4-month moxifloxacin containing regimens in the treatment of patients with sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis in South India - a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Shortening tuberculosis (TB) treatment duration is a research priority. We tested the efficacy and safety of 3- and 4-month regimens containing moxifloxacin in a randomised clinical trial in pulmonary TB (PTB) patients in South India. METHODS: New, sputum-positive, adult, HIV-negative, non-diabetic PTB patients were randomised to 3- or 4-month moxifloxacin regimens [moxifloxacin (M), isoniazid (H), rifampicin (R), pyrazinamide (Z) and ethambutol (E)] or to a control regimen (2H3 R3 Z3 E3 /4R3 H3 ) [C]. The 4 test regimens were 3R7 H7 Z7 E7 M7 [M3], 2R7 H7 Z7 E7 M7 /2R7 H7 M7 [M4], 2R7 H7 Z7 E7 M7 /2R3 H3 M3 [M4-I] or 2R7 H7 Z7 E7 M7 /2R3 H3 E3 M3 [M4-IE]. Treatment was directly observed. Clinical and bacteriological assessments were done monthly during treatment and for 24 months post-treatment. The primary end point was TB recurrence post-treatment. RESULTS: Of 1371 patients, randomised, modified intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was done in 1329 and per-protocol (PP) analysis in 1223 patients. Regimen M3 was terminated due to high TB recurrence rates. 'Favourable' response at end of treatment was 96-100% in the moxifloxacin regimens and 93% in the control  regimen. Among these, the TB recurrence occurred in 4.1% in the M4 regimen and in 4.5% in the control regimen and demonstrated equivalence within a 5% margin (95% CI -3.68, 4.55). Similar findings were observed in modified ITT analysis. The TB recurrence rates in the M4-I and M4-IE regimens did not show equivalence with the control regimen. Sixteen (1.4%) of 1087 patients in the moxifloxacin regimens required treatment modification. CONCLUSION: The 4-month daily moxifloxacin regimen [M4] was found to be equivalent and as safe as the 6-month thrice-weekly control regimen.

CONTEXTE: La réduction de la durée du traitement de la tuberculose (TB) est une priorité de recherche. Nous avons testé l'efficacité et la sécurité de schémas thérapeutiques contenant de la moxifloxacine pendant 3 et 4 mois dans un essai clinique randomisé chez des patients atteints de TB pulmonaire (PTB) dans le sud de l'Inde. MÉTHODES: De nouveaux patients PTB, adultes, non diabétiques, positifs pour les expectorations, VIH négatifs ont été randomisés pour des schémas thérapeutiques contenant de la moxifloxacine pendant 3 mois ou 4 mois [moxifloxacine (M), isoniazide (H), rifampicine (R), pyrazinamide (Z), l'éthambutol (E)] ou pour un régime témoin (2H3 R3 Z3 E3 /4R3 H3 ) [C]. Les 4 régimes de l'essai étaient 3R7 H7 Z7 E7 M7 [M3], 2R7 H7 Z7 E7 M7 /2R7 H7 M7 [M4], 2R7 H7 Z7 E7 M7 /2R3 H3 M3 [M4-I] ou 2R7 H7 Z7 E7 M7 /2R3 H3 E3 M3 [M4-IE]. Le traitement a été directement observé. Les évaluations cliniques et bactériologiques ont été effectuées mensuellement au cours du traitement et durant 24 mois après le traitement. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la récidive de la TB après le traitement. RÉSULTATS: Des 1.371 patients randomisés, une analyse en intention de traiter (ITT) modifiée a été effectuée sur 1.329 et une analyse par protocole (PP) sur 1.223 patients. Le régime M3 a été interrompu en raison de taux élevés de récidive de la TB. La réponse «favorable¼ à la fin du traitement était de 96 à 100% dans les bras moxifloxacine et 93% dans le bras témoin. Parmi ceux-ci, la récidive de la TB est survenue chez 4,1% dans le schéma M4 et chez 4,5% dans le schéma témoin et a démontré une équivalence dans une marge de 5% (IC95%: −3,68, 4,55). Des résultats similaires ont été observés dans l'analyse ITT modifiée. Les taux de récidive de la TB dans les schémas M4-I et M4-IE n'ont pas montré d'équivalence avec le schéma témoin. 16 (1,4%) des 1.087 patients dans les régimes à moxifloxacine ont nécessité une modification du traitement. CONCLUSION: Le régime quotidien de moxifloxacine pendant 4 mois [M4] s'est avéré équivalent et aussi sûr que le régime témoin de trois fois par semaine pendant 6 mois.

