Screening of Voice Pathologies: Identifying the Predictive Value of Voice Acoustic Parameters for Common Voice Pathologies.

BACKGROUND: Voice acoustic analysis is important for objectively assessing voice production and diagnosing voice disorders. AIM: This study aimed to investigate the sensitivity of various voice acoustic parameters in differentiating common voice pathology types. METHODS: Data from the publicly available Perceptual Voice Qualities Database were analyzed; the database includes recordings of participants with and without voice disorders. A wide range of acoustic parameters was estimated from the recordings, such as alpha ratio, harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), cepstral peak prominence smoothed (CPPS), pitch period entropy (PPE), fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, and sound pressure levels. The predictive capabilities of the parameters were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. Linear regression analysis determined the associations between parameters and voice disorders. Principal component analysis was conducted to identify important parameters for distinguishing voice disorders. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: This study has identified significant differences in acoustic parameters between those with and without voice disorders. Notably, the combination of five parameters-namely, PPE, shimmer, jitter, CPPS, and HNR-was identified as a strong predictor in voice disorder screening. These findings contribute substantially to the field of voice disorders, offering valuable insights for screening and diagnosis.

Vocal and Nonvocal Habits among Vedic Chanters.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to explore the voice concerns and vocal and nonvocal habits of Vedic chanters. PARTICIPANTS AND METHOD: A cross-sectional design was used to study 200 Vedic chanters using a 36-item questionnaire. This questionnaire was developed and administered to explore their voice concerns and vocal and nonvocal habits. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings and K-means cluster analysis was carried out to identify clusters concerning voice quality and influence of habits. RESULTS: The majority of Vedic chanters were involved in certain vocal habits such as use of loud voice while chanting and frequent throat clearing. Further, approximately half of the chanters expressed a concern towards their voice, while a vast majority experienced vocal fatigue. Cluster analysis helped in identification of 4 clusters: Vedic chanters with (1) good lifestyle and good voice characteristics (n = 107), (2) good lifestyle but bad voice characteristics (n = 15), (2) poor lifestyle and good voice characteristics (n = 51), and (4) poor lifestyle leading to bad voice characteristics (n = 27). CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study provide useful information on voice concern and vocal and nonvocal habits among a unique population of individuals. The current study of Vedic chanters highlights the need to have a detailed understanding of their specific voice usage, demands, and voice characteristics.

Aerodynamic and acoustic characteristics of voice in children with down syndrome-A systematic review.

PURPOSE: The anatomical, physiological, and phenotypic characteristics of children with Down Syndrome results in deviated acoustic and aerodynamic measures in their voice. These deviant vocal presentations may negatively affect the quality of life of children with Down syndrome. The present study aimed to systematically review the available literature on acoustic and aerodynamic voice characteristics of children with Down syndrome. METHOD: A systematic review of studies on acoustic and aerodynamic measures of voice in children with Down Syndrome (using PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest, Cochrane, Ovid, Science Direct) was carried out. Keywords based on Population-Investigation-Outcome were used to develop search strings. Two authors screened titles and abstracts independently, and appropriate studies were analyzed in detail for data extraction. RESULTS: Out of the 1432 studies, two studies met the inclusion criteria. Different acoustic and aerodynamic measures were employed, such as fundamental frequency, intensity, phonation time, jitter, shimmer and ESGP, MAFR, and LAR. CONCLUSION: Overall, there was a lack of standardized criteria for the evaluation of acoustic and aerodynamic characteristics in the Down syndrome population. Acoustically, there was no significant difference between children with DS and typically developing children. However, aerodynamic studies suggest that there is a significant impairment of glottal valving in children with Down syndrome.