evaluate the influence of various risk factors on renal function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were analysed from 179 patients undergoing LPN for renal tumour under warm ischaemic conditions, with clamping of the renal artery and vein. Renal function was primarily evaluated in two groups of patients: 15 with tumour in a solitary kidney, who were evaluated by serial serum creatinine measurements; and 12 with two functioning kidneys undergoing unilateral LPN, and evaluated by renal scintigraphy before and 1 month after LPN to quantify differential renal function. Also, in all 179 patients, mean serum creatinine data at baseline, 1 day after LPN, at hospital discharge, and at the last follow-up were provided as supportive evidence. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the effect of various risk factors on renal function after LPN, i.e. patient age, baseline serum creatinine, tumour size, solitary kidney status, duration of warm ischaemia, pelvicalyceal suture repair, urine output and intravenous fluids during LPN. RESULTS: In the group of patients with a solitary kidney the mean warm ischaemia time was 29 min, kidney parenchyma excised 29%, and serum creatinine at baseline, discharge, the peak after LPN and at the last follow-up (mean 4.8 months) 1.3, 2.3, 2.8, and 1.8 mg/dL, respectively. One patient (6.6%) required temporary dialysis. In the second group, assessed by renal scintigraphy, the function of the operated kidney was reduced by a mean of 29%, commensurate with the amount of parenchyma excised. For all 179 patients, a combination of age > or = 70 years and a serum creatinine level after LPN of > or = 1.5 mg/dL correlated with a higher serum creatinine after LPN. On logistic regression, baseline serum creatinine and solitary kidney status were the only variables significant for serum creatinine status after LPN. CONCLUSIONS: The bloodless field provided by renal hilar clamping is important for precise tumour excision, pelvicalyceal suture repair and securing parenchymal haemostasis during LPN. However, renal hilar clamping causes warm ischaemia. These data indicate that the clinical sequelae of warm ischaemic renal injury of approximately 30 min are minimal. Advancing age and pre-existing azotaemia increase the risk of renal dysfunction after LPN, especially when the warm ischaemia exceeds 30 min.

Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases.

PURPOSE: We analyzed complications of the initial 200 cases treated with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for a suspected renal tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since August 1999, 200 consecutive patients have undergone laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Mean patient age was 61.6 years, mean body mass index was 29.9 and mean tumor size was 2.9 cm (range 1 to 10). There were 51 central tumors (25%) and 15 solitary kidneys (7.5%). A central tumor was defined as any tumor infiltrating up to the collecting system or renal sinus, during the excision of which entry into and repair of the collecting system was necessary. Mean estimated blood loss was 247 cc and mean operative time was 3.3 hours. Data on complications were obtained from a prospectively maintained computerized database and via telephone calls to patients and/or local referring physicians. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients (33%) had 1 or more complications, which were intraoperative in 11 (5.5%), postoperative in 24 (12%) and delayed in 31 (15.5%). Overall 30 patients (15%) had a non-urological complication and 36 (18%) had a urological complication, including hemorrhage in 19 (9.5%) and urine leakage in 9 (4.5%). Hemorrhage occurred intraoperatively in 7 cases (3.5%) and postoperatively in 4 (2%), while it was delayed in 8 (4%). Of patients with urine leakage none required reoperation, 6 (3%) required a Double-J stent (Medical Engineering Corp., New York, New York) only, 2 (1%) required a Double-J stent with computerized tomography guided drainage and 1 required no treatment. Open conversion was necessary in 2 patients (1%), reoperation was done in 4 (2%) and elective laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed in 1 (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is an advanced procedure with potential for complications. It requires considerable experience with reconstructive laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large (greater than 7 cm, T2) renal tumors.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has emerged as a standard of care in appropriate candidates with clinical stage T1 renal tumors (7 cm or less). Herein we present our experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for clinical stage T2 tumors (greater than 7 cm). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy between September 1997 and July 2003 were retrospectively subdivided into group LAPT1-166 with tumor size 7 cm and group LAPT2-65 with tumor size greater than 7 cm. Also, group LAPT2 was compared with a group of 34 contemporary, comparable patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy for tumor greater than 7 cm (group OPENT2). RESULTS: Compared with group LAPT1, group LAPT2 had younger patients, larger tumors and greater blood loss (100 vs 200 ml) (each p <0.001). Importantly operative time, analgesic requirements, hospital stay, and convalescence and complication rates were comparable. Group LAPT2 and group OPENT2 patients had similar sized tumors (9.2 and 9.9 cm, respectively) but shorter operative time (p = 0.03), lesser blood loss (p <0.001), shorter hospital stay (p <0.001) and more rapid convalescence (p = 0.02) occurred in LAPT2. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for stage T2 renal masses (greater than 7 cm) is feasible and efficacious. Laparoscopic nephrectomy offers the advantages of decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stay and more rapid recovery over open radical nephrectomy for comparable tumors greater than 7 cm. Although surgical outcomes are comparable with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for smaller tumors (7 cm or less), adequate laparoscopic experience is necessary before performing radical nephrectomy for large T2 tumors.

Histopathologic confirmation of complete cancer-cell kill in excised specimens after renal cryotherapy.

We present the first case of complete documentation of total cancer ablation in a previously cryoablated human renal tumor. A 61-year-old patient with metachronous bilateral renal cell carcinoma was treated with open partial nephrectomy and subsequently laparoscopic cryoablation. His renal function deteriorated, prompting bilateral radical nephrectomy before renal transplantation. Detailed histopathologic examination of the specimen did not reveal any evidence of malignancy in two cryoablated sites 36 months (left kidney) and 19 months (right kidney) after the respective cryoablations.

Laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for two or more ipsilateral renal tumors.

OBJECTIVES: To review our experience with laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery in the management of two or more synchronous, ipsilateral renal masses. Minimally invasive nephron-sparing procedures are increasingly used for the treatment of select patients with a single, small renal tumor. METHODS: Since 1998, we have performed laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery in 288 consecutive patients, including laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (n = 200) and renal cryotherapy (n = 88). Of these, 13 patients (4.5%) were treated for synchronous ipsilateral renal masses. RESULTS: A total of 27 renal tumors were treated in 13 patients. The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of the treatment. Group 1 (n = 3) underwent en-bloc laparoscopic partial nephrectomy encompassing both tumors; group 2 (n = 2) underwent individual laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of discrete masses during the same procedure; group 3 (n = 2) had one mass treated with partial nephrectomy and the other mass treated with cryotherapy; and group 4 (n = 6) had all tumors treated with cryotherapy. All cases were completed successfully without conversion to open surgery or laparoscopic nephrectomy. The mean overall operative time was 4.3 hours, and the mean blood loss was 169 mL. No intraoperative complications occurred. Three patients had postoperative complications, none requiring re-exploration. One patient in group 4 developed de novo tumors in the treated kidney, located distant from the cryoablated sites. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is an emerging, efficacious laparoscopic treatment option for select patients. Laparoscopic cryotherapy is a useful alternative or adjunct to partial nephrectomy. The judicious combination of these complementary techniques further extends the scope of minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery.

Critique of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in genitourinary oncology.

Regional lymphadenectomy is prognostic and selectively therapeutic in urologic oncology. The role of lymphadenectomy continues to be defined with the evolving multimodal management of genitourinary malignancies. Laparoscopy is playing a greater role in the management of genitourinary malignancies and thus, it is germane to critique the role of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the management of these tumors. Review of the literature suggests that laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy is feasible with nodal yields commensurate to those in open published series. Although laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous germ cell tumor is feasible, the technique and efficacy of this procedure require further investigation.

Real-time transrectal ultrasonography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We describe the technical aspects of real-time transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) monitoring and guidance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Furthermore, we describe the TRUS visualized anatomy of periprostatic structures during LRP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 25 consecutive patients undergoing transperitoneal LRP, baseline preoperative, real-time intraoperative and immediate postoperative TRUS evaluations were performed. To define periprostatic anatomy precisely TRUS measurements were obtained with specific reference to the neurovascular bundle (NVB), prostate apex, membranous urethra, bladder neck, rectal wall and any cancer nodule. Conventional gray scale, power Doppler, harmonic imaging and 3-dimensional ultrasound functions were used. RESULTS: Real-time TRUS navigation facilitated 3 technical aspects of LRP. 1) It identified the correct plane between the posterior bladder neck and prostate base, allowing quick laparoscopic identification of the vasa and seminal vesicles. 2) It identified the occasional, difficult to see distal protrusion of the prostate apex posterior to the membranous urethra, thus enhancing apical dissection with negative margins. 3) It provided visualization of any hypoechoic nodule abutting the prostate capsule, alerting the laparoscopic surgeon to perform wide dissection at that location. TRUS measured various anatomical parameters including i) the mean distance +/-SD between the NVB and the lateral edge of the prostate a) at apex (1.9 +/- 0.9 mm), b) base (2.5 +/- 0.8 mm) and c) tip of seminal vesicle (4.0 +/- 1.6 mm), ii) the dimensions of the NVB a) before (4.5 x 3.9 mm), b) after (4.2 x 3.6 mm) nerve sparing LRP and c) after nonnerve sparing LRP (0.9 x 0.9 mm), iii) arterial blood flow resistive index within NVB a) before (0.83 +/- 0.04), b) after (0.84 +/- 0.03) nerve sparing LRP and c) after nonnerve sparing LRP (0), iv) and the length of membranous urethra a) before (12.2 +/- 1.1 mm) and b) after (11.7 +/- 1.0 mm) surgery. Focal distortion of the prostate surface by an exophytic nodule was visualized on TRUS in 3 patients, necessitating ipsilateral nerve resection at LRP and contributing to negative surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: This initial experience suggests that real-time intraoperative TRUS guidance may enhance anatomical performance of LRP. This improved understanding of periprostatic anatomy has the potential to improve functional and oncological outcomes. Such corroboration is awaited.

Thoracic complications during urological laparoscopy.

PURPOSE: We documented thoracic related complications during urological laparoscopic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1129 patients underwent major urological laparoscopic procedures in a 5-year period. Operative reports and postoperative radiographic reports were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with thoracic related medical and surgical sequelae. Of the patients 619 (55%) underwent at least 1 chest x-ray in the immediate or early postoperative period. In the remaining 510 patients (45%) there was no clinical indication to perform chest x-ray. RESULTS: Of 619 patients undergoing chest x-ray 438 (71%) were completely normal. Medical pulmonary complications, surgical thoracic complications and subclinical, incidentally detected gas collections in the chest were identified in 12.6%, 0.5% and 5.5% of patients, respectively. Medical complications in 12.6% of cases included pulmonary infiltrate/atelectasis in 9.7%, pleural effusion in 4.8% and pulmonary embolus in 0.3%. Surgical complications included symptomatic pneumothorax in 4 patients (0.35%), hemothorax in 1 (0.08%) and chylothorax in 1 (0.08%). Subclinical abnormal thoracic gas collections were radiographically noted in 34 of the 619 patients (5.5%) on chest x-ray, including pneumomediastinum in 19 (3.1%), pneumothorax in 10 (1.6%) and pneumopericardium in 5 (0.8%). Overall 36 of 40 (90%) thoracic surgical complications (3) and subclinical, incidentally detected gas collections (33) occurred during retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Re-intervention was necessary in 6 patients (0.5%), namely pulmonary embolus requiring vena caval filter placement in 3 (0.3%), pneumothorax requiring a chest tube in 2 (0.17%) and hemothorax requiring emergency open thoracotomy in 1 (0.08%). No patient underwent open conversion to complete the initial proposed operation. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its high solubility the expectant management of incidental CO2 pneumothorax, pneumopericardium and pneumomediastinum is recommended initially in the clinically stable patient. Inadvertent diaphragmatic entry can be satisfactorily repaired laparoscopically without open conversion. Although it is rare, surgical thoracic complications are potentially life threatening, requiring prompt identification and management.

Laparoscopic radical adrenalectomy with adrenal vein tumor thrombectomy: technical considerations.

PURPOSE: We describe the technique of adrenal vein tumor thrombectomy during laparoscopic radical adrenalectomy for cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During laparoscopic adrenalectomy for a heterogeneous 7 cm left adrenal mass an adrenal vein thrombus was detected intraoperatively. Laparoscopic ultrasonography was used to delineate precisely the tumor thrombus and its extension into the left main renal vein. The left renal artery and vein were transiently controlled with atraumatic vascular clamps. The renal vein was incised and the intact tumor thrombus was removed en bloc with the radical adrenalectomy specimen. The renal vein was suture repaired with 4-zero prolene and the kidney was revascularized. RESULTS: Renal warm ischemia time was 21 minutes, blood loss was 300 cc and operative time was 6.2 hours. Pathological evaluation revealed a 7.5 cm 68 gm adrenal cortical cancer with tumor thrombus. Soft tissue and adrenal vein margins were negative for cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical adrenalectomy with en bloc adrenal vein tumor thrombectomy can be exclusively performed intracorporeally, while respecting oncological principles. Essential technical steps include wide margin excision of the adrenal gland, intraoperative ultrasonography, renal vascular control, en bloc tumor thrombectomy and renal venous suture repair in a bloodless field.

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in the presence of circumaortic or retroaortic left renal vein.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy is now an accepted alternative to open surgery in donors with normal renal vasculature. However, the suitability of laparoscopy for donors with anomalous vasculature is less well known. We compared the donor and recipient outcome data of 16 patients with circumaortic or retroaortic left renal vein to 20 recent patients with normal left renal venous anatomy undergoing laparoscopic donor left nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 170 patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at our institution from October 1997 to October 2002, 18 (10.6%) had either a circumaortic or retroaortic left renal vein (group 1). Demographic and perioperative parameters of these donors and their recipients were retrospectively compared to a contemporary cohort of 20 recent patients with a normal single left renal vein (group 2). RESULTS: All laparoscopic procedures were completed successfully without open conversion. Groups 1 and 2 were similar in regard to operative time (199 vs 226 minutes, p = 0.90), blood loss (125 vs 100 cc, p = 0.45), warm ischemia time (3.4 vs 3.9 minutes, p = 0.14) and hospital stay (2.9 vs 3.2 days, p = 0.45). Length of allograft renal artery and vein was similar between groups. Cold ischemia and revascularization times were also comparable between groups. Recipient serum creatinine was comparable at 5 days (1.7 vs 1.6 mg/dl), 3 months (1.5 vs 1.4 mg/dl) and 1 year (1.5 vs 1.5 mg/dl). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of a circumaortic or retroaortic renal vein is not a contraindication to laparoscopic live donor left nephrectomy. A left kidney with vasculature anatomically adequate for transplantation can be achieved with excellent donor and recipient outcomes.