Acquired rifampicin resistance in thrice-weekly antituberculosis therapy: impact of HIV and antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for acquired rifampicin resistance (ARR) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/tuberculosis coinfection, in the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era, needs evaluation. We studied the impact of HIV and HAART on ARR among patients taking thrice-weekly antituberculosis therapy. METHODS: This cross-protocol analysis included patients with newly diagnosed, rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis, with and without HIV, enrolled in clinical trials (who took >80% of medication) at the National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis between 1999 and 2013. All patients received rifampicin and isoniazid for 6 months reinforced with pyrazinamide and ethambutol in the first 2 months, given thrice-weekly throughout the study along with HAART in one of the groups. Outcomes were categorized and multivariate logistic regression analysis performed to identify risk factors for ARR. RESULTS: The per-protocol results included patients with tuberculosis: 246 HIV-uninfected patients (HIV(-)TB(+)), 212 HIV patients not on HAART (non-HAART), and 116 HIV-infected patients on HAART. Median CD4 counts of the latter 2 groups were 150 and 93 cells/µL, respectively, and the median viral loads were 147 000 and 266 000 copies/mL, respectively. Compared with HIV(-)TB(+), the relative risks (RRs) for an unfavorable response in the coinfected, non-HAART and HAART groups were 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-14.8; P<.0001) and 2.1 (95% CI, .9-5.2; P=.3), whereas for ARR, the RRs were 21.1 (95% CI, 2.6-184; P<.001) and 8.2 (95% CI, .6-104; P=.07), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis treated with a thrice-weekly antituberculosis regimen are at a higher risk of ARR, compared with HIV-uninfected patients, in the presence of baseline isoniazid resistance. HAART reduces but does not eliminate the risk of ARR.

Efficacy and safety of once-daily nevirapine- or efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-associated tuberculosis: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Nevirapine (NVP) can be safely and effectively administered once-daily but has not been assessed in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with tuberculosis (TB). We studied the safety and efficacy of once-daily NVP, compared with efavirenz (EFV; standard therapy); both drugs were administered in combination with 2 nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. METHODS: An open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at 3 sites in southern India. HIV-infected patients with TB were treated with a standard short-course anti-TB regimen (2EHRZ(3)/4RH(3); [2 months of Ethambutol, Isoniazid, Rifampicin, Pyrazinamide / 4 months of Isoniazid and Rifampicin] thrice weekly) and randomized to receive once-daily EFV at a dose of 600 mg or NVP at a dose of 400 mg (after 14 days of 200 mg administered once daily) with didanosine 250/400 mg and lamivudine 300 mg after 2 months. Sputum smears and mycobacterial cultures were performed every month. CD4+ cell count, viral load, and liver function test results were monitored periodically. Primary outcome was a composite of death, virological failure, default, or serious adverse event (SAE) at 24 weeks. Both intent-to-treat and per protocol analyses were done, and planned interim analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (75% [87 patients] of whom had pulmonary TB), with a mean age of 36 years, a median CD4+ cell count of 84 cells/mm(3), and a median viral load of 310 000 copies/mL, were randomized. At 24 weeks, 50 of 59 patients in the EFV group and 37 of 57 patients in the NVP group had virological suppression (P = .024). There were no deaths, 1 SAE, and 5 treatment failures in the EFV arm, compared with 5 deaths, 2 SAEs, and 10 treatment failures in the NVP arm. The trial was halted by the data and safety monitoring board at the second interim analysis. Favorable TB treatment outcomes were observed in 93% of the patients in the EFV arm and 84% of the patients in the NVP arm (P = .058). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a regimen of didanosine, lamivudine, and EFV, a regimen of once-daily didanosine, lamivudine, and NVP was inferior and was associated with more frequent virologic failure and death. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00332306.