Association of molecular variants of luteinizing hormone with male infertility.

Luteinizing hormone (LH) stimulates the interstitial Leydig cells to produce testosterone, which is essential for spermatogenesis. Abnormalities in the function of LH may affect the process of spermatogenesis and thus result in infertility. The aim of this study was to determine the association of three known variants of LH (Gln54Arg [Trp8Arg; Ile15Thr] and Gly102Ser) with male infertility. A total of 145 infertile men and 200 healthy fertile men were recruited and screened for the presence of these three LH variants. The Gln54Arg variant could not be detected in either of the groups studied. Twelve infertile (8.2%) and 15 fertile (7.5%) men were found to carry the [Trp8Ile; I15Thr] variant, but its occurrence did not show any significant difference between the patient and control groups. The Gly102Ser variant was detected in five patients with infertility (3.4%), but not in the control subjects (P = 0.013). This study showed that the Gln54Arg and [Trp8Ile; I15Thr] variants in the LHbeta gene were not associated with male infertility, whereas the Gly102Ser variant might be implicated in infertility in some Singapore Chinese men.

Association of molecular variants of luteinizing hormone with menstrual disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Luteinizing hormone (LH) promotes ovulation and luteinization of the ovarian follicle, and stimulates steroidogenesis in the ovaries. It is known to be present in different molecular forms, and secretion of abnormal LH has been implicated in menstrual disorders and infertility. The purpose of this study was to determine any association of two recently described LH variants with menstrual disorders in Singapore Chinese women. One of these variants had Trp8 to Arg8 and Ile15 to Thr15 replacements in the LH beta-subunit, while the second variant possessed Ser102 substitution for Gly102. PATIENTS: One hundred and seventy six patients with menstrual disorders and two hundred normal ovulatory women were recruited and screened for the presence of these two LH variants. METHODS: The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products of patients were analysed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and the results were compared with those of normal ovulatory women and confirmed by DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Twenty one (11.9%) patients with menstrual disorders and twenty (10%) normal ovulatory women were found to carry the first variant, but its occurrence did not show any significant statistical difference between the patient and control groups (P = 0.679). However, the second variant was only detected in seven (4%) patients with menstrual disorders, and none of the normal ovulatory subjects (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: the study showed that the first variant was not associated with menstrual disorders, whereas the second variant might be implicated in menstrual disorders in some Singapore Chinese women